Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
The Army is ready to protect Lt. Col. Vindman and his family following impeachment testimony
Editor's Note: This article originally appeared on Business Insider.
The Army is prepared to move Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and his family to a secure location on a military base if it's deemed necessary, according to U.S. officials who spoke to The Wall Street Journal.
Vindman has been the target of repeated public attacks, including from President Donald Trump, over his central role in the escalating impeachment inquiry into Trump.
If it's determined that Vindman or his family are in physical danger, then they will be moved to a safe location, the Journal reported.
Army spokeswoman Col. Kathy Turner said in a statement to Insider that the Army "is providing supportive assistance to help Lt. Col. Vindman with the public attention."
"As a matter of practice, the Army would neither confirm nor deny any safety or security measures taken on behalf of an individual; however, as we would with any Soldier, the Army will work with civilian authorities to ensure that he and his family are properly protected," Turner added.
Vndman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, is a key figure in the impeachment inquiry. The active duty Army officer and Iraq War combat veteran was on a July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that is at the center of the investigation.
During the call, Trump urged Zelensky to launch investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, as well as a debunked conspiracy theory linked to the 2016 election.
"I was concerned by the call. What I heard was inappropriate...It was improper for the president to demand an investigation into a political opponent," Vindman said during his public testimony on Tuesday.
Republican lawmakers on the panel in Tuesday's impeachment hearings sought to discredit Vindman in multiple ways, including by zeroing in on the fact he wore his military uniform. The president's GOP allies also sought to smear Vindman by implying that he has dual loyalty to Ukraine. Vindman came to the U.S. from Ukraine as a refugee when he was a child and the country was still part of the former Soviet Union.
During Tuesday's hearings, some Democrats on the panel touched on safety concerns in their questioning of Vindman, particularly given the attacks he's faced.
At the beginning of his testimony, Vindman sent an emotional message to his father, applauding his choice to bring the family to the U.S. decades ago. He told his father not to worry, adding, "I will be fine for telling the truth."
When asked why he told his father not to worry, Vindman said: "This is America. This is the country I served and defended, that all my brothers have served — and here — right matters."
The former refugee received a standing ovation for these remarks.
Read more from Business Insider:
- Trump and Republicans zero in on decorated Army officer Alexander Vindman wearing his military uniform to impeachment hearings
- 'It's Lt. Col. Vindman': Key impeachment witness corrects Devin Nunes for addressing him as 'Mister' during impeachment hearing
- Sensor firm FLIR grabs first big Army unmanned systems contract since it bought Endeavor Robotics for $382 million
The FBI is treating the recent shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, as a terrorist attack, several media outlets reported on Sunday.
"We work with the presumption that this was an act of terrorism," USA Today quoted FBI Agent Rachel Rojas as saying at a news conference.
WASHINGTON/SEOUL (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un risks losing "everything" if he resumes hostility and his country must denuclearize, after the North said it had carried out a "successful test of great significance."
"Kim Jong Un is too smart and has far too much to lose, everything actually, if he acts in a hostile way. He signed a strong Denuclearization Agreement with me in Singapore," Trump said on Twitter, referring to his first summit with Kim in Singapore in 2018.
"He does not want to void his special relationship with the President of the United States or interfere with the U.S. Presidential Election in November," he said.
The three sailors whose lives were cut short by a gunman at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, on Friday "showed exceptional heroism and bravery in the face of evil," said base commander Navy Capt. Tim Kinsella.
Ensign Joshua Kaleb Watson, Airman Mohammed Sameh Haitham, and Airman Apprentice Cameron Scott Walters were killed in the shooting, the Navy has announced.
The Pentagon’s troop deployment denials means nothing when the White House screams ‘fake news’ all the time
The Pentagon has a credibility problem that is the result of the White House's scorched earth policy against any criticism. As a result, all statements from senior leaders are suspect.
We're beyond the point of defense officials being unable to say for certain whether a dog is a good boy or girl. Now we're at the point where the Pentagon has spent three days trying to knock down a Wall Street Journal story about possible deployments to the Middle East, and they've failed to persuade either the press or Congress.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the United States was considering deploying up to 14,000 troops to the Middle East to thwart any potential Iranian attacks. The story made clear that President Trump could ultimately decide to send a smaller number of service members, but defense officials have become fixated on the number 14,000 as if it were the only option on the table.
This article originally appeared on Business Insider.
SIMI VALLEY, Calif. – Gen. David Berger, the US Marine Corps commandant, suggested the concerns surrounding a service members' use of questionable Chinese-owned apps like TikTok should be directed against the military's leadership, rather than the individual troops.
Speaking at the Reagan National Defense Forum in Simi Valley, California, on Saturday morning, Berger said the younger generation of troops had a "clearer view" of the technology "than most people give them credit for."
"That said, I'd give us a 'C-minus' or a 'D' in educating the force on the threat of even technology," Berger said. "Because they view it as two pieces of gear, 'I don't see what the big deal is.'"