The Loophole That’s Pickpocketing War Widows

Rachelle Vaughn, center, poses with her 18-month-old son Richard next to a picture of her husband, Army Sgt. Richard Vaughn, at their home Tuesday, May 25, 2010 in San Diego.
AP Photo/Gregory Bull

Since its introduction to Congress in January 2013, the Military Surviving Spouses Equity Act has gained momentum among lawmakers. This important bill currently has 237 co-sponsors in the House and 38 in the Senate.

Here’s why it matters: The Survivors Benefits Program / Dependency and Indemnity Compensation offset, which the bill would prevent, is a loophole that effectively allows the government to pickpocket military widows.

The Survivors Benefits Program is provided directly by the Department of Defense to the spouses and children of deceased service members. This allowance was established to provide surviving family members with retirement benefits in event of early death, the survivor outlives the benefits, and inflation.

The Dependency and Indemnity Compensation comes from the Department of Veterans Affairs as a monthly entitlement benefit of $1,233 to be paid to surviving spouses and unmarried children of service members who died while on active duty, or retirees who died of service-connected deaths.

The offset, aka the “Widows’ Tax,” occurs when the government subtracts the value of the VA’s dependency and indemnity compensation from the DoD’s survivors benefit, significantly reducing compensation for the tens of thousands of family members who rely on it.

For example, if a deceased service member’s retirement base coverage is $4,000 per month, the service member’s spouse receives a 55% monthly annuity of $2,200 in survivors’ benefits. The spouse is also awarded the $1,233 monthly dependency and indemnity compensation. Under the offset, the survivors’ benefits net balance is determined by subtracting $1,233 from $2,200 for a total $967. Therefore, the net survivors’ benefits total, plus $1,233 in indemnity compensation, equals $2,200 per month compared to $3,433 the spouse would receive if the offset was repealed. Additionally, dependency and indemnity compensations are exempt from federal and state income taxes, unlike survivors’ benefits, giving the surviving spouse more take-home income and making it worth applying for.

According to an Army Times article, a repeal of the offset would cost an estimated $433 million in 2014 and $6.3 billion over the next 10 years; yet as of 2013, it was unclear where this funding would come from. However, the result would support over 60,000 military family beneficiaries. Of that population, 3,700 are widows and widowers from the past 12 years of foreign conflict, according to non-profit organization Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors.

Even with the tremendous efforts of dozens of lawmakers, military organizations, non-profit organizations, and surviving family members, passage of the Military Surviving Spouses Equity Act has not been successful. Critics cry “welfare state” when the subject is brought to the discussion table, however, no group has formally stepped out against the bill. The overwhelming majority see the offset as unfair and unjust, the “pay-as-you-go” budgetary model our congressional leaders adhere to still seems unfounded, according to Steve Strobridge, the director of government relations for the Military Officers Association of America.

House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel Chairman and Rep. Joe Wilson, a Republican from South Carolina, introduced the Military Surviving Equity Act of 2013, stating, “As devastating casualties [sic] occur, it is of utmost importance and our responsibility to keep the faith with our service members by taking proper care of their families in the event of death.” The act was referred to the House Subcommittee on Military Personnel in January 2013 where it continues to sit.

During the years leading up to the formal introduction of the Military Surviving Spouses Equity Act, military widows were appeased by Congress with the Special Survivor Indemnity Allowance. Beginning in October 2008, this is paid out monthly stipends to survivors who are affected by the offset, however, payments will be terminated October 2017, barring any intervention from Congress to extend them.

Indemnity allowances are not enough. This provision is only a temporary assistance. The passage of the Military Surviving Spouses Equity Act is crucial to honoring those who have fallen and creating awareness of the Survivors Benefits Program / Dependency and Indemnity Compensation offset is only the beginning.

Below are links with more information about the widows’ tax and how to contact your congressmen and senators to encourage them to pass this important bill to honor the sacrifices of fallen service members.

VA-Office of Survivors Assistance FAQ: A resource for anyone wanting to understand how to apply for benefits and which benefits survivors of a deceased service member are entitled to.

A Survivors Guide to Benefits: A comprehensive booklet given to all spouses after the passing of a service member detailing the process and how to utilize the resources available.

Military Officer Association of America Legislative Action Center: Chronicles the changes to the Military Surviving Spouses Equity Act, contains the co-sponsor list as well as members of Congress who have not been contacted or responded.

Air Force Retiree Services: Provides examples of how the offset directly affects current compensation and benefits.

ABC News anchor Tom Llamas just before his network airs grossly inaccurate footage

Video footage of a purported "bombing of Kurd civilians" by Turkish military forces shown on ABC News appeared to be a nighttime firing of tracer rounds at a Kentucky gun range.

Read More Show Less

For U.S. service members who have fought alongside the Kurds, President Donald Trump's decision to approve repositioning U.S. forces in Syria ahead of Turkey's invasion is a naked betrayal of valued allies.

"I am ashamed for the first time in my career," one unnamed special operator told Fox News Jennifer Griffin.

In a Twitter thread that went viral, Griffin wrote the soldier told her the Kurds were continuing to support the United States by guarding tens of thousands of ISIS prisoners even though Turkey had nullified an arrangement under which U.S. and Turkish troops were conducting joint patrols in northeastern Syria to allow the Kurdish People's Protection Units, or YPG, to withdraw.

"The Kurds are sticking by us," the soldier told Griffin. "No other partner I have ever dealt with would stand by us."

Read More Show Less

The U.S. military's seemingly never-ending mission supporting civil authorities along the southwestern border will last at least another year.

On Sept. 3, Defense Secretary Mark Esper approved a request from the Department of Homeland Security to provide a total of up to 5,500 troops along the border until Sept. 30, 2020, Lt. Gen. Laura Richardson, commander of U.S. Army North, said on Monday.

Read More Show Less

Editor's note: This article by Gina Harkins originally appeared on, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

On Aug. 16, two 7-ton trucks collided aboard Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California. Thirty Marines were sent to the hospital.

Read More Show Less

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia announced on Monday it would hold a large test of its Strategic Missile Forces that will see it fire ballistic and cruise missiles from the land, sea and air this week.

The exercise, from Oct. 15-17, will involve around 12,000 military personnel, as well as aircraft, including strategic nuclear bombers, surface ships and submarines, Russia's Ministry of Defense said in a statement.

Read More Show Less