Civil War-Era Submarine Revealed To Public After Years Of Restoration

History
The Confederate submarine H.L. Hunley is credited with the first-recorded, successful underwater attack against the USS Housatonic.
Image via the U.S. Navy

Even as the public gets its first sneak peek at the interior of the Civil War-era Hunley, the world’s first successful combat submarine continues to hold onto its chief mysteries.


Nearly 17 years after researchers began working to unravel why the Confederate sub went down off the Charleston coast, questions linger about why it sank and precisely how the eight-man crew perished.

“We have 90 percent of (the evidence),” project archaeologist Michael Scafuri said June 7 during a media tour to advertise the new views inside the 40-foot by 4 1/2 -foot submersible. “But we still can’t say conclusively.”

The Hunley sunk the USS Housatonic on Feb. 17, 1864, and then went down. The boat was found in 1995 and raised in 2000. Its exterior was put on permanent public display the next year. Now, visitors can see inside as the Hunley sits in a 75,000-gallon tank of water preserved with a 1 percent solution of sodium hydroxide.

After more than a year of painstaking work by researchers inside the cramped hull, visitors can see the experimental war craft’s innards, said members of the team, who work at the site’s Clemson University Restoration Institute, on the former Charleston Navy Base.

Two people outfitted in head-to-toe safety uniforms have been contorting themselves inside the sub. They use stainless steel orthopedic tools and a pneumatic chisel to gently remove the sea’s encrustation, which slowly has enveloped the sub in the 136 years since it went down, said Johanna Rivera-Diaz, project conservator.

The crew’s primary remains have been exhumed and buried. Many small bones – fingers, wrists and teeth – have been discovered since then, chronicled and traced through historic records to individual crewmen, Rivera-Diaz said.

The largest number of bones have been linked to first crewman Arnold Becker, who sat closest to the Hunley’s captain, George Dixon, near the sub’s bow, as Becker helped turn the propeller crank, she said.

On most of the five-hour days that Rivera-Diaz and another researcher work inside the submarine from its bow and stern, their focus is on the delicate precision needed to remove what the sea deposited over the decades.

The tank must be drained and refilled each of the three days a week the researchers are inside. It takes four hours each time the water is removed and returned, she said. Even as they work, the hull must be covered in plastic to help retain moisture that is key to preserving the boat.

The center of the submarine’s interior has yet to have the build-up removed.

The protective gear insulates the researchers from the caustic sodium hydroxide that helps draw salt from what they call “concretion” that’s attached to every inch of the Hunley.

But on certain days and with the discovery of memorable artifacts, Rivera-Diaz is struck by the historic value of the work. “When I find something, I step back and say, ‘Wow,’” she said.

Still, the pace of the job can be frustrating.

“We were hoping to be pretty much done” some 18 months after work on removing encrustation began, she said. The new timetable is now the end of this year.

Related stories from The State

First public look inside Hunley submarine since it sank in the 1800s

Scafuri, the archaeologist, focuses on all the progress they have made since the sub was delivered into their hands. “It looks like a submarine as opposed to a corroded artifact,” he said from a visitation platform above the vessel.

Most of the hypotheses that researchers had about the Hunley have been borne out by the artifacts, he said, citing the discovery of pieces of textiles that support notions that some crew members had wrapped the propeller crank to avoid blisters.

A simulation indicated that the force of an explosive blast when the Housatonic was struck was not sufficient to have sunk the Hunley, Scafuri said. But the explosion could have knocked the crew unconscious.

“There are a lot of unanswered questions about what really happened that night,” he said.

One theory that has been ruled out is that the Hunley was equipped with a detachable torpedo. A long wire and a spool found inside would point to the likelihood that the sub had an internal trigger. The trigger would not have launched the payload but simply been used to detonate the roughly 135 pounds of black powder in the explosive head that was attached to a slim, metal rod, he said.

