Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
New Tattoo Policy Lets Marines Get Wedding Ring Ink, But Not Sleeves
Editor’s Note: This article by Hope Hodge Seck originally appeared on Military.com, the premier source of information for the military and veteran community.
The Corps will now let Marines wear slightly bigger arm band tattoos, but the popular sleeves — ink covering most or all of a person's arm — are still banned, according to a detailed new policy published Thursday.
Also new: Marines are allowed to get a small tattoo on the finger of one hand — a nod to the popular practice of getting a tattoo in lieu of a wedding ring.
But those looking for major changes to the Corps' long-standing tattoo prohibitions will be disappointed. The new policy still prohibits Marines from inking hands, feets wrists, and necks. And for officers, the policy still limits the number of tattoos visible in physical training gear to four.
All these updates are included in an extensive 32-page bulletin that instructs Marines on not only where tattoos are permitted, but how to measure their tattoos using their hands and visual references to ensure compliance.
The Marine Corps launched a review of its tattoo policy in March 2015 after then-commandant Gen. Joseph Dunford and Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps Ronald Green fielded numerous questions about the rules during a tour of Marine bases.
In 2007 and 2010, 34th Commandant James Conway introduced a number of unpopular tattoo prohibitions that banned sleeves and limited tattoo size everywhere else in an effort to develop a more professional appearance for Marines.
"The Commandant said it best … that we've attempted to balance the individual desires of Marines with the need to maintain the disciplined appearance expected of our profession," Green said in a statement Thursday. "I think we have accomplished just that … We took the time we felt this policy deserved, we wanted to make sure we got it right."
The new tattoo policy still prohibits sexist, racist, obscene and extremist tattoo content. Chest or back tattoos can be unlimited in number, but must be entirely covered by a crew-neck T-shirt.
Band tattoos, which extend around the circumference of an arm or leg, can be three inches wide, or the width of the Marines' four fingers extended and joined, whichever is greater. This is an inch wider than the previous policy allowed for band tattoos.
Tattoos on elbows and knees are still prohibited, but the policy allows a single tattoo below the knee or the elbow as long as it can be covered completely by the Marine's hand. The Marine can also get a collection of small tattoos that fit underneath a hand, or a band tattoo instead.
If female Marines have visible tattoos on their legs, they must wear slacks instead of a skirt in the service and dress uniforms.
Starting now, Marines have 120 days to get non-compliant tattoos formally documented in their personnel file. Enlisted Marines will have their tattoos reviewed for compliance whenever they submit a retention package for reenlistment, and officers will be reviewed for tattoos at each promotion board.
The new policy warns that enlisted Marines who wish to pursue a commission as an officer should make sure their tattoos comply with the standards for officers limiting visible tattoos to four. And for those considering special duty assignments, such as Marine security guard or drill instructor, the policy warns that even regulation tattoos might limit their options.
Marines will not receive special duty assignments if any of their visible tattoos do not comply with the new regulations.
And "a tattoo may not be specifically prohibited, but could prevent future commissioning or duty assignments," states the policy, signed by Commandant Gen. Robert Neller.
The policy comes in sharp contrast to a tattoo update recently released by the Navy that permits neck tattoos for the first time and lifts tattoo size restrictions entirely. Navy officials said the new policy was an acknowledgement of the popularity of tattoos with the youngest generation of sailors a key recruiting population for the service.
In March, Marine Corps Manpower and Reserve Affairs Deputy Commandant Lt. Gen. Mark Brilakis told Military.com it was unlikely the Marine Corps would relax standards that significantly.
"I can tell you right now that not everybody is going to be happy," he said. "The Marine Corps is an organization that prides itself on its relationship with the American people. We've got a history of being a smart, well-groomed professional force, and this commandant has no intention of walking away from any of those precepts. And so this tattoo policy will be respecting individual desires but also understanding that we are a military force."
In a statement, Green said Neller wanted to make sure Marines knew they were being listened to with the new tattoo policy.
"He's allowed more skin area for tattoos in an effort to balance the Marine's desires with the Grooming Standards of the Marine Corps," Green said. "He wanted the policy to allow Marines freedom and flexibility to express themselves, while also being clearly written and understandable for both Marines and their leadership."
This article originally appeared on Military.com.
More from Military.com:
NASA is reportedly investigating one of its astronauts in a case that appears to involve the first allegations of criminal activity from space.
Hackers could have breached US bioterrorism defenses for years, records show. We'll never know if they did
The Department of Homeland Security stored sensitive data from the nation's bioterrorism defense program on an insecure website where it was vulnerable to attacks by hackers for over a decade, according to government documents reviewed by The Los Angeles Times.
The data included the locations of at least some BioWatch air samplers, which are installed at subway stations and other public locations in more than 30 U.S. cities and are designed to detect anthrax or other airborne biological weapons, Homeland Security officials confirmed. It also included the results of tests for possible pathogens, a list of biological agents that could be detected and response plans that would be put in place in the event of an attack.
The information — housed on a dot-org website run by a private contractor — has been moved behind a secure federal government firewall, and the website was shut down in May. But Homeland Security officials acknowledge they do not know whether hackers ever gained access to the data.
The State Department doesn't really care if its human rights training for partner security forces is working or not
By law, the United States is required to promote "human rights and fundamental freedoms" when it trains foreign militaries. So it makes sense that if the U.S. government is going to spend billions on foreign security assistance every year, it should probably systematically track whether that human rights training is actually having an impact or not, right?
Apparently not. According to a new audit from the Government Accountability Office, both the Departments of Defense and State "have not assessed the effectiveness of human rights training for foreign security forces" — and while the Pentagon agreed to establish a process to do so, State simply can't be bothered.
A Kansas VA hospital police supervisor reported 'dangerous' deficiencies among his officers. Now he says he faced retaliation
The Kansas City VA Medical Center is still dealing with the fallout of a violent confrontation last year between one of its police officers and a patient, with the Kansas City Police Department launching a homicide investigation.
And now Topeka's VA hospital is dealing with an internal dispute between leaders of its Veterans Affairs police force that raises new questions about how the agency nationwide treats patients — and the officers who report misconduct by colleagues.
A New Mexico woman was charged Friday in the robbery and homicide of a Marine Corps veteran from Belen late last month after allegedly watching her boyfriend kill the man and torch his car to hide evidence.