--- title: "The Pentagon brings back World War II-era OSS for special operations missions, funding" description: "The plan could enhance civilian oversight and budget advocacy for special operations, but much of it will require Congress’ approval." date: "2026-11-13" modified: "2026-11-13" authors: - name: "David Roza" job_title: "Senior Reporter" link: "https://taskandpurpose.com/authors/david-roza.md" url: "https://taskandpurpose.com/news/hegseth-oss-special-operations/" categories: - "News" --- # The Pentagon brings back World War II-era OSS for special operations missions, funding ![Green Beret assigned to 1st Special Forces Group (Airborne), prepare to provide support by fire during Tahoma Strike, at Yakima Training Center, Washington, Oct. 26, 2026.]() *Green Beret assigned to 1st Special Forces Group (Airborne), prepare to provide support by fire during Tahoma Strike, at Yakima Training Center, Washington, Oct. 26, 2026. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Brahim Douglas* The Office of Strategic Services, the intelligence and commando arm of the U.S. military during World War II, might live again, at least in name, as part of a reorganization of the Pentagon’s special operations civilian leadership. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth [issued a memo]() on Nov. 2 that renames the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict to the Assistant Secretary of War for the Office of Strategic Services, though permanently doing so would require congressional approval. As part of the renaming, Hegseth wants to move the assistant secretary of defense for special operations and low-intensity conflict position higher up the leadership ladder, marking the latest in a decades-long effort to put civilian oversight of special operations forces (SOF) on an even footing with the secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. He also wants to expand the assistant secretary’s staff by 75 civilians and 25 service members; and increase funding by $45 million. Hegseth believes the changes will help direct more resources to special operations at a time when commanders say they are [turning down dozens of missions]() every month because they are stretched too thin. “\[R\]esourcing for SOF remains behind current operational and force posture,” Hegseth wrote in the memo, dated Nov. 2 but publicly [released]() on Nov. 12. “It is time for a bold, foundational change.” ## Secret service history The OSS coordinated U.S. intelligence and special operations during World War II: spying on Axis weapons programs; training resistance groups against the Nazis and Japanese troops; and scouting, sabotaging or outright attacking enemy positions ahead of conventional forces. The OSS was so successful that the Central Intelligence Agency, Army Special Forces (better known as Green Berets), and Navy SEALs trace much of their inspiration and early membership to the group. But bureaucratic infighting, [primarily with the Army and the FBI](), led to the OSS being disbanded in 1945. ![New OSS recruits received small arms training at Prince William Forest Park in Virginia.]() *New OSS recruits received small arms training at Prince William Forest Park in Virginia. National Park Service photo.* While the CIA was established in 1947, special operations did not get a house of its own until 1987, when Congress stood up U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) and the office of assistant secretary of defense for special operations and low-intensity conflict (SO/LIC). As a combatant command, SOCOM is in charge of real-world operations, while SO/LIC serves as civilian oversight and advocate for SOCOM in strategic and budget discussions. The problem, [according]() to the Government Accountability Office, was that SO/LIC lacked the resources and staff to provide adequate oversight, and it was separated from the Secretary of Defense by layers of bureaucracy, which hampered its advocacy efforts. “At a time \[after 9/11\] when special operators were deployed around the world and bravely fighting the war on terror on multiple fronts, few Americans questioned the lack of effective civilian control and oversight,” wrote Green Beret veterans Mark Mitchell and Doug Livermore in a [2020 essay]() for War on the Rocks. “Since at least 2003, however, acquisition issues, proposed changes to headquarters structure, and poor communication with Congress have led to many questions about civilian oversight,” they said. ![Green Berets assigned to 1st Special Forces Group (Airborne), kneel while establishing security during Tahoma Strike, at Yakima Training Center, Washington, Oct. 24, 2026.]() *Green Berets assigned to 1st Special Forces Group (Airborne), kneel while establishing security during Tahoma Strike, at Yakima Training Center, Washington, Oct. 24, 2026. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Brahim Douglas* ## Widespread confusion In 2020, then-Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller, a former Green Beret himself, [announced]() SO/LIC would report directly to him, same as the service secretaries, in a bid to “streamline information flow, enhance decision-making, and more adaptively and adeptly support” special operators, he said at the time. Mitchell and Livermore praised the move, but it came just before a change of leadership. Under President Joe Biden’s new administration, then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin [retained]() some of SO/LIC’s new powers, but [reversed]() others. By 2024, the Government Accountability Office reported widespread confusion over what SO/LIC could do. “The Secretariat has at times had limited input into how its hiring, office space, and IT needs are met because of confusion about \[SO/LIC\]’s administrative role, given \[SO/LIC\]s unique position within DOD,” GAO [wrote](), which GAO said limited SO/LIC’s ability to effectively oversee SOCOM. ## The OSS might live again Hegseth’s memo goes further than Miller or Austin did. The [embattled defense secretary]() can move out on some of his proposed changes, such as transferring 100 new staff and $45 million, treating the OSS head on par with the service secretaries, and telling the services to prioritize support for special operations. However, the most significant change requires Congress’ permission: formally moving the SO/LIC a.k.a. OSS position [up a rung]() from an assistant secretary of defense to an under secretary of defense position. That would unlock significant resources and authority for the OSS head, and Hegseth’s memo called for legislative proposals to pitch the idea to Congress. For now, the Office of Strategic Services name change is a secondary title for SO/LIC, the same way the Department of War is a secondary title for the Department of Defense. Making the name change official requires congressional approval. Congress has legislated for stronger civilian oversight of SOCOM in the past. In fact, Miller’s 2020 change was meant to finally fulfill a Congressional requirement that the Pentagon had [slow-rolled for years.]() But whether that support continues under [intense scrutiny of Hegseth]() and a new, Democratic-controlled Congress in 2027 remains to be seen. ## Author David Roza is a senior reporter at Task & Purpose with extensive experience covering aviation, technology, military pay, benefits, health care, child care, culture, and a range of other personnel matters.David previously covered the Air Force and Space Force for Task & Purpose from 2019 to 2023 and for Air & Space Forces Magazine from 2023 to 2025 before returning to Task & Purpose as a scriptwriter for the team's YouTube channel. Share tips and story ideas with David at david.roza@recurrent.io. ## More - [World War II OSS veteran, 100, earns Special Forces tab]() - [Watchdog finds high rate of serious accidents, lack of oversight, in special operations training]() - [World War II Vet And OSS Legend Finally Honored With Nation’s Highest Civilian Medal]() - [The Pentagon is playing its C Team with so many top positions left unfilled]() - [Owen West resigns as assistant defense secretary for special operations]() - [The Pentagon classified the mission statement for Operation Epic Fury]() - [Army special operations cuts not expected to affect Green Berets]() - [Pentagon’s testosterone program builds on ‘operator syndrome’ worries in special operations]()