It Seems Inconceivable That We’re Still Fighting In Afghanistan...And Yet Here We Are

DoD photo

Sixteen years. It has now been over 16 years since the United States began military operations in Afghanistan. At the beginning of those operations, as I watched friends deploy to the initial fighting, I would have found the idea that I would deploy there at the beginning of a massive buildup of American troops in 2009, or that we would still be there in 2017, inconceivable. But like Vizzini, the evil mastermind and kidnapper from Princess Bride, I had a lot to learn about the meaning of “inconceivable.”

If repeated deployments to Afghanistan were inconceivable to me, the idea was entirely preposterous to my civilian friends. In 2009, many thought we were already done with Afghanistan, and despite a spike in interest commensurate with the surge of 20102012, by 2015 most had forgotten the war altogether. Rarely mentioned during the presidential campaign of 2016, it seemed like an unwritten political rule to avoid discussing the war altogether.

It is this ongoing lack of interest and engagement in the war that made the actions of Secretary of Defense James Mattis prior to the roll-out of Trump’s August speech on Afghan strategy all the more interesting. Given authority to increase troop numbers earlier this year, Mattis waited to send additional troops until the president approved and announced an overall strategy for the war. It was an admirable move as further commitment of troops in Afghanistan should come with a clearly articulated strategy and ownership of that strategy among our elected leaders. Unfortunately that effort failed.

Trump’s strategy speech, which he gave in August, was notable as both an aggressive endorsement of the status quo and for foisting all responsibility for Afghanistan upon the American military. As Trump made clear, he only reluctantly embraced a renewed commitment to Afghanistan and made none of the hard choices required for an actual long-term plan. Without detailing how these additional troops might do what over a 100,000 could not, Trump relied instead on the idea that so long as the military was “unleashed” then victory was certain.

U.S. Army photo

A machine gun crew with the 82nd Airborne Division’s 2nd Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment, sets up an overwatch position during a foot patrol May 8, 2012.

Beyond reinforcing why we continue to fail in Afghanistan, the plan as laid out by Trump has troubling implications for how Americans engage with the war and our military. We are well beyond the point where most Americans feel any meaningful connection with the armed forces and have only a sense of respectful indifference to the institution and those who serve. This has been on full display with the varying responses of shock and outrage to the tragic deaths of four U.S. troops in Niger from policymakers who didn’t even know we had troops on the ground, although the United States has had a presence there for nearly five years.

More worrisome is the fact that we have entered an era where most Americans are comfortable with expansive use of the military overseas, yet have no inclination of actually serving themselves.

The result is a military increasingly viewed as some kind of magical, mercenary panacea that can solve complex political problems via overwhelming firepower, at no cost or commitment from the rest of the country. At one point, Mattis was a voice against that notion, having stated while in charge of U.S. Central Command that, “If you don’t fully fund the State Department, then I need to buy more ammunition.” Unfortunately, it is clear that the administration has decided on more bullets, and that only lip service is being paid to diplomatic solutions or a “whole of government” approach to the conflict in Afghanistan.

Without the civilian and diplomatic resources deployed across Afghanistan that we had eight years ago, the Afghan government struggles for legitimacy against the Taliban outside of Kabul. This means that future military successes may be for naught as many Afghans continue to see the government as predatory, if not wholly illegitimate. A similar dynamic is taking place at the international level, where for all the talk of taking a new approach and hard line against Pakistan, the administration has yet to appoint an ambassador to manage that troubled relationship.

Instead, we have embraced military solutions to prop up a faltering Afghan state, and our generals appear to be happy with that course of action. Gen. John Nicholson, the top military commander in Afghanistan, apparently got everything he wanted with the new strategy, which appears to hinge on papering over the weakness of the Afghan government with a “tidal wave of airpower.”  

And so we are in Afghanistan for the long(er) haul. We once again await the next decisive fighting season and are settling in for, in Nicholson’s words, at least another five years. Inconceivable that we would still be in Afghanistan in 2017?

Welcome to the idea of still fighting there beyond 2022.

Benjamin Franklin nailed it when he said, "Fatigue is the best pillow." True story, Benny. There's nothing like pushing your body so far past exhaustion that you'd willingly, even longingly, take a nap on a concrete slab.

Take $75 off a Casper Mattress and $150 off a Wave Mattress with code TASKANDPURPOSE

And no one knows that better than military service members and we have the pictures to prove it.

Read More Show Less
Gross. (U.S. Army/Spc. Scott Lindblom)

Hoping to push for clean-up and to hold polluters accountable, members of Congress created a task force Wednesday to help constituents nationwide who have contended with drinking water contaminated by chemicals used on military bases.

Read More Show Less
U.S. Marine Corps recruits with Platoon 4030, Papa Company, 4th Recruit Training Battalion, perform rifle manual marching movements during an initial drill evaluation June 25, 2018, on Parris Island, S.C. (U.S. Marine Corps/Sgt. Dana Beesley)

Editor's Note: This article by Patricia Kime originally appeared on, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

A congressionally mandated commission is weighing whether women should be required to register for the Selective Service System, or whether the U.S. needs a draft registration system at all.

Read More Show Less

Sometimes, even the most well-meaning of tweets can come back to haunt you as a meme.

Read More Show Less
An AH-64D Longbow Apache helicopter lands during a combined arms demonstration as part of South Carolina National Guard Air & Ground Expo 2009 at McEntire Joint National Guard Base, S.C., Oct. 10, 2009. (U.S. Army/Sgt. Roberto Di Giovine)

Welcome to Confessions Of, an occaisional series where Task & Purpose's James Clark solicits hilarious, embarrassing, and revealing stories from troops and vets about their job, billet, or a tour overseas. Are you in an interesting assignment and think you might have something to share? Email with your story.

"Nothing is more powerful than a young boy's wish. Except an Apache helicopter. An Apache helicopter has machine guns and missiles. It is an unbelievably impressive complement of weaponry, an absolute death machine."

While this Patrick Stewart quote may be from an R-rated movie about a talking teddy bear, it's remarkably accurate. After all, the old warhorse has been kicking ass since it was first adopted by the U.S. Army in the 1980s. Designed to get into trouble fast and put it down even faster, the AH-64 Apache usually comes bristling with ordnance, from an M230 chain gun firing 30mm rounds to Hellfire missiles and rockets.

In the words of Tyler Merritt "it's basically a fucking flying tank."

Read More Show Less