---
title: "Soldiers are finally getting a robot mule that can haul 1,000 pounds of gear"
date: "2020-06-08"
modified: "2020-06-08"
authors:
  - name: "Jared Keller"
    job_title: "Former Managing Editor"
    link: "https://taskandpurpose.com/authors/jaredkeller/"
url: "https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-robot-mule-fielding-date/"
categories:
  - "Army"
  - "Around the World"
  - "Military Branches"
  - "News"
  - "Tech & Tactics"
  - "United States"
  - "Vehicles"
tags:
  - "Northern Command"
---

# Soldiers are finally getting a robot mule that can haul 1,000 pounds of gear

![](<https://taskandpurpose.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/max1200-1-3.jpg>)

The Army is poised to award a contract this month to produce hundreds of robotic mules to tackle the scourge of hauling tons of gear and other bullshit downrange, the service [announced](<https://www.army.mil/article/236204/small_robotic_mule_other_unmanned_ground_systems_on_the_horizon>) last week.

The service will [award](<https://www.army.mil/article/236204/small_robotic_mule_other_unmanned_ground_systems_on_the_horizon>) a contract to one of four defense contractors — General Dynamics Land Systems, Textron subsidiary Howe & Howe, a team of Applied Research Associates and Polaris Defense, and HDT Expeditionary Systems — to produce its tracked Small Multipurpose Equipment Transport (SMET) planned to be fielded[ some time in fiscal year 2021](<https://www.army.mil/article/236204/small_robotic_mule_other_unmanned_ground_systems_on_the_horizon>).

Each SMET will haul 1,000 pounds, operate over 60 miles in a three-day period, and generate a kilowatt when moving and 3 kilowatts when stationary to recharge both its batteries and assorted equipment, [according](<https://www.army.mil/article/236204/small_robotic_mule_other_unmanned_ground_systems_on_the_horizon>) to the Army.

The four defense contractors [originally furnished](<https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/06/12/army-hopes-field-robotic-mules-carry-gear-next-year.html>) 20 platforms each to soldiers assigned to the 10th Mountain and 101st Airborne divisions for a months-long operational test demonstration last year.

[According](<https://www.army.mil/article/236204/small_robotic_mule_other_unmanned_ground_systems_on_the_horizon>) to the Army, soldier feedback led to "increasing the S-MET’s carrying capacity and mobility, creating alternative methods for casualty evacuation and robotic obscuration, as well as reducing its noise."

“Soldiers think outside the box,” [said](<https://www.army.mil/article/236204/small_robotic_mule_other_unmanned_ground_systems_on_the_horizon>) Col. Christopher Barnwell, director of the Joint Modernization Command’s Field Experimentation Division, in a [statement](<https://www.army.mil/article/236204/small_robotic_mule_other_unmanned_ground_systems_on_the_horizon>).

While the Army initially awarded a $162 million contract to GDLS in November, the service in February opted to allow the four contractors to recompete for the privilege of building the mule, after Textron protested to the Government Accountability Office.

Tetron claimed that GDLS "had been allowed to change its vehicle significantly following a soldier evaluation phase, which made the evaluation invalid even though an award was contingent on such an assessment from users," Defense News [reported](<https://www.defensenews.com/land/2020/02/18/after-protest-army-launches-new-competition-for-robotic-mule/>).

With fielding scheduled for the second quarter of fiscal year 2021, the Army wants to field a total of 624 vehicles to soldiers by the middle of fiscal year 2024, [according](<https://www.army.mil/article/236204/small_robotic_mule_other_unmanned_ground_systems_on_the_horizon>) to the Army Acquisition Support Center.

While the SMET program was [initiated](<https://www.ndia.org/-/media/sites/ndia/divisions/robotics/mr-bryan-mcveigh.ashx?la=en>) under a directed requirement in April 2017, the Defense Department has been eyeing plans for a robotic pack mules [for the better part of the last decade](<https://www.theverge.com/2015/12/29/10682746/boston-dynamics-big-dog-ls3-marines-development-shelved>).

In 2015, the Marine Corps decided to shelve plans to field a Legged Squad Support System robot mule after the $42 million, two-and-a-half year development effort between the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Boston Dynamics yielded a prototype that was [simply too noisy for operational use](<https://www.military.com/daily-news/2015/12/22/marine-corps-shelves-futuristic-robo-mule-due-to-noise-concerns.html>).

While it's unclear if noise is a major issue with the existing tracked SMET effort, one other major question remains: With U.S. troops hauling hundreds of pounds of gear downrange, what happens when this robotic bad boy happens to break down during a march?

## Author
Jared Keller is the former managing editor of Task & Purpose. His writing has appeared in Aeon, the Los Angeles Review of Books, the New Republic, Pacific Standard, Smithsonian, and The Washington Post, among other publications.

### Author social links  
[Twitter](<https://twitter.com/jaredbkeller>)  
[Facebook](<https://www.facebook.com/jaredbkeller>)  
[LinkedIn](<https://www.linkedin.com/in/jaredbkeller/>)  
[Instagram](<https://www.instagram.com/jaredbkelller/>)