Ralph Lauren's Combat Chic Sweater Is Sure To Turn Heads, And Give Your Sgt Maj An Aneurysm

popular
The Do's And Don'ts Of Using The Marine Corps' IP

There's a lot to be said about "tacticool" attire, trinkets, and gizmos. So much so that I've dedicated an embarrassing amount of time to writing silly posts on bespoke tactical vests, combat kicks, overpriced dress blue knockoffs, $30 reflective belts, and so much more.

And it's time for another.


Mota, mota, got a lotta faux motivation!Ralph Lauren

This Fleece Graphic Sweatshirt from Ralph Lauren was originally priced at $125, but is now just $34.99. Who can believe it? Now, if you're looking at that and thinking "hmm, there's something familiar about this," you're not alone.

Originally surfaced on Twitter by The Warax, along with a number of other mil-inspired items, the sweater features a logo that's visually similar to the Marine Corps' Eagle, Globe, and Anchor emblem. However, when reached for comment, the Marine Corps Trademark Licensing Office could not confirm at this time whether or not the logo violated the service's existing trademarks — which are extensive, and were the subject of a previous Task & Purpose article.

The designer's site doesn't include any additional information on where the inspiration came from, nor does it say it who Ralph Lauren's Marauders were, though some Twitter users have speculated:

While these items are a source of amusement for most, and the cause of vein-popping rage for a few, clothing companies have been making bank on military-inspired swag for decades, and they're not going to stop anytime soon. And why should they? In fact, I say we flip the script: It's time some active duty service-members shell out outrageous sums of money for knock-off military swag, just to see what happens when they sport it on base.

And here's a totally accurate rendering of what that might look like:


SEE ALSO: USM©: Inside The Marine Corps' Heated Campaign To Protect Its Sacred Brand

WATCH NEXT: Jack Mandaville's Guide To Vetsplaining

The FBI is treating the recent shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, as a terrorist attack, several media outlets reported on Sunday.

"We work with the presumption that this was an act of terrorism," USA Today quoted FBI Agent Rachel Rojas as saying at a news conference.

Read More Show Less
(U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Vaughan Dill/Released)

The three sailors whose lives were cut short by a gunman at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, on Friday "showed exceptional heroism and bravery in the face of evil," said base commander Navy Capt. Tim Kinsella.

Ensign Joshua Kaleb Watson, Airman Mohammed Sameh Haitham, and Airman Apprentice Cameron Scott Walters were killed in the shooting, the Navy has announced.

Read More Show Less

This article originally appeared on Business Insider.

SIMI VALLEY, Calif. – Gen. David Berger, the US Marine Corps commandant, suggested the concerns surrounding a service members' use of questionable Chinese-owned apps like TikTok should be directed against the military's leadership, rather than the individual troops.

Speaking at the Reagan National Defense Forum in Simi Valley, California, on Saturday morning, Berger said the younger generation of troops had a "clearer view" of the technology "than most people give them credit for."

"That said, I'd give us a 'C-minus' or a 'D' in educating the force on the threat of even technology," Berger said. "Because they view it as two pieces of gear, 'I don't see what the big deal is.'"

Read More Show Less

WASHINGTON/SEOUL (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un risks losing "everything" if he resumes hostility and his country must denuclearize, after the North said it had carried out a "successful test of great significance."

"Kim Jong Un is too smart and has far too much to lose, everything actually, if he acts in a hostile way. He signed a strong Denuclearization Agreement with me in Singapore," Trump said on Twitter, referring to his first summit with Kim in Singapore in 2018.

"He does not want to void his special relationship with the President of the United States or interfere with the U.S. Presidential Election in November," he said.

Read More Show Less

The Pentagon has a credibility problem that is the result of the White House's scorched earth policy against any criticism. As a result, all statements from senior leaders are suspect.

We're beyond the point of defense officials being unable to say for certain whether a dog is a good boy or girl. Now we're at the point where the Pentagon has spent three days trying to knock down a Wall Street Journal story about possible deployments to the Middle East, and they've failed to persuade either the press or Congress.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the United States was considering deploying up to 14,000 troops to the Middle East to thwart any potential Iranian attacks. The story made clear that President Trump could ultimately decide to send a smaller number of service members, but defense officials have become fixated on the number 14,000 as if it were the only option on the table.

Read More Show Less