Why Is The Marine Corps Gazette Undermining The Corps On Women In Combat?

Community
Photo by Lance Cpl. Trevon S. Peracca

About 18 months ago, I submitted an article to the Marine Corps Gazette about integrating women into the combat arms. I received an unexpected response from the editor stating that the Gazette was not interested in articles that were “thinly veiled ad hominem attacks on the Commandant.” The Armed Forces Journal took a different view and published my article. In the intervening year, I have watched the Gazette publish multiple articles that patently support an anti-women Marines stance. But the most egregious example is the article that the Gazette published this month with the tagline that it had received first place in the Maj. General Harold W. Chase essay contest. This article, “Why Women Don’t Belong in the Infantry,” garnered a number of heated responses from both men and women. Two noteworthy challenges came from Marine men. The Gazette published one piece that challenged why this was an award-worthy article, saying that it is “neither bold nor daring” to advocate for the status quo. The other called the article “sororicide” because it was written by a woman who said that women who want to serve this country in the infantry are selfish.


Last week, I attended the quarterly meeting of the Defense Advisory Council on women in the services. During opening remarks, Council Chairwoman Holly Hemphill called attention to the Gazette article. Although her comments were civil, it was clear that she could barely contain her anger over the article that she said undermined women Marines. When the Marine Corps’ representative, Col. Anne Weinberg, took the podium to present the Corps’ combat integration update briefing, she began by distancing the Marine Corps from the article stating that the Gazette is a private publication and not an official Marine Corps publication. Is this true?

A check of the Marine Corps Gazette’s website reveals the close relationship between the Corps and this “private publication.” First, the Gazette is a publication of the Marine Corps Association and Foundation which is “the professional association for ALL Marines.” The foundation has over 76,000 active-duty, reserve and retired Marine members and is led by a board of directors, nearly all of whom are retired or active-duty Marines. Second, the Gazette is touted as “the professional journal of U.S. Marines” and is also headed by retired Marine officers. Finally, both the foundation and the Gazette have offices inside the gate on Marine Corps Base Quantico. Clearly, the Gazette is at least an endorsed magazine of the U.S. Marine Corps.

So, why does the Marine Corps continue to allow the Gazette to publish articles that undermine women Marines and an integration effort they are clearly working toward? I would like to think that they have done so in the spirit of open debate, but in light of my own experience with the Gazette, I think otherwise. Not only was I not able to get my thoughts published in the Gazette, but with just a few exceptions, almost every article the Gazette has published about integrating women into combat units and branches has been against women. And now, not only have they published yet another article that says that women don’t belong, they have given the author a prestigious award.

The Marine Corps’ professional association has clearly come down on one side of this debate while the institution moves forward in the other direction with full integration. Having the institution’s efforts undermined by its professional association is confusing at best and destructive at worst. It is confusing because Marines are left to wonder if the Gazetteis providing an “unofficial” position of the Marine Corps. It is destructive because it says to the dozens of women Marines who have successfully completed the enlisted infantry training course that they made a mistake. It says that they shouldn’t have gone, they don’t belong, and their accomplishments aren’t valued.

Recent statements by active-duty Marine leaders, supported by an upcoming “60 Minutes” report, show that the Marine Corps leadership is fully committed to including qualified women Marines in the ground combat elements of the Marine Corps. The Gazette’s articles are undermining, not only the efforts of the institution to foster a fully inclusive Corps, but the respect afforded to women Marines. The Marine Corps needs to reign in its professional association or publicly distance itself from its activities.

Islamic state members walk in the last besieged neighborhood in the village of Baghouz, Deir Al Zor province, Syria February 18, 2019. (Reuters/Rodi Said)

NEAR BAGHOUZ, Syria (Reuters) - The Islamic State appeared closer to defeat in its last enclave in eastern Syria on Wednesday, as a civilian convoy left the besieged area where U.S.-backed forces estimate a few hundred jihadists are still holed up.

Read More Show Less
U.S. Air Force Airmen assigned to the 317th Airlift Wing walk to waiting family members and friends after stepping off of a C-130J Super Hercules at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, Sept. 17, 2018 (U.S. Air Force/Airman 1st Class Mercedes Porter)

Editor's Note: This article by Gina Harkins originally appeared on Military.com, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

The U.S. Air Force has issued new guidelines for active-duty, reserve and National Guard airmen who are considered non-deployable, and officials will immediately begin flagging those who have been unable to deploy for 12 consecutive months for separation consideration.

Read More Show Less
Pictured left to right: Pedro Pascal ("Catfish"), Garrett Hedlund ("Ben"), Charlie Hunnam ("Ironhead"), and Ben Affleck ("Redfly") Photo Courtesy of Netflix

A new trailer for Netflix's Triple Frontier dropped last week, and it looks like a gritty mash-up of post-9/11 war dramas Zero Dark Thirty and Hurt Locker and crime thrillers Narcos and The Town.

Read More Show Less
Army Sgt. Daniel Cowart gets a hug from then-Dallas Cowboys defensive end Chris Canty. Photo: Department of Defense

The Distinguished Service Cross was made for guys like Sgt. Daniel Cowart, who literally tackled and "engaged...in hand to hand combat" a man wearing a suicide vest while he was on patrol in Iraq.

So it's no wonder he's having his Silver Star upgraded to the second-highest military award.

Read More Show Less
A small unmanned aerial vehicle built by service academy cadets is shown here flying above ground. This type of small UAV was used by cadets and midshipmen from the U.S. Air Force Academy, the U.S. Military Academy and the U.S. Naval Academy, during a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency-sponsored competition at Camp Roberts, California, April 23-25, 2017. During the competition, cadets and midshipmen controlled small UAVs in "swarm" formations to guard territory on the ground at Camp Roberts. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Drones have been used in conflicts across the globe and will play an even more important role in the future of warfare. But, the future of drones in combat will be different than what we have seen before.

The U.S. military can set itself apart from others by embracing autonomous drone warfare through swarming — attacking an enemy from multiple directions through dispersed and pulsing attacks. There is already work being done in this area: The U.S. military tested its own drone swarm in 2017, and the UK announced this week it would fund research into drone swarms that could potentially overwhelm enemy air defenses.

I propose we look to the amoeba, a single-celled organism, as a model for autonomous drones in swarm warfare. If we were to use the amoeba as this model, then we could mimic how the organism propels itself by changing the structure of its body with the purpose of swarming and destroying an enemy.

Read More Show Less