Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
Rep. Duncan Hunter's wife pleads guilty to stealing campaign funds for personal use
SAN DIEGO — Years of cavalier spending of her husband's political contributions culminated in a guilty plea Thursday for Margaret Hunter, the wife of Republican Congressman Duncan Hunter who was co-indicted last year in a sweeping campaign finance investigation.
During a change-of-plea hearing in the federal courthouse in San Diego, Margaret Hunter formally admitted that she illegally used thousands of dollars in campaign donations for her personal expenses.
Specifically, Margaret Hunter pleaded guilty to a single count of conspiracy. She faces up to five years in federal custody and a $250,000 fine when she is sentenced Sept. 1.
When asked if she understood and agreed with the plea, she said, "Yes, sir."
Both Hunters were named in a 60-count federal indictment in August alleging that together and separately they both relied on more than $250,000 donated to the congressman's reelection fund for personal expenses.
Among other things, the campaign funds paid for family vacations, tequila shots, golf outings, resort stays, fine dining and private school tuition for their children, according to the indictment.
Margaret Hunter, who previously served as the paid treasurer for her husband's campaigns, twice used political donations to pay for airfare to Warsaw, Poland, for her mother, according to the indictment.
She also spent hundreds of dollars of campaign funds on a family visit to the San Diego Natural History Museum and a lunch at The Prado restaurant in Balboa Park, prosecutors said.
Until Thursday, both Hunters denied the allegations and pledged to fight the charges in court.
After Margaret Hunter's plea hearing, Hunter released a statement saying: "I do not have the full details of Margaret's case, but it's obvious that the Department of Justice (DOJ) went after her to get to me for political reasons. As Margaret's case concludes, she should be left alone. I am the congressman, this is my campaign and any further attention on this issue should be directed solely to me."
The statement went on to repeat his prior claims that prosecutors in his case are politically biased against him, that the criminal investigation was politically motivated and that the matter should have been handled by the Federal Election Commission, not the DOJ.
Duncan Hunter finished his statement by saying he would not answer any questions.
His attorney said Wednesday that his wife's guilty plea would have no immediate effect on his client's case.
"At this time, that does not change anything regarding Congressman Hunter," defense attorney Gregory Vega said in a statement before the hearing. "There are still significant motions that need to be litigated."
Duncan Hunter was stripped of all of his committee seats after the August indictment but was reelected to his 50th District seat last fall.
He did not appear at the courthouse Thursday. He is next due to appear in court July 1 to debate various legal motions.
His absence was notable because the Hunters began their criminal defense last summer by appearing in court together to deny all charges. At more recent hearings, the Hunters arrived to court separately and did not sit together in the public galley.
The couple remain legally married and have three children. It was not immediately clear how the couple's marital standing could affect the case against the congressman.
Vega did not respond to questions about spousal privilege. Legal experts said the husband-and-wife relationship of the two defendants could complicate the prosecution
.The federal indictment issued in August came after two-plus years of scrutiny by federal campaign regulators and The San Diego Union-Tribune of Rep. Hunter's campaign spending.
In filing after filing, Hunter disclosed spending that did not appear to satisfy federal campaign rules, including donations being used for video-game purchases, garage door repair, utility bills and more.
The congressman once used campaign funds to pay for a plane ticket to fly his family's pet rabbit across the country.
Duncan Hunter originally said some of the questionable spending was done by mistake, at one point saying his son had selected the wrong credit card when he paid the video-game charges.
Later, he declared that he and his campaign team had vetted every expenditure and identified some payments that may not have qualified as campaign expenses. He repaid the fund more than $12,000.
But that did not quell the investigation—or continuing reports by the Union-Tribune about his specific expenses.
Duncan Hunter dismissed the stories as "fake news" and said the newspaper was out to get him. After federal prosecutors opened their criminal investigation, Hunter declared he was being targeted by "deep state" partisans within the FBI and others in the U.S. Government.
In one televised interview with Fox News, Hunter laid the blame for any campaign filing errors on his wife, who had been paid $3,000 a month to serve as the campaign treasurer.
"Whatever she did, that'll be looked at too," Hunter said on national TV. "But I didn't do it. I didn't spend any money illegally."
©2019 The San Diego Union-Tribune. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
SEE ALSO: Rep. Duncan Hunter Likely Won't Face Charges After Claiming He Took Photos With Enemy Corpses Downrange
WATCH NEXT: The Navy SEAL Accused Of War Crimes In Iraq
Editor's Note: The following story highlights a veteran at Iron Mountain. Committed to including talented members of the military community in its workplace, Iron Mountain is a client of Hirepurpose, a Task & Purpose sister company. Learn more here.
Jackie Melendrez couldn't be prouder of her husband, her sons, and the fact that she works for the trucking company Iron Mountain. This regional router has been a Mountaineer since 2017, and says the support she receives as a military spouse and mother is unparalleled.
Master Sgt. Larry Hawks, a retired engineer sergeant who served with 3rd Special Forces Group, is being awarded the Distinguished Service Cross on Friday for "valorous actions" in Afghanistan in 2005.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A 40-foot-tall (12 meters) cross-shaped war memorial standing on public land in Maryland does not constitute government endorsement of religion, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in a decision that leaves unanswered questions about the boundaries of the U.S. Constitution's separation of church and state.
The justices were divided on many of the legal issues but the vote was 7-2 to overturn a lower court ruling that had declared the so-called Peace Cross in Bladensburg unconstitutional in a legal challenge mounted by the American Humanist Association, a group that advocates for secular governance. The concrete cross was erected in 1925 as a memorial to troops killed in World War One.
The ruling made it clear that a long-standing monument in the shape of a Christian cross on public land was permissible but the justices were divided over whether other types of religious displays and symbols on government property would be allowed. Those issues are likely to come before the court in future cases.
A relative of the man who opened fire outside downtown Dallas' federal building this week warned the FBI in 2016 that he shouldn't be allowed to buy a gun because he was depressed and suicidal, his mother said Thursday.
Brian Clyde's half-brother called the FBI about his concerns, their mother Nubia Brede Solis said. Clyde was in the Army at the time.
On Monday, Clyde opened fire with an AR-15-style rifle at the Earle Cabell Federal Building. He was fatally shot by federal law enforcement. No one else was seriously injured. His family believes Clyde wanted to be killed.