Could Cyber Geeks Make It Into The Marines Without Going To Boot Camp?

news
U.S. Marines assigned to the Cyber Security Technician course, Marine Corps Communications-Electronics School, work on a assignment at Marine Corps Base Twentynine Palms, California on March 15, 2017.
U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Jose Villalobosrocha

Marine Corps at mid-career levels may be back on the table — and with it, an added caveat that’s sure to rustle the jimmies of many Marines still serving: These cyber specialists might skip boot camp altogether, according to Marine Corps Times’ Jeff Schogol.


The tentative proposal, initially proposed by then-Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter in 2016, is only one of several ideas being considered to combat concerns about severe cyber warfare readiness by allowing qualified information-technology specialists to enter the service laterally, at the rank of staff sergeant or higher — foregoing recruit training and jumping right into the digital fray.

The Marines are far from the only branch to consider a proposal like this; in fact, they’re outliers, the one service that’s proven most resistant to the idea. After all, it’s in boot camp that recruits learn what it means to be a Marine, and without that shared experience, the service's identity could be weakened.

Related: The Army Wants To Recruit Cyber Experts By Hiring Civilians At Rank Of Colonel »

At least, that’s the argument put forward by some critics. “If you go away from that, then I think you lose something that has made the Marine Corps what it is,” retired Marine officer Dakota Wood, who served on President Trump’s transition team, told Marine Corps Times. “A Marine is a Marine… If that breaks down, you’ve got problems.”

Recruiting Marines laterally, without the crucible of boot camp, isn’t entirely without precedent: Musicians of the Marine Corps “President’s Own” band aren’t required to attend recruit training, provided they pass their auditions.

Even so, the likelihood of the Corps adopting the proposal is more remote than Marine Corps Times suggests, according to sources in the service who have spoken with T&P.;

Another option being considered is to treat Marine Forces Cyberspace Command like Marine Corps Special Operations Command and limit entry to more senior and experienced Marines. Some have even argued for a standalone cyber service.

While lateral entry may seem like a potential identity-crisis-causing proposal, there are some strong arguments to consider bringing in cyber specialists at mid-career levels. For starters, that’s probably the easiest way to get someone with the right talent: You’re not going to convince a 26-year old who works his own hours and makes $150,000 to trade that in for the life of a private who has every moment of every day planned out for him. But, you give him a decent salary and tell him he can play the “Marine card” to get free drinks, and boom: You’ve got yourself a Marine Corps hacker nerd.

Those in favor of the proposal — which is still purely speculative, Marine Corps officials stressed to Task & Purpose — say that the Corps simply needs too many specialists right now to consider training them up from the start.

Both sides say they’re looking at the risks versus the rewards of such a move.

“There are risks to [eroding] the trust that is imbibed through the shared experience of having gone through all of the physical and military training,” Katherine Kidder, a military personnel expert with the Center for a New American Security, told Marine Corps Times. “On the flip side, there’s also a huge risk right now if we don’t have cyber expertise resident within the services themselves.”

Personally, I’m of the opinion that anyone who joins the Corps will quickly learn what it means to be a Marine, with or without boot camp. Ten minutes into their first day as hoodie-clad and goateed cyber warfare specialists, they’ll hear the phrases “uber-pog,” “boot!” and “hey there devil dog, did you forget to shave?” — thus binding them in a Marine Corps tradition as old and as storied as recruit training: shitting on the new guy.

Editor's Note: The following is an op-ed. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Task & Purpose.

The "suck it up and drive on" mentality permeated our years in the U.S. military and often led us to delay getting both physical and mental health care. As veterans, we now understand that engaging in effective care enables us not just to survive but to thrive. Crucially, the path to mental wellness, like any serious journey, isn't accomplished in a day — and just because you need additional or recurring mental health care doesn't mean your initial treatment failed.

Read More Show Less

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared on Radio Free Europe/Radio Free Liberty.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has called on the security alliance's allies to maintain and strengthen their "unity," saying the organization is "the only guarantor of European and transatlantic security."

Stoltenberg told reporters on November 19 that NATO "has only grown stronger over the last 70 years" despite "differences" among the allies on issues such as trade, climate, the Iran nuclear deal, and the situation in northeastern Syria.

He was speaking at the alliance's headquarters in Brussels on the eve of a NATO foreign ministers meeting aimed at finalizing preparations for next month's summit in London.

Read More Show Less
An aerial view of the Pentagon building in Washington, June 15, 2005. (Reuters/Jason Reed JIR/CN)

WASHINGTON — More than $35 million of the roughly $400 million in aid to Ukraine that President Donald Trump delayed, sparking the impeachment inquiry, has not been released to the country, according to a Pentagon spending document obtained by the Los Angeles Times.

Instead, the defense funding for Ukraine remains in U.S. accounts, according to the document. It's not clear why the money hasn't been released, and members of Congress are demanding answers.

Read More Show Less
Paul Szoldra/Task & Purpose

The admiral in charge of Navy special operators will decide whether to revoke the tridents for Eddie Gallagher and other SEALs involved in the Navy's failed attempt to prosecute Gallagher for murder, a defense official said Tuesday.

The New York Times' David Philipps first reported on Tuesday that the Navy could revoke the SEAL tridents for Gallagher as well as his former platoon commander Lt. Jacob Portier and two other SEALs: Lt. Cmdr. Robert Breisch and Lt. Thomas MacNeil.

The four SEALs will soon receive a letter that they have to appear before a board that will consider whether their tridents should be revoked, a defense official told Task & Purpose on condition of anonymity.

Read More Show Less

Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman made sure to take the time to correct a Congressman on Tuesday while testifying before Congress, requesting that he be addressed by his officer rank and not "Mr."

Read More Show Less