Who's Behind The Mysterious Airstrike On The Afghan-Tajikistan Border?

Analysis

Armed clashes erupted at the Afghan-Tajikistan border on Monday, though questions remain about who exactly was involved in the skirmish and in what capacity.  


Ten people, including two Tajik forestry officials, were reportedly killed in the fighting, which occurred in Afghanistan’s northeastern Takhar province. According to The Diplomat, the other casualties were “either smugglers or Taliban” killed by an airstrike unleashed by an unidentified aircraft that Afghan officials believe was of “either Russian or Tajik origin.”

Who exactly was initiated the clashes, however, remains ambiguous.  Afghan government officials claim that the clashes occurred on the Afghan side of the border. And the Taliban denied that the gunmen identified by Tajikistan as drug smugglers were affiliated with the group, let alone any involvement in the incident more broadly. While this is a dubious assertion given the groups’ reliance on drug trafficking for revenue, a Taliban spokesman reiterated that in a statement to the New York Times that its fighters are solely focused on fighting the Afghan government

Lt. Azimov Farzod, company commander of the special company, Tajikistan Peacekeeping Battalion of the Mobile Forces, receives information from one of his soldiers at a traffic control point at a mountain training camp outside of Dushanbe, TajikistanDepartment of Defense

The same goes for the fatal airstrike that ended the confrontation. A spokesman for Tajikistan’s Forestry Service in the region would not confirm that two forestry officers were killed, and the same Tajik government official also denied carrying out an airstrike. Tajikistan is not incapable of providing close air support on it’s borders: Despite its lack of overall military power, the country does have several L-39 jet trainers which have been photographed armed with 57mm UB-16-57-U Rocket Pods and several Mi-24 Hind Helicopters, which gained infamy during the 1980 occupation of Afghanistan.

Still, doubts linger among international outside observers as to whether the Tajik Air Force has the ability to carry out airstrikes without foreign assistance, which leaves the U.S. and Russia as potential instigators. According to Al Jazeera, a spokesman for U.S. forces in Afghanistan said the American military did not conduct any airstrikes in the province of Takhar when the clash occurred. Russia, which shares a border with Tajikistan and has offered the country security assistance in the past, denied involvement after local Afghan military representative reported the strike was conducted by what he described as a “MiG.”

With this in mind, Moscow is a prime suspect in the strike for two reasons. First, the proximity and recent movements of Russian forces in the area: According to Tajikistan news service Asia Plus, Tajik airspace is patrolled by Russian aircraft as part of the Joint CIS Air Defense System, mostly for search and rescue missions, transportation, and the occasional attack on militant groups.’ Indeed, the 201st Military Base in Tajikistan is one of Russia’s largest overseas outposts, and the 670th Air Group is present at the base with a detachment of Su-25 Frogfoot air-to-ground attack aircraft. If a Russian intervention occurred, they would be among the likeliest first responders.

A Russian Su-25, Wikipedia CC.Aleksandr Markin

Second, Russia has a vested interest in the integrity of its neighbor’s borders. Extremist groups have been active in Tajikistan for decades, and several Tajiks have risen to the highest ranks of the core ISIS caliphate in Syria. Russia is also a major drug corridor through which approximately one-third of the world’s heroin supply transits every year, and Tajikistan is one major funnel to mother Russia. Tajikistan’s recent uptick in extremist violence — such as the special police commander who defected to ISIS in 2017 and the knife attack on four tourists earlier this month — captures the specter of chaos that belies the stable exterior of the authoritarian state, chaos which could potentially burst forth thanks to the instability to the south in Afghanistan.

That doesn’t mean the United States is sitting on its hands. Those threat factors prompted the United States to deploy Army Special Forces teams to Tajikistan to train up its security forces, plus a pile of rotational exercises with conventional U.S. Army forces as recently as April of this year. 

A Tajik service members assumes a defense position during a field training exercise part of multinational exercise Regional Cooperation 2017, July 17, 2017, in Fakhrabad, Tajikistan.Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Michael Battles

As the security situation in Afghanistan continues to deteriorate, the possibility of border clashes occurring between neighboring states and non-state actors increases. Russia has a vested interest in preserving security of its southern flank, and former Soviet states are rightfully wary of homegrown extremism thanks to the perpetual dumpster fire that is Afghanistan. But despite this, the chances of border violence, such as this mysterious bombing, and intervention by Afghan neighbors can only increase as the United States looks for an exit  — and that may see powers, such as Russia, that are geographically closer to the troubled Central Asian state into the fray.

A enlisted thinktank brought to you by Task & Purpose

The FBI is treating the recent shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, as a terrorist attack, several media outlets reported on Sunday.

"We work with the presumption that this was an act of terrorism," USA Today quoted FBI Agent Rachel Rojas as saying at a news conference.

Read More Show Less

WASHINGTON/SEOUL (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un risks losing "everything" if he resumes hostility and his country must denuclearize, after the North said it had carried out a "successful test of great significance."

"Kim Jong Un is too smart and has far too much to lose, everything actually, if he acts in a hostile way. He signed a strong Denuclearization Agreement with me in Singapore," Trump said on Twitter, referring to his first summit with Kim in Singapore in 2018.

"He does not want to void his special relationship with the President of the United States or interfere with the U.S. Presidential Election in November," he said.

Read More Show Less
(U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Vaughan Dill/Released)

The three sailors whose lives were cut short by a gunman at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, on Friday "showed exceptional heroism and bravery in the face of evil," said base commander Navy Capt. Tim Kinsella.

Ensign Joshua Kaleb Watson, Airman Mohammed Sameh Haitham, and Airman Apprentice Cameron Scott Walters were killed in the shooting, the Navy has announced.

Read More Show Less

The Pentagon has a credibility problem that is the result of the White House's scorched earth policy against any criticism. As a result, all statements from senior leaders are suspect.

We're beyond the point of defense officials being unable to say for certain whether a dog is a good boy or girl. Now we're at the point where the Pentagon has spent three days trying to knock down a Wall Street Journal story about possible deployments to the Middle East, and they've failed to persuade either the press or Congress.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the United States was considering deploying up to 14,000 troops to the Middle East to thwart any potential Iranian attacks. The story made clear that President Trump could ultimately decide to send a smaller number of service members, but defense officials have become fixated on the number 14,000 as if it were the only option on the table.

Read More Show Less

This article originally appeared on Business Insider.

SIMI VALLEY, Calif. – Gen. David Berger, the US Marine Corps commandant, suggested the concerns surrounding a service members' use of questionable Chinese-owned apps like TikTok should be directed against the military's leadership, rather than the individual troops.

Speaking at the Reagan National Defense Forum in Simi Valley, California, on Saturday morning, Berger said the younger generation of troops had a "clearer view" of the technology "than most people give them credit for."

"That said, I'd give us a 'C-minus' or a 'D' in educating the force on the threat of even technology," Berger said. "Because they view it as two pieces of gear, 'I don't see what the big deal is.'"

Read More Show Less