I’m A Veteran. Here’s Why I’m Voting For Gary Johnson

Photo via Wikimedia Commons

Editor’s note: To respect the voting process, the identities of those who responded to our prompt are being kept anonymous.

While Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump head the Democratic and Republican parties respectively, the Libertarian party has found hope in former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson. American businessman and author-turned politician, Johnson was also the Libertarian Party's nominee for president of the United States in the 2012 election. This year’s election has been epic, and we’ve only just entered the general — and this run made by a third party has sparked a debated about the two-party system that has controlled the country for decades.

Hundreds of Task & Purpose readers responded to the question: “Are you a veteran voting for Gary Johnson?” and here are 10 responses of those responses.

Related: I'm a veteran. Here's why I'm voting for Donald Trump »

“He is the only logical choice. Trump is a fool and Hillary is a lying traitor. He is for freedom. Is that not what we fought for?”

“Im voting for Gary Johnson because both sides of the aisle have become too polarized. People are so stuck on left or right that they don’t realize that a third party candidate can take good ideas from both sides of the aisle and make for better policies, and that’s what the libertarian party does.”

“I took an oath in 1997 to defend and uphold the constitution, there was no expiration date. Johnson is the only candidate that has been clear on his constitutional view.”

“Hillary is a liar, cheat, and should be in jail. Donald apparently needs counselling, cause he is batshit crazy. The only SANE one in the group is Johnson!”

“He wants the government out of our personal lives. He wants to stop giving money to countries that hate us. Oh and he's neither the criminal Head of the Illuminati nor an attention-craving megalomaniac. So I mean there's that.”

“He's the only trustworthy candidate in the race who is serious about solving actual problems. The left and right are so bitterly partisan, they have no hope of actually compromising and passing reasonable legislation.”

“He has a proven track record as a governor, and he's neither an unhinged lunatic or a public servant with a very long history of questionable, unethical behavior.”

“I plan to vote for Gary again because the other two parties are exactly the damn same-- more war, more surveillance, more spending.”

“I am voting for Johnson because voting for the lesser evil doesn't cut it anymore.”

“Because he's the only candidate who isn't a total scumbag? Because he is going to decrease the amount of Americans in prisons by wielding the power of the executive branch to make marijuana legality a reality? Because he won't follow the dance of military interventionism like our past two administrations, leading to my having fewer dead friends I agree with him on almost all his issues. I believe he is what this country needs moving forward. His track record. Common sense. There is an intellect there that isn't afraid to speak out against the sound bite political culture. A real shot at bringing this country closer than it’s been for decades.”

US Marine Corps

The Marine lieutenant colonel who was removed from command of 1st Reconnaissance Battalion in May is accused of lying to investigators looking into allegations of misconduct, according to a copy of his charge sheet provided to Task & Purpose on Monday.

Read More Show Less

President Donald Trump just can't stop telling stories about former Defense Secretary James Mattis. This time, the president claims Mattis said U.S. troops were so perilously low on ammunition that it would be better to hold off launching a military operation.

"You know, when I came here, three years ago almost, Gen. Mattis told me, 'Sir, we're very low on ammunition,'" Trump recalled on Monday at the White House. "I said, 'That's a horrible thing to say.' I'm not blaming him. I'm not blaming anybody. But that's what he told me because we were in a position with a certain country, I won't say which one; we may have had conflict. And he said to me: 'Sir, if you could, delay it because we're very low on ammunition.'

"And I said: You know what, general, I never want to hear that again from another general," Trump continued. "No president should ever, ever hear that statement: 'We're low on ammunition.'"

Read More Show Less

At least one Air Force base is waging a slow battle against feral hogs — and way, way more than 30-50 of them.

A Texas trapper announced on Monday that his company had removed roughly 1,200 feral hogs from Joint Base San Antonio property at the behest of the service since 2016.

Read More Show Less

In a move that could see President Donald Trump set foot on North Korean soil again, Kim Jong Un has invited the U.S. leader to Pyongyang, a South Korean newspaper reported Monday, as the North's Foreign Ministry said it expected stalled nuclear talks to resume "in a few weeks."

A letter from Kim, the second Trump received from the North Korean leader last month, was passed to the U.S. president during the third week of August and came ahead of the North's launch of short-range projectiles on Sept. 10, the South's Joongang Ilbo newspaper reported, citing multiple people familiar with the matter.

In the letter, Kim expressed his willingness to meet the U.S. leader for another summit — a stance that echoed Trump's own remarks just days earlier.

Read More Show Less

Editor's Note: This article by Oriana Pawlyk originally appeared on Military.com, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

On April 14, 2018, two B-1B Lancer bombers fired off payloads of Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles against weapons storage plants in western Syria, part of a shock-and-awe response to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's use of chemical weapons against his citizens that also included strikes from Navy destroyers and submarines.

In all, the two bombers fired 19 JASSMs, successfully eliminating their targets. But the moment would ultimately be one of the last — and certainly most publicized — strategic strikes for the aircraft before operations began to wind down for the entire fleet.

A few months after the Syria strike, Air Force Global Strike Command commander Gen. Tim Ray called the bombers back home. Ray had crunched the data, and determined the non-nuclear B-1 was pushing its capabilities limit. Between 2006 and 2016, the B-1 was the sole bomber tasked continuously in the Middle East. The assignment was spread over three Lancer squadrons that spent one year at home, then six month deployed — back and forth for a decade.

The constant deployments broke the B-1 fleet. It's no longer a question of if, but when the Air Force and Congress will send the aircraft to the Boneyard. But Air Force officials are still arguing the B-1 has value to offer, especially since it's all the service really has until newer bombers hit the flight line in the mid-2020s.

Read More Show Less