Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
The Global War On Terror Will Finally Get Its Own Monument In DC
The military campaign against international terrorism launched in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks may be far from over, but the fallen U.S. service members of the America's Global War on Terror are already receiving a physical tribute to their sacrifice.
On Aug. 3, the Senate unanimously passed the Global War on Terrorism Memorial Act, paving the way for the establishment of the National Global War on Terrorism Memorial in Washington, D.C. The legislation now heads to the White House to receive President Donald Trump’s signature.
First introduced in the House in February 2017, the legislation will authorize the Global War on Terror Memorial Foundation to immediately quarterback the design, fundraising, and construction of the monument on federal land, where it will honor the sacrifices of post-9/11 service members alongside those from World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War.
Ever since he established the Global War on Terror Memorial Foundation to campaign for a physical tribute to GWOT service members and veterans, Army veteran Andrew Brennan has faced one major legislative obstacle: The Commemorative Works Act of 1986 requires that the federal government only erect national war memorials 10 years after the end of conflicts — a difficult proposition for an anti-terror campaign that has only expanded in size and scope since 2001, and shows no signs of slowing down.
The legislation passed by the House and Senate, H.R. 873, included an exemption from the Commemorative Works Acts, a recognition of the unusual nature of the service and sacrifice of 3 million fighting men and women who deployed as part of the nation’s longest war.
“This memorial will be wholly dedicated to our 7,000 brothers and sisters who deployed with us, but did not return and their survivors. It is dedicated to the 1 million wounded warriors who are reclaiming their lives back here at home. It is for the soldiers, airmen, sailors, and Marines who struggle in their transition from combat deployments,” Brennan said in a statement. “We’re looking forward to building a sacred place of healing and remembrance for our GWOT veterans, a place for families to gather together to honor their loved ones, and for future generations of Americans to learn about a war they will likely grow up alongside of.”
The new memorial doesn’t just include those service members who deployed to the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan. The Senate bill defines the “Global War on Terrorism” as “any contingency operation conducted by the Armed Forces in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, or other terrorist attack.”
Under this broad definition, this emcompasses basically every military operation justified by the broad 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; Operation Inherent Resolve against ISIS in Syria; a handful of incursions in Libya; foreign military training, advising, assisting in the Philippines and Georgia; secure detention operations at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; counter-terrorism and combat operations in Djibouti, Yemen, Kenya, Somalia, Ethiopia, and elsewhere in the Horn of Africa; and the special operations forces deployed in 80 countries around the world.
“I could not be more proud that we are one step closer to securing our post 9/11 veterans’ rightful place in our nation’s capital,” House bill sponsor Rep. Mike Gallagher, a Republican from Wisconsin and a Marine veteran, told Task & Purpose, “My hope is that this memorial will serve as a way to honor those who paid the ultimate sacrifice and as a call to action for us, the living. I look forward to the president signing this bill into law as soon as possible so that the Global War on Terrorism Memorial will one day stand alongside others as an enduring reminder of the cost of liberty.”
For the legislation’s sponsors in Congress, the whole purpose of the bill is not just to memorialize the sacrifices on foreign battlefields, but to ensure that that U.S. military personnel who work behind the scenes and in the shadows to beat back the rising tide of international terror — like U.S. Special Operations Command forces on the front lines in dozens of countries — do not go forgotten.
"Passage of this bill is an important first step in ensuring that the men and women who willingly gave their lives in the War on Terror are afforded a place on the national mall where their loved ones can pay respects and honor their sacrifice,” Rep. Seth Moulton, a Democrat from Massachusetts and Marine vet who co-sponsored the House bill with Gallagher, said in a statement on July 28. “For me, like so many of my colleagues, this is personal.”
The Air Force's top general says one of the designers of the ride-sharing app Uber is helping the branch build a new data-sharing network that the Air Force hopes will help service branches work together to detect and destroy targets.
The network, which the Air Force is calling the advanced battle management system (ABMS), would function a bit like the artificial intelligence construct Cortana from Halo, who identifies enemy ships and the nearest assets to destroy them at machine speed, so all the fleshy humans need to do is give a nod of approval before resuming their pipe-smoking.
An F-15 is rocking a WWII paint job to honor a B-17 pilot who gave his life to save a wounded crewman
An F-15C Eagle is sporting a badass World War II-era paint job in honor of a fallen bomber pilot who gave everything to ensure his men survived a deadly battle.
A U.S. E-11A Battlefield Airborne Communications Node aircraft crashed on Monday on Afghanistan, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein has confirmed.
Beloved basketball legend Kobe Bryant, his daughter, and seven other people were killed in a helicopter crash in Calabasas, California on Sunday. Two days earlier, Army Spc. Antonio I. Moore was killed during a vehicle rollover accident while conducting route clearing operations in Syria.
Which one more deserves your grief and mourning? According to Maj. Gen. John R. Evans, commander of the U.S. Army Cadet Command, you only have enough energy for one.
After 70 years, service members are finally filing medical malpractice claims against the US military
Jessica Purcell, a captain in the U.S. Army Reserve, was pregnant with her first child when she noticed a swollen lymph node in her left underarm.
Health-care providers at a MacDill Air Force Base clinic told her it was likely an infection or something related to pregnancy hormones. The following year they determined the issue had resolved itself.
It hadn't. A doctor off base found a large mass in her underarm and gave her a shocking diagnosis: stage 2 breast cancer.
Purcell was pregnant again. Her daughter had just turned 1. She was 35. And she had no right to sue for malpractice.
A 1950 Supreme Court ruling known as the Feres doctrine prohibits military members like Purcell from filing a lawsuit against the federal government for any injuries suffered while on active duty. That includes injury in combat, but also rape and medical malpractice, such as missing a cancer diagnosis.
Thanks in part to Tampa lawyer Natalie Khawam, a provision in this year's national defense budget allows those in active duty to file medical malpractice claims against the government for the first time since the Feres case.
With the Department of Defense overseeing the new claims process, the question now is how fairly and timely complaints will be judged. And whether, in the long run, this new move will help growing efforts to overturn the ruling and allow active duty members to sue like everyone else.