Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
Scrapping The Entire Department Is Not The Solution To VA’s Problems
The U.S. Department of Veterans’ Affairs is an unyielding, unresponsive mess. Recent findings have shown that not only has the unethical and inappropriate culture of VA healthcare employees not improved since passage of legislation aimed to address deficiencies, it has actually continued. When compared to the promises made to provide high-quality and timely care for veterans, this is obviously unacceptable and in need of drastic repair.
Yet ironically, VA health care is still among the best options available for most veterans, offering care ranked comparably in patient satisfaction to the private sector, and for little to no cost to most veterans. According to an American Customer Satisfaction Index for 2013, VA’s health system earned satisfaction indexes of 84 for overall inpatient care and 82 for outpatient care, while the broader U.S. hospital industry received scores of 80 and 83 in the same categories, respectively.
While there is clearly a gap between our expectations of VA health care and the reality of care veterans are currently receiving, the solution is not to get rid of the department altogether, but to improve it. Though some have called for the disbanding of the entire department the transferring of VA responsibilities, and the sale of VA assets — most recently, the editorial board of the Colorado Springs Gazette — such steps would drastically reduce the ability of the federal government to honor its promise to our veterans.
To start, it’s helpful to examine how we got here. From 1930 to 1989, the Veterans Administration was an independent government agency, which was then reorganized into the cabinet-level Department of Veterans Affairs. Much of the justification for that legislation was to elevate the importance of the organization to equal the importance of its mission, and to better establish lines of authority and oversight.
By the 1990s, VA health care was in a period of crisis and undertook substantial reforms to better meet patient need. Much of these reforms will sound very familiar to problems veterans are experiencing today. Over reliance on hospital care and limited service locations forced patients into long wait times and poor outcomes. Through reorganization and effective leadership, VA massively increased the use of primary care and deemphasized hospital care, resulting in enormous improvements in patient outcomes.
Similar reforms are in desperate need today. Both halves of VA — the Veterans Benefit Administration and Veterans Health Administration — have been caught completely unprepared by the massive influx of veterans needing services since the start of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Reports showing overwhelming backlogs of benefits claims and excessive wait times for healthcare appointments undermines the confidence citizens and veterans have in the department.
The solutions advocated by those who want to shutter the department are actually worse problems in disguise, like the Colorado Springs Gazette suggests, “Congress should defund the bureaucracy, close it and transfer veterans services to agencies that function better.” Pushing programs like VA’s Vocational Rehabilitation to the Department of Labor, VA home loans to the Federal Housing Administration, and VA education benefits to the Department of Education would simply make systemic problems harder to identify when spread across multiple agencies.
One of the greatest problems veterans experience in dealing with VA is in understanding the dizzying array of programs and services available. Who would clearly understand that if they want to use their Post-9/11 G.I. Bill then they must apply with the Department of Education, but if they receive a service-connected disability rating, they can change over that program to Vocational Rehabilitation with the Department of Labor? If there are such problems with communication among one cabinet-level agency like VA, why would anyone believe communications will be better when involving multiple agencies?
Rather than spread veterans across multiple agencies to hide the problem, true cultural change is needed at VA through every level of staffing. First, strong leadership is needed to reform the unethical culture surrounding the hiding of wait times and manipulation of data. While this is easier said than done, cultural norms need to shift to more of an acceptance of errors and failure and an all-hands-on-deck approach to fixing problems, rather than a zero-tolerance approach to any excessive wait times. Such pressure only helps to incentivize unethical behavior in hiding mistakes, rather than actually bringing issues to light so veterans can receive faster care. Bringing these issues to light in a constructive way also provides valuable information that can be used to fix the underlying problems, rather than treat the symptoms alone.
Second, that zero-tolerance approach needs to be applied with a heavy hand toward anyone found manipulating data. While the Veterans Choice Act does contain increased flexibility in penalizing employees found falsifying data or involved in misconduct, this needs to be expanded to an on-the-spot termination for ethical violations of any kind.
Third, VA needs to invest heavily in technology to enable more efficient appointment scheduling practices. While VA has focused in large part on more efficient scheduling from its end, veterans still face an unwieldy and inefficient set of options for scheduling or changing appointments. Proposals like Rep. Seth Moulton’s Faster Care for Veterans Act would help VA utilize smartphones apps and easy-to-use websites to quickly schedule and change appointments. This would allow for both faster and easier scheduling and could substantially reduce wait times, as new time slots become available through veterans changing their appointments through these methods.
These commonsense approaches could go a long way in ushering in a new period of reform and enhancement at VA, similar to the enormous improvements made in VA health care in the 1990s. They would also help ensure the survival of one of the most important tools available in our national commitment to keeping our promises to veterans and their loved ones.
Trump: $6.1 billion in DoD money going to border wall wasn’t for anything that seemed ‘too important to me’
President Donald Trump claims the $6.1 billion from the Defense Department's budget that he will now spend on his border wall was not going to be used for anything "important."
Trump announced on Friday that he was declaring a national emergency, allowing him to tap into military funding to help pay for barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border.
Long before Tony Stark took a load of shrapnel to the chest in a distant war zone, science fiction legend Robert Heinlein gave America the most visceral description of powered armor for the warfighter of the future. Forget the spines of extra-lethal weaponry, the heads-up display, and even the augmented strength of an Iron Man suit — the real genius, Heinlein wrote in Starship Troopers, "is that you don't have to control the suit; you just wear it, like your clothes, like skin."
"Any sort of ship you have to learn to pilot; it takes a long time, a new full set of reflexes, a different and artificial way of thinking," explains Johnny Rico. "Spaceships are for acrobats who are also mathematicians. But a suit, you just wear."
First introduced in 2013, U.S. Special Operations Command's Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit (TALOS) purported to offer this capability as America's first stab at militarized powered armor. And while SOCOM initially promised a veritable Iron Man-style tactical armor by 2018, a Navy spokesman told Task & Purpose the much-hyped exoskeleton will likely never get off the launch pad.
"The prototype itself is not currently suitable for operation in a close combat environment," SOCOM spokesman Navy Lt. Phillip Chitty told Task & Purpose, adding that JATF-TALOS has no plans for an external demonstration this year. "There is still no intent to field the TALOS Mk 5 combat suit prototype."
D-Day veteran James McCue died a hero. About 500 strangers made sure of it.
"It's beautiful," Army Sgt. Pete Rooney said of the crowd that gathered in the cold and stood on the snow Thursday during McCue's burial. "I wish it happened for every veteran's funeral."
MUSCAT/KABUL (Reuters) - Even before any peace push-related drawdowns, the U.S. military is expected to trim troop levels in Afghanistan as part of an efficiency drive by the new commander, a U.S. general told Reuters on Friday, estimating the cuts may exceed 1,000 forces.
An Army investigator involved in the case of a Green Beret charged with murder has been suspended from his duties and charged with stolen valor, according to Dan Lamothe at The Washington Post.
Army Sgt. 1st Class Mark Delacruz, who has been a special agent with the Army's Criminal Investigation Command for more than four years, was charged with "unauthorized wear of a Purple Heart, Air Assault Badge, Pathfinder Badge and Combat Action Badge and is accused of submitting a package to an Army promotion board that stated he earned a Purple Heart when he did not," the Post wrote, citing a CID spokesman.