Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
Meet the soldier who uses 'Star Wars' and 'Game Of Thrones' to explain modern military conflicts
Matt Cavanaugh was caught in a holding pattern, as it goes for American military personnel leaving a place like South Korea. He had spent most of 2015 and some of 2016 away from his wife and two young daughters, and he had to wait a few more days before finally returning home to Manitou Springs.
"You're just in a crummy hotel room doing nothing," he says.
So the time was perfect to delve into a new project that had come to mind over the past year: a book comparing modern war with "Star Wars."
It was an unlikely idea, especially considering the events that unraveled during his deployment. At a time of artillery exchange, at a time when two South Korean sergeants each had a leg blown off, how could the mind drift to a galaxy far, far away?
But Cavanaugh's mind has always wondered. That is, after all, part of the lieutenant colonel's job at North American Aerospace Defense Command, the underground outpost of Cheyenne Mountain.
"At NORAD, we're often contemplating things that have not come to pass. In a lot of ways, we're dreaming up fictions and then figuring out how to counter them before they ever become real," Cavanaugh says. "Which is not all that dissimilar from the script of a film or the words in a fiction novel."
And Cavanaugh always has found time for side projects, whether historical research, an op-ed or essay. At West Point, he started a think tank, the Modern War Institute, alongside John Spencer.
"He reminds me of one of these McChrystals," Spencer says, referring to retired four-star Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who commanded U.S. forces in Afghanistan and is known for his regimented lifestyle.
"They run like 10 miles a day, read this, write that. ... It's like he doesn't sleep. He's just constantly learning about himself and continually producing."
During one early morning run in Korea, Cavanaugh was listening to a podcast with Randall Munroe. The cartoonist and physicist explained his attempt to get kids interested in the sciences with the help of Yoda: Using gravitational constants provided by Wookieepedia, Munroe's class concluded the level of force required to pull Luke Skywalker's spaceship from the muddy waters of Dagobah.
And then it clicked for Cavanaugh. As an Army strategist insistent upon explaining warfare to civilian society — like a mathematician before a bored classroom — "Star Wars" could help. It made sense right there in Korea, where foreign counterparts weren't all that familiar with wars abroad, historic and present.
"But they all knew about the rebels and the Empire," Cavanaugh says.
That's the same for people across generations back home, he figured. "Star Wars really is the universal war. ... That's what makes it so useful and powerful to use as a device to have a conversation about real issues."
The cover of 'Strategy Strikes Back: How Star Wars Explains Modern Military Conflict'
So there in the crummy hotel room, Cavanaugh streamed all seven episodes, taking meticulous notes, pondering connections.
Later came Strategy Strikes Back: How Star Wars Explains Modern Military Conflict, a collection of essays into its second printing. McChrystal provides the forward, followed by several more ruminations by military and intelligence officials.
And coming this spring, the next in the anthology: Winning Westeros: How Game of Thrones Explains Modern Military Conflict. The book is set for release after the HBO show's highly anticipated series finale, beginning in April.
Contributors this time include retired Admiral and NATO Supreme Allied Commander James Stavridis. For his part, Cavanaugh draws on the Night's Watch, who from their wall send warning of a destructive army marching on.
"Nearly nobody listened," he writes, asserting that's to do with the socio barrier between the soldiers and the rest of the realm. The wall could represent the same invisible divide in America, Cavanaugh proposes.
"Here, instead of a 'Wall,' though, when we describe the distance between civilians and soldiers, academics prefer a term like 'the gap,'" he writes.
A promotional image for 'Winning Westeros'(Modern War Institute/Eventbrite)
Back to edit "Winning Westeros" is Max Brooks, whose hit zombie book, "World War Z," landed him surprising spots at military conferences and study groups. Cavanaugh admired his thinking and asked him aboard "Strategy Strikes Back."
Brooks called himself "a tourist in this world" while talking about the book last summer at the Commonwealth Club, the prestigious public affairs forum. He referenced a chapter by a former senior military strategist, who argues that the Jedi became too elite, insulating themselves from the republic.
"And so when a big crisis came, the republic didn't know what to do," Brooks said. "The Jedi simply didn't have the numbers, and they didn't have the public outreach, and that's happening today."
John Amble is another editor on the project. He's the editorial director at the Modern War Institute who, like Cavanaugh, deployed to the Middle East in the war's early years.
Bridging "the gap" is one intent of the books. But there's a personal aspect, too.
"I think especially for people who have been operationally active over the past couple of decades, it's been tough. It's been tough because we don't really know what victory looks like," Amble says.
"So using science fiction or a blockbuster television series, I think we're kind of just searching for any tool to better understand these conflicts that, frankly, we've struggled to understand even when we've been in the midst of them."
Out of high school in Minnesota, Cavanaugh wanted to go to a liberal arts college in a little town that had a welcome sign reading: "Cows, Colleges and Contentment."
But West Point offered him a hockey scholarship, so off he went to New York.
"It was a horrible four years, it really was," he says. "It's not a pleasant place to go to school. But it was meaningful. It opened doors to me that I really enjoyed passing through."
He pauses for a moment. "Some of them were frankly horrible."
