Get Ready For A Mini-Troop Surge In Afghanistan

Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Lucas Hopkins

The Pentagon had previously announced plans to expand U.S. military operations in Afghanistan by at least several thousand additional troops, but future deployments to the country will apparently depend on the number of additional forces NATO is willing to commit to the 16-year effort to defeat the Taliban, Stars and Stripes reports.

The Washington Post reported on May 9 that the Trump administration was poised to sign off on a plan that would send at least three thousand more U.S. troops to Afghanistan. Their mission, officials said, would be to halt Taliban progress and pressure the group to come to the negotiating table.

If that mission seems familiar, it should: That was also the goal in 2010, when the Obama administration surged troop levels in the country to 100,000.

However, a defense official told Stars and Stripes that how many additional U.S. forces will be deployed to Afghanistan has not been decided yet, and that the number will be set only after it’s clear how many troops NATO partners are willing to commit.

President Trump is scheduled to meet with those partners in Brussels later his month.    

There are currently 8,400 American service members deployed to Afghanistan. NATO partners contribute 4,900 more. The bulk of the forces are focused on training and advising Afghan troops, while Special Operations troops are also waging a more direct campaign against the Islamic State’s local affiliate, known as ISIS-K.  On April 27, the group’s leader, Abdul Hasib, was killed during a raid in Nangarhar Province that also resulted in the deaths of two Army Rangers.

Since the NATO combat mission in Afghanistan officially ended in late 2014, the Taliban has made significant battlefield gains, seizing key districts once under coalition control and inflicting massive casualties on Afghan government forces. Last month, at least 140 soldiers were killed by Taliban militants on a military base in northern Afghanistan, in what was the single deadliest attack by the insurgent group since 2001.  

Gen. John Nicholson, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has been pushing for increased troop levels since February, when he told the Senate Armed Services Committee that “a few thousand” more would make it possible to carry out airstrikes against Taliban targets and for coalition forces to advise Afghan troops closer to the front lines.  

It’s unclear whether or not America’s NATO partners are willing to expand their involvement in the fight, but the BBC reports that NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has asked Britain to consider sending more troops to Afghanistan.

Every once in a while, we run across a photo in The Times-Picayune archives that's so striking that it begs a simple question: "What in the name of Momus Alexander Morgus is going on in this New Orleans photograph?" When we do, we've decided, we're going to share it — and to attempt to answer that question.

Read More Show Less
Members of the Syrian Democratic Forces control the monitor of their drone at their advanced position, during the fighting with Islamic State's fighters in Nazlat Shahada, a district of Raqqa. (Reuters/Zohra Bensemra)

MUSCAT (Reuters) - The United States should keep arming and aiding the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) following the planned U.S. withdrawal from Syria, provided the group keeps up the pressure on Islamic State, a senior U.S. general told Reuters on Friday.

Read More Show Less

President Donald Trump claims the $6.1 billion from the Defense Department's budget that he will now spend on his border wall was not going to be used for anything "important."

Trump announced on Friday that he was declaring a national emergency, allowing him to tap into military funding to help pay for barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Read More Show Less

Long before Tony Stark took a load of shrapnel to the chest in a distant war zone, science fiction legend Robert Heinlein gave America the most visceral description of powered armor for the warfighter of the future. Forget the spines of extra-lethal weaponry, the heads-up display, and even the augmented strength of an Iron Man suit — the real genius, Heinlein wrote in Starship Troopers, "is that you don't have to control the suit; you just wear it, like your clothes, like skin."

"Any sort of ship you have to learn to pilot; it takes a long time, a new full set of reflexes, a different and artificial way of thinking," explains Johnny Rico. "Spaceships are for acrobats who are also mathematicians. But a suit, you just wear."

First introduced in 2013, U.S. Special Operations Command's Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit (TALOS) purported to offer this capability as America's first stab at militarized powered armor. And while SOCOM initially promised a veritable Iron Man-style tactical armor by 2018, a Navy spokesman told Task & Purpose the much-hyped exoskeleton will likely never get off the launch pad.

"The prototype itself is not currently suitable for operation in a close combat environment," SOCOM spokesman Navy Lt. Phillip Chitty told Task & Purpose, adding that JATF-TALOS has no plans for an external demonstration this year. "There is still no intent to field the TALOS Mk 5 combat suit prototype."

Read More Show Less

D-Day veteran James McCue died a hero. About 500 strangers made sure of it.

"It's beautiful," Army Sgt. Pete Rooney said of the crowd that gathered in the cold and stood on the snow Thursday during McCue's burial. "I wish it happened for every veteran's funeral."

Read More Show Less