Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
Navy reassigns prosecutor caught trying to spy on Gallagher defense team before trial
"In an effort to move the [Region Legal Service Office Southwest] Trial Department forward, Capt. Jennie Goldsmith, the new commanding officer, has reassigned the previous Senior Trial Counsel, Cmdr. Chris Czaplak to Code 67 (Technology, Operations, and Plans)," Cmdr. Jereal Dorsey, a Navy spokesman, said in a statement to Task & Purpose.
"The role of Senior Trial Counsel at RLSO SW will now be filled by Cmdr. Phil Hamon," Dorsey added.
Hamon, a Navy officer since 2000, had been serving with Naval Surface Force Pacific at Coronado, California since June 2018, according to an official bio.
Czaplak's reassignment to the Washington Navy Yard comes days after the Navy ordered a "comprehensive review" of the Judge Advocate General's Corps on Aug. 1. Though the Navy's announcement said Czaplak was "reassigned," the move is clearly a demotion to what appears to be a desk job following a stint as the top Navy prosecutor in San Diego.
The JAG's Technology, Operations, & Plans Division "provides policy guidance, statistical research and analysis, and information technology (IT) resources, management, and assets in support of daily operations, ensuring that such IT assets are available, interoperable, and secure, and meet mission requirements," according to its website.
The removal of Czaplak from the Gallagher case came in response to a defense motion in May seeking his ouster prior to trial, after defense attorneys learned that an NCIS investigation into media leaks in the case had involved him sending emails to defense attorneys and a Navy Times reporter without obtaining a warrant.
The emails had some kind of tracking software hidden in Czaplak's signature block, which was discovered almost immediately.
"The court concludes that the matter related to Cmdr. Czaplak's participation in the NCIS operation may reasonably create a conflict requiring his withdrawal under due process," Capt. Aaron Rugh, the judge, said in a June ruling on the issue, which removed him from the case.
"While it is not within the purview of this court to conclude whether the actions of a trial counsel violated the rules of professional responsibility, the court must determine whether the fear of or potential danger of a professional responsibility complaint and follow up investigation is sufficient to create such a conflict. Conceding that this area remains both nuanced and unresolved under the ethical rules, still the court concludes that the danger of investigation is sufficiently real that any trial counsel so situated might be motivated by factors unrelated to his position as trial counsel."
In addition to the sudden departure of Czaplak, the Navy on Monday relieved the RLSO commanding officer 14 days ahead of schedule in what it called an "accelerated change of command ceremony," according to Navy Times.
Czaplak did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Task & Purpose.
Jeremiah Sullivan, an attorney who received the tracking code sent by Czaplak while working on a companion case, declined to comment.
Tim Parlatore, a civilian attorney for Gallagher, told Task & Purpose in a statement Czaplak "should have been fired the moment his illegal conduct" was confirmed by the court.
"While it is a good step to ensure that he can no longer participate directly in prosecutorial misconduct, it is a bit disconcerting that the officer who conducts an illegal email spying operation is now reassigned to a unit that is responsible for 'Oversight and governance of IT Assets,'" Parlatore added.
Despite what you may have heard, the Army has not declared war on mustaches.
The Army W.T.F! Moments Facebook page on Monday posted a memo written by a 3rd Infantry Division company commander telling his soldiers that only the fittest among them will be allowed to sprout facial hair under their warrior nostrils.
"During my tenure at Battle Company, I have noticed a direct correlation between mustaches and a lack of physical fitness," the memo says. "In an effort to increase the physical fitness of Battle Company, mustaches will not be authorized for any soldier earning less than a 300 on the APFT [Army Physical Fitness Test]."
The Defense Visual Information Distribution Service (DVIDS) is the largest official database of U.S. military media available for public consumption. It is also an occasional source of unexpected laughs, like this gem from a live fire exercise that a public affairs officer simply tagged 'Fire mortar boom.' In the world of droll data entry and too many acronyms, sometimes little jokes are their own little form of rebellion, right?
But some DVIDS uploads, however, come with captions and titles that cut right to the core, perfectly capturing the essence of life in the U.S. military in a way that makes you sigh, facepalm, and utter a mournful, 'too real.'
The US military does not need Iraqi permission to provide close air support or evacuate wounded troops in 'emergency circumstances'
The U.S. military does not need Iraqi permission to fly close air support and casualty evacuation missions for U.S. troops in combat, a top spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition fighting ISIS clarified on Tuesday.
Army Col. James Rawlinson clarified that the Iraqis do not need to approve missions in emergency circumstances after Task & Purpose reported on Monday that the U.S. military needed permission to fly CAS missions for troops in a fight.
It all began with a medical check.
Carson Thomas, a healthy and fit 20-year-old infantryman who had joined the Army after a brief stint in college, figured he should tell the medics about the pain in his groin he had been feeling. It was Feb. 12, 2012, and the senior medic looked him over and decided to send him to sick call at the base hospital.
It seemed almost routine, something the Army doctors would be able to diagnose and fix so he could get back to being a grunt.
Now looking back on what happened some seven years later, it was anything but routine.