On Sept. 11, 2001, he could see the smoke from campus. He knew his fate was sealed before graduation the following summer, reinforced only by the words George W. Bush spoke at the ceremony. "... History has also issued its call to your generation … Our war on terror is only begun …"
Cavanaugh was deployed to Iraq the next year, in 2003, his unit arriving right after the invasion. "Which seemed fortunate at the time," he says.
But they were stationed west of Baghdad, where the fighting raged. He lost classmates, commanders, subordinates. He lost more on his next deployment in 2005, just months after the first.
"I can see their faces right now," Cavanaugh says, driving home one recent day from NORAD. "It's the question that never gets answered, or the gap that never gets filled. Why them? Why were we there doing this?"
Back home in 2007, he started down another path, the one he thought he'd take before West Point: He went to law school. But within a year, he felt out of place and left.
And so he returned to his path of understanding. The Army sent him to New Zealand to pursue his masters in strategic studies. Just last year, he achieved another degree.
"My Ph.D was on supreme military command. It was on war," he says. "So, personally and professionally, my curiosity is how war almost has no end. Because, see, my most jarring experiences in life happened in 2003 and 2005. Those first few years in Iraq when I was 24 and 26. It's almost as if it was so disorienting that 10, 15 years later, I'm still trying to understand what the heck that was all about."
That's what explains the research, he says. That's what explains the Modern War Institute. That's what explains all the writing, all the op-eds and essays. That's what explains the books. "Any path to understanding the better," Cavanaugh says. "That's what I'm drawn to. Like a moth to the light."
What he's learned is that suffering continues.
The war in the Middle East goes on. Innocent Syrians are dying. Nuclear threats persist. This "is an age when deadly technologies become less expensive and more destructive — insanely cheap and ridiculously powerful," Cavanaugh writes in "Winning Westeros."
Does "Game of Thrones" offer any hope? he shrugs. Hard to say.
But like everyone else, he'll watch the last season and root for a happy ending. A lot of bad things have happened, and it seems they'll continue.
But Cavanaugh has hope. As he writes at the end of his chapter: "The good guys usually do win in the end ..."
©2019 The Gazette (Colorado Springs, Colo.). Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
WATCH NEXT: Deadpool Is The Worst Special Forces Soldier Ever
A memo circulating over the weekend warning of a "possible imminent attack" against U.S. soldiers in Germany was investigated by Army officials, who found there to not be a serious threat after all.
The U.S. Navy will name its fourth Ford-class aircraft carrier after Doris Miller, an iconic World War II sailor recognized for his heroism during the Pearl Harbor attack, according to reports in The Honolulu Star-Advertiser and U.S. Naval Institute News.
Acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly is expected to announce the naming of CVN-81 during a ceremony on Monday in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, according to USNI. Two of Miller's nieces are expected to be there, according to the Star-Advertiser.
Comedian Jon Stewart has joined forces with veterans groups to make sure service members who have been sickened by toxins from burn pits get the medical care they need, according to the Military Officers Association of America.
"Quite frankly, this is not just about burn pits — it's about the way we go to war as a country," Stewart said during his Jan. 17 visit to Washington, D.C. "We always have money to make war. We need to always have money to take care of what happens to people who are selfless enough, patriotic enough, to wage those wars on our behalf."
Editor's Note: The following is an op-ed. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Task & Purpose.
Editor's Note: A version of this article originally appeared on the blog of Angry Staff Officer
This morning, the Virginia state capitol in Richmond saw dozens of armed men gathering to demonstrate their support for the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution – the right to bear arms. These men were not merely bearing arms, however; they were fully accoutered in the trappings of what one would call a paramilitary group: helmets, vests, ammunition pouches, camouflage clothing, and other "tactical" necessities, the majority of which are neither tactical nor necessary. Their weapons, too, are bedecked with all sorts of accessories, and are also in the paramilitary lane. Rather than carry rifles or shotguns that one would use for hunting, they instead carry semi-automatic "military grade" weapons, to merely prove that they can.
This is not an uncommon sight in America. Nor has it ever been. Armed groups of angry men have a long and uncomfortable history in the United States. On very rare occasions, these irregulars have done some good against corrupt, power-hungry, and abusive county governments. For the most part, however, they bode no good.
How We Found Out explores recent reporting from Task & Purpose, answering questions about how we sourced our stories, what challenges we faced, and offers a behind-the-scenes look at how we cover issues impacting the military and veterans community.
Following a string of news reports on private Facebook group called Marines United, where current and former Marines shared nude photos of their fellow service members, the Corps launched an internal investigation to determine if the incident was indicative of a larger problem facing the military's smallest branch.
In December 2019, Task & Purpose published a feature story written by our editor in chief, Paul Szoldra, which drew from the internal review. In the article, Szoldra detailed the findings of that investigation, which included first-hand accounts from male and female Marines.
Task & Purpose spoke with Szoldra to discuss how he got his hands on the investigation, how he made sense of the more than 100 pages of anecdotes and personal testimony, and asked what, if anything, the Marine Corps may do to correct the problem.
This is the fourth installment in the recurring column How We Found Out.