The U.S. Navy wants to go on the offensive against near-peer threats, focusing on the ability to strike first and fast with new weapons.
Facing a rising China that is expanding what is already one of the largest naval fleets in the world and fielding powerful standoff weaponry, the U.S. Navy must change its strategic thinking, service leaders said Wednesday, Breaking Defense reported.
The Navy has come face-to-face with some of these threats.In September, a Chinese warship challenged the U.S. destroyer USS Decatur in the South China Sea during a routine freedom-of-navigation operation.
After a similar operation in January, Chinese media hyped the deployment of DF-26 ballistic missiles, which are said to possess an anti-ship capability. That capability has never been demonstrated, though the missiles do threaten U.S. bases in the Pacific.
China's Harbin guided-missile destroyer during a week-long China-Russia navy exercise.(Associated Press)
The threat posed by the Chinese military is growing, officials say.
China's People's Liberation Army “is the principal threat to U.S. interests, U.S. citizens and our allies inside the First Island Chain — a term that refers to the islands that run from northern Japan through Taiwan, the Philippines and Indonesia,” Adm. Philip Davidson, head of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, told Congress on Tuesday, according to The National Interest.
“The PLA is quickly increasing its ability to project power and influence beyond the First Island Chain,” Davidson added.
Countering that threat is a hot topic of discussion across the military.
“We've spent a lot of time over the past years playing defense. Waiting for them to come to you, waiting for the missile to come, for the airplane to come,” Rear Adm. Ronald Boxall, the Navy's director of surface warfare, said this week at a naval warfare conference in San Diego.
“The best defense is a good offense,” Boxall added, “and the idea that we will go after the threat — at range — is something that we have to be able to do.”
USS Coronado, an Independence-variant littoral combat ship, launches the first over-the-horizon missile engagement using a Harpoon Block 1C missile(U.S. Navy phhoto)
Boxall's comments reflect earlier statements by the Navy's top officer, as well as the US military's strong interest in developing longer-range weapons.
The U.S. has to consider not only its responses but also how it can act first, Navy chief of operations Adm. John Richardson said this month in Washington, DC.
“I think it would be great if we could get folks … some of these competitors to respond to our first move. There's an advantage every now and then to playing the white side of the board,” Richardson said, noting a need to get “muscular” with China to enforce international laws about operating at sea, according to USNI News.
The Navy is planning to begin arming its warships with the long-range, anti-ship Naval Strike Missile later this year, and U.S. submarines are getting Harpoon anti-ship missiles. The service is working with industry partners on extended-range capabilities.
“We need to go after offensive to prevent us from being in a position where we go broke playing defense when in fact we can significantly improve our own position though an aggressive offensive posture,” Boxall said Wednesday.
With the ranges China's missiles can reach, “we made a decision that we still needed a little more standoff capability,” Rear Adm. Daryl Caudle, commander of Pacific Fleet's submarine force, said Wednesday, according to Breaking Defense, adding that Caudle agreed with his colleagues that the Navy needs to go on offense.
Read more from Business Insider:
- China's been showing off a lot of new powerful weapons, and experts think they're sending a message
- The Chinese military challenged a U.S. destroyer to a South China Sea showdown
- Aircraft carriers 'are the most survivable airfield' and they may soon be even harder to kill, top Navy admiral says
- 'It's going somewhere, hopefully': Top U.S. admiral says the Navy's struggling $500 million railgun project is a lesson in how not to develop weapons
- No, the Pentagon isn't working on killer robots — yet