Dear Microsoft workers protesting the Army: Have you heard of PowerPoint?

Cris Weisbecker, Education Services Officer at the Wiesbaden Education Center, gives a presentation to U.S. Army Signal Soldiers about higher education opportunities and Army services during the 102nd Strategic Signal Battalion, 2nd Theater Signal Brigade, quarterly Soldier Development Program Jan. 18, 2018 in Wiesbaden, Germany. The Soldier Development Program provides Soldiers with information on a wide variety of personal and professional topics, including higher education, designed to grow junior Soldiers into future leaders. (U.S. Army photo by William B. King) (Photo Credit: William King)

In a recent open letter to Microsoft President Brad Smith and CEO Satya Nadella, a group of Microsoft workers demanded that Microsoft cancel its $479 million contract with the United States Army. Established last year, this contract committed Microsoft to supply technology for the Army's Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS), leveraging its HoloLens augmented reality technology to design headsets for use in combat and training. The letter is the workers' refutation of creating technology for "warfare and oppression," arguing that the contract is Microsoft's foray into weapons development.

Rather than provide insight or commentary on the ethics of corporate cooperation with government, the letter lays bear the signatories' ignorance of warfare and combat trauma.

It is virtue signaling masquerading as thought leadership.

Their liberal use of the word 'weapon development' to describe what amounts to an integrated headset is paradoxical considering the current widespread, mandatory use of the Microsoft Office suite in the Department of Defense. This global coalition of Microsoft workers concerned about their part in the perpetuation of conflict need look no further than Microsoft Outlook or PowerPoint — tools that are used daily to craft, communicate, and execute operational plans.

Microsoft Office, alone, has done more to facilitate America's use of military force than nearly any weapon system in our arsenal. The use of deadly force matters little if we cannot communicate when and for whom. If they were serious about change, they would demand Microsoft revoke its license agreement with our government.

While the Army describes the project as a way to increase "lethality, mobility, and situational awareness necessary to achieve overmatch against our current and future adversaries," it remains unclear how this technology would accomplish that goal. Available information regarding the project suggests the headsets will merely integrate existing technology, such as night vision capability, or integrated physiological features detecting and displaying "soldier readiness," into one package.

However, the coalition of Microsoft workers conclude that such technology will turn warfare into a "simulated video game, further distancing soldiers from the grim stakes of war and the reality of bloodshed." By their words it is easy to believe that this Microsoft technology might be used to turn real life into a cartoonish version of itself.

But that is neither the intent nor the purpose of the Army's IVAS. As those who have used night vision devices in an operational environment can tell you, the green glow cast by such devices does not disallow the sights, smells, or sounds of death. It does not prevent the wearer from deeply feeling the threat to their own life or those around them, a potential precursor to the development of post traumatic stress disorder.

The reality of bloodshed is in the blood shed itself, not the fancy equipment a soldier carries.

Army speak aside, this technology appears to be more related to preserving soldier life than increasing enemy dead.

Values and ethics matter but not when they are cherry-picked for personal effect.

It appears the authors' have forgotten the history of their own field. Colossus, an electronic digital programmable computer, was invented to decipher messages sent by Nazi encryption machines and birthed the age of the modern computer. The world wide web exists today because of the Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET) that answered the need for a connected computer system during the Cold War. Or global positioning systems (GPS), a project launched by the Department of Defense in 1973. Or microwave ovens, a technology developed during World War II. Or penicillin or canned food or wristwatches or EpiPens or blood banks and blood transfusions.

It's easy to accept that a headset might somehow engender a sense of distance on the battlefield, when living behind a computer screen has apparently done just that. The letter is a reflection of their own experience, a display of their personal distance generated by the technology they helped create.

Meaghan Mobbs is a clinical psychology predoctoral fellow at Columbia University, where she specializes in veteran and military issues. A West Point graduate and Afghanistan veteran, she is a George W. Bush Institute Veteran Leadership Scholar and Tillman Military Scholar. She is currently a President Trump appointee to the United States Military Academy Board of Visitors.

SEE ALSO: 'We do not want to become war profiteers' — Microsoft employees outraged over Army HoloLens contract

US Marine Corps

The Marine lieutenant colonel who was removed from command of 1st Reconnaissance Battalion in May is accused of lying to investigators looking into allegations of misconduct, according to a copy of his charge sheet provided to Task & Purpose on Monday.

Read More Show Less

President Donald Trump just can't stop telling stories about former Defense Secretary James Mattis. This time, the president claims Mattis said U.S. troops were so perilously low on ammunition that it would be better to hold off launching a military operation.

"You know, when I came here, three years ago almost, Gen. Mattis told me, 'Sir, we're very low on ammunition,'" Trump recalled on Monday at the White House. "I said, 'That's a horrible thing to say.' I'm not blaming him. I'm not blaming anybody. But that's what he told me because we were in a position with a certain country, I won't say which one; we may have had conflict. And he said to me: 'Sir, if you could, delay it because we're very low on ammunition.'

"And I said: You know what, general, I never want to hear that again from another general," Trump continued. "No president should ever, ever hear that statement: 'We're low on ammunition.'"

Read More Show Less

At least one Air Force base is waging a slow battle against feral hogs — and way, way more than 30-50 of them.

A Texas trapper announced on Monday that his company had removed roughly 1,200 feral hogs from Joint Base San Antonio property at the behest of the service since 2016.

Read More Show Less

In a move that could see President Donald Trump set foot on North Korean soil again, Kim Jong Un has invited the U.S. leader to Pyongyang, a South Korean newspaper reported Monday, as the North's Foreign Ministry said it expected stalled nuclear talks to resume "in a few weeks."

A letter from Kim, the second Trump received from the North Korean leader last month, was passed to the U.S. president during the third week of August and came ahead of the North's launch of short-range projectiles on Sept. 10, the South's Joongang Ilbo newspaper reported, citing multiple people familiar with the matter.

In the letter, Kim expressed his willingness to meet the U.S. leader for another summit — a stance that echoed Trump's own remarks just days earlier.

Read More Show Less

Editor's Note: This article by Oriana Pawlyk originally appeared on, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

On April 14, 2018, two B-1B Lancer bombers fired off payloads of Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles against weapons storage plants in western Syria, part of a shock-and-awe response to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's use of chemical weapons against his citizens that also included strikes from Navy destroyers and submarines.

In all, the two bombers fired 19 JASSMs, successfully eliminating their targets. But the moment would ultimately be one of the last — and certainly most publicized — strategic strikes for the aircraft before operations began to wind down for the entire fleet.

A few months after the Syria strike, Air Force Global Strike Command commander Gen. Tim Ray called the bombers back home. Ray had crunched the data, and determined the non-nuclear B-1 was pushing its capabilities limit. Between 2006 and 2016, the B-1 was the sole bomber tasked continuously in the Middle East. The assignment was spread over three Lancer squadrons that spent one year at home, then six month deployed — back and forth for a decade.

The constant deployments broke the B-1 fleet. It's no longer a question of if, but when the Air Force and Congress will send the aircraft to the Boneyard. But Air Force officials are still arguing the B-1 has value to offer, especially since it's all the service really has until newer bombers hit the flight line in the mid-2020s.

Read More Show Less