Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
The Army Needs To Grow A Pair Already And Say No To Beards
At the beginning of 2017, the U.S. Army changed regulations to allow Sikh soldiers to grow beards under a religious exemption to male grooming standards. The surprise decision naturally inspired some service members to wonder, “If a small group can get an exception to the rules and grow beards because of their deeply held religious beliefs, why can’t I grow one because I think it looks badass?”
The Army has since vacillated on the question. After a spokesman for the assistant secretary of the Army – Manpower & Reserve Affairs told Task & Purpose beards were officially off the table in November, Sgt. Maj. of the Army Dan Dailey insisted that the new Army Secretary Mark Esper had not yet made a decision.
Let’s make this easy for Army brass: As long as you’re considering allowing any old soldier to look like Grizzly Adams, you may as well look at allowing dental grills, earrings for men, and nose rings. Hell, mullets will eventually come back into style. Why not authorize those, too? As long as we’re just accommodating the fashion trends of the moment, why the hell not?
U.S. Marine Corps photo
I know, I know: What about the members of America’s special operations forces? Even the odd civilian who slept through Zero Dark Thirty or Lone Survivor is obsessed with commandos’ flamboyant whiskers that signal not only their experience, but their superiority over the baby-faced infantry.
While I have nothing but respect for the special operations community, they’re the ones who started this God-awful phenomenon we find ourselves in the midst of, something I call “peak beard.” This is one of many TTPs (tactics, techniques, and procedures) that need to be left behind in-country, along with burn pits and masturbating in porta-potties.
Not that long ago, a beard marked a wearer as either a member of a southern rock band or someone with a deep desire to appear eccentric. Then 9/11 happened, and American special operators deployed to central Asia and the Middle East in unprecedented numbers. The rapid successes of those unconventional forces, especially in the early days of Operation Enduring Freedom, made them heroes — and, eventually, fashion icons. Pretty soon, the beard became part of the “veterans’ uniform,” along with a well-worn, vaguely vintage baseball cap and an obnoxious t-shirt. At this point, the only thing separating some vets from hipsters is wearing cargo pants instead of skinny jeans.
Now, even civilians try to pull off the look, praying that a particularly aggressive crumb catcher will make up for their lack of upper body strength and hard-on for wanton violence. But unfortunately, as guys like Seb Gorka have found, merely possessing enough testosterone to grow facial hair does not make you an alpha male. The ubiquity of scraggly beards among embarrassing keyboard warriors has only sullied the hallowed relationship between real operators and their prized fanny dusters.
Some of you have undoubtedly asked yourselves the question, “Would I look good with a beard?” If you actually have to ponder that question, the answer is no. There are generally two groups of men who look better with beards: those who’ve had disfiguring facial injuries and U.S. presidents named Abraham.
I’m not talking about a few days stubble from a shave vacation on a weekend or leave: that’s just expediency with a hint of laziness, not a trendy facial exploration. Besides, a neatly trimmed beard is way more work than just shaving. That’s what any possible change to the rules would ultimately mandate with its change to beard regs; high standards in grooming are part of military discipline. Sorry, but your dreams of going full-on ZZ Top just aren’t going to happen, no matter how hard you pray. Hardly worth it, really.
Yes, shaving is a little arbitrary, save for some exaggerated concerns over CBRN, but it is part of what makes the military the military. Creased trousers are arbitrary. Short hair is arbitrary. Lots of things in the military are arbitrary, but for the fact that consistency and uniformity are part of military life. Those who take care of the little things also take care of the big things.
Is there room for things to change? Yes. Military grooming and uniform standards do change with the times: We don’t wear dress uniforms or ties into battle anymore, we don’t have huge mustaches and sideburns like Civil War generals, and unfortunately, we don’t get to rock cocked covers and a full head of hair slicked back with Brylcreem while single-handedly mowing down German troops with a machine gun like Audie Murphy.
Maybe the day for bringing beards back will come. But it needs to come because the society and the military have actually changed, not just because every teenager who saw ZDT thinks that room-clearing while cosplaying Duck Dynasty makes war look awesome. If in 10 years, we have become a fully, or, uh, at least half, bearded society, it will be time to change. But if, we look at this era of peak beard with the same ridicule with which we now look upon mullets and pegged jeans, then we’ll all breathe a sigh of relief we didn’t abandon our military standards in a moment of weakness.
Now you can relive the glory days of screaming "fire for effect" before lobbing rounds down range, and you can do it from the comfort of your own backyard, or living room, without having to worry that some random staff sergeant is going to show up and chew you out for your unsat face scruff and Johnny Bravo 'do.
The leader of a Chicago-area street gang has been arrested and charged with attempting to aid the ISIS terrorist group, the Department of Justice said Friday.
Jason Brown, also known as "Abdul Ja'Me," allegedly gave $500 on three separate occasions in 2019 to a confidential informant Brown believed would then wire it to an ISIS fighter engaged in combat in Syria. The purported ISIS fighter was actually an undercover law enforcement officer, according to a DoJ news release.
My brother earned the Medal of Honor for saving countless lives — but only after he was left for dead
"As I learned while researching a book about John, the SEAL ground commander, Cmdr. Tim Szymanski, had stupidly and with great hubris insisted on insertion being that night."
Editor's Note: The following is an op-ed. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Task & Purpose.
Air Force Master Sgt. John "Chappy" Chapman is my brother. As one of an elite group, Air Force Combat Control — the deadliest and most badass band of brothers to walk a battlefield — John gave his life on March 4, 2002 for brothers he never knew.
They were the brave men who comprised a Quick Reaction Force (QRF) that had been called in to rescue the SEAL Team 6 team (Mako-30) with whom he had been embedded, which left him behind on Takur Ghar, a desolate mountain in Afghanistan that topped out at over 10,000 feet.
As I learned while researching a book about John, the SEAL ground commander, Cmdr. Tim Szymanski, had stupidly and with great hubris insisted on insertion being that night. After many delays, the mission should and could have been pushed one day, but Szymanski ordered the team to proceed as planned, and Britt "Slab" Slabinski, John's team leader, fell into step after another SEAL team refused the mission.
But the "plan" went even more south when they made the rookie move to insert directly atop the mountain — right into the hands of the bad guys they knew were there.
Sen. Rick Scott is backing a bipartisan bill that would allow service members to essentially sue the United States government for medical malpractice if they are injured in the care of military doctors.
The measure has already passed the House and it has been introduced in the Senate, where Scott says he will sign on as a co-sponsor.
"As a U.S. Senator and member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, taking care of our military members, veterans and their families is my top priority," the Florida Republican said in a statement.