Another hypothesis the evidence has eliminated is that the crew drowned. A three-dimensional reconstruction showed each man died seated at his post along the crank shaft.

“That means there was no panic,” Scafuri said. “It complicates our theories.” Yet he remains fascinated by the project.

A new working theory is that the crew asphyxiated – not drowned from water in their lungs – after they consumed all the oxygen in the sub’s air bubble.

Scafuri would not say when the research will be done and or when the team would proclaim solutions to the deepest mysteries of the Hunley.

“I could never say, ‘This is what happened’ ... until we’re done,” the archaeologist said. He said he doesn’t know when that might be.

———

©2017 The State (Columbia, S.C.). Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

The U.S. Navy aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) underway on its own power for the first time while leaving Newport News Shipbuilding, Newport News, Virginia (USA), on April 8, 2017. (U.S. Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Ridge Leoni)

Against a blistering 56 mph wind, an F/A-18F Super Hornet laden with fuel roared off the flight deck of the aircraft carrier Gerald R. Ford and into the brilliant January sky.

No glitches.

Chalk up another step forward for America's newest and most expensive warship.

The Ford has been at sea since Jan. 16, accompanied by Navy test pilots flying a variety of aircraft. They're taking off and landing on the ship's 5 acre flight deck, taking notes and gathering data that will prove valuable for generations of pilots to come.

The Navy calls it aircraft compatibility testing, and the process marks an important new chapter for a first-in-class ship that has seen its share of challenges.

"We're establishing the launch and recovery capabilities for the history of this class, which is pretty amazing," said Capt. J.J. "Yank" Cummings, the Ford's commanding officer. "The crew is extremely proud, and they recognize the historic context of this."

Read More
Soldiers from the 1-118th Field Artillery Regiment of the 48th Infantry Brigade Combat Team fire an M777 Howitzer during a fire mission in Southern Afghanistan, June 10th, 2019. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Jordan Trent)

Once again, the United States and the Taliban are apparently close to striking a peace deal. Such a peace agreement has been rumored to be in the works longer than the latest "Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure" sequel. (The difference is Keanu Reeves has fewer f**ks to give than U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad.)

Both sides appeared to be close to reaching an agreement in September until the Taliban took credit for an attack that killed Army Sgt. 1st Class Elis A. Barreto Ortiz, of the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division. That prompted President Donald Trump to angrily cancel a planned summit with the Taliban that had been scheduled to take place at Camp David, Maryland, on Sept. 8.

Now Taliban spokesman Suhail Shaheen has told a Pakistani newspaper that he is "optimistic" that the Taliban could reach an agreement with U.S. negotiators by the end of January.

Read More
Audie Murphy (U.S. Army photo)

Editor's note: a version of this post first appeared in 2018

On January 26, 1945, the most decorated U.S. service member of World War II earned his legacy in a fiery fashion.

Read More
A Purple Heart (DoD photo)

Florida's two senators are pushing the Defense Department to award Purple Hearts to the U.S. service members wounded in the December shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola.

Read More
Ships from Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 23 transit the Pacific Ocean Jan. 22, 2020. DESRON 23, part of the Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group, is on a scheduled deployment to the Indo-Pacific. (U.S. Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Erick A. Parsons)

Editor's Note: This article by Gina Harkins originally appeared on Military.com, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

The Navy and Marine Corps need to be a bit more short-sighted when assessing how many ships they need, the acting Navy secretary said this week.

The Navy Department is in the middle of a new force-structure review, which could change the number and types of ships the sea services say they'll need to fight future conflicts. But instead of trying to project what they will need three decades out, which has been the case in past assessments, acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly said the services will take a shorter view.

"I don't know what the threat's going to be 30 years from now, but if we're building a force structure for 30 years from now, I would suggest we're probably not building the right one," he said Friday at a National Defense Industrial Association event.

The Navy completed its last force-structure assessment in 2016. That 30-year plan called for a 355-ship fleet.

Read More