As The Taliban Retakes Sangin In Afghanistan, Veterans Remember Its Dark Legacy

news
U.S. Marines with Company I, 3rd Battalion, 5th Marines provide security while Marines search a compound during a patrol in Sangin Valley, Afghanistan Nov. 24, 2010.
U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. David Hernandez

A resurgent Taliban force has taken control of Sangin in Afghanistan's Helmand Province, bringing denials from the country's fledgling government and bad memories for Marines who fought and bled to make the district safe.


News of Sangin's fall came came March 23, local and military officials confirmed to The New York Times, even as the central government in Kabul denied reports of the Taliban's success. Afghan troops pulled back from Sangin’s main garrison after insurgent fighters surrounded and captured the city overnight, the BBC reported.

Home to swaths of farmland and buttressed by slowly rising light brown mountains, Sangin is beautiful, but its reputation is ugly. The district claimed the lives of more American Marines and British service members than any of the country’s 400 other districts during the war, according to The New York Times. Since the U.S.-led coalition handed control of Sangin to Afghanistan’s military in 2013, hundreds of Afghan soldiers and police officers have also been killed defending the district.

Related: I Deployed Twice To Helmand, I Can’t Believe Marines Are Going Back »

For veterans of the 1st Battalion, 6th Marines — one of many Marine units that would rotate through Sangin during the war — the news dredged up a range of emotions. Sangin’s fall to the Taliban brought a mix of frustration, disdain, and sadness to the Americans who walked its dusty, dangerous roads.

“I fought in Fallujah and I fought in Ramadi as well, and it’s the same kind of low blow. Out of the three, [Sangin] was by far my bloodiest,” said Chris Cravens, who served as a Marine platoon sergeant with Bravo Company, 1/6, during their deployment to the district. “Every step down was a minefield. It wasn’t just bullets and mortars. You’ve got guys literally fighting for every inch of turf.”

But for a few, the loss of Sangin seemed like a forgone conclusion.

“It doesn’t surprise me,” Brandon Baia, a former Marine infantryman with Bravo Company, 1/6 told Task & Purpose. The reason, he said, was the attitude of the Afghan security forces he’d worked with in Sangin: “Their ‘give a shit level’ wasn’t very high. It seemed like they were there for a paycheck, and not to actually fight for their own country.

“We spent God knows how much money training these people and providing them with weapons,” Baia said, “and through two tours encountering [Afghan security forces], I encountered about five guys who were there to fight, wanted to fight, and cared about their country the way we do when we go and fight for it.”

Baia spent the early part of his deployment patrolling out of Forward Operating Base Nolay in Sangin. His first days there were marked by sporadic firefights and abrupt ambushes, then the Taliban moved to employing IEDs.

The IED pressure plates there, and in much of Helmand, were crafted out of wood and initiated with carbon rods from car batteries to evade the Marines’ metal detectors. Insurgents would bury a bundle or jug of homemade explosives nearby and wait for one unlucky step. “When you get to Sangin, everything is foot paths and you’re walking across open fields,” Baia said. “The IED threat was there. That was pretty much the only thing we had to worry about: Am I going to lose a couple legs or not?”

Sangin’s military value, then and now, lies in its location. A hub for the opium trade — a principal source of funding for the Taliban — the district is situated between the Helmand River valley and Kandahar Province, which means whoever controls it can easily travel between two key provinces. That’s why the U.S. deployed units to the district constantly, and why it continued to be a battleground after the American military withdrew in 2014.

In 2009, the district was under the purview of the British Royal Marines, who suffered 106 deaths there — accounting for nearly a quarter of all combat fatalities in Afghanistan that year. When U.S. Marines deployed to replace them, 20 were killed in the first three months, according to The New York Times; another 200 were wounded. The 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment deployed to Sangin in 2010 and suffered the heaviest losses of any battalion in the war.

Marines and sailors from 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment, Regimental Combat Team 2, in Sangin, paused at Forward Operating Base Nolay, Dec. 28, 2010, to honor Cpl. Derek A. Wyatt, a team leader for 1st Platoon, Lima Company, Lance Cpl. Kenneth A. Corzine, a rifleman in 1st Squad, 3rd Platoon, Lima Company and Lance Cpl. Colton Rusk, a machine gunner with Weapons Company. All three Marines were killed in action while deployed with 3/5 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.U.S. Marine Corps photo

In recent months, Gen. John W. Nicholson, commander in Afghanistan and prominent lawmakers on Capitol Hill have said the U.S. needs to send more troops back to Afghanistan to end the stalemate there. The Marine Corps is already deploying 300 service members to support the fight in Helmand.

But despite what they already gave in Sangin, some vets are skeptical that more U.S. action in the district will help its residents. “I can’t say I’m super depressed about” Sangin’s fall, Miles Lagoze, a former Marine videographer and Purple Heart recipient who served in Sangin while attached to 1/6, told Task & Purpose. “When we were there people were suffering a lot more, because bombs were being dropped and everything.

“The people there, they depend on the Taliban for a lot of things, because the government doesn’t do jackshit for them,” he added. “People will say ‘oh Afghanistan’s going to shit now that we left,’ but when we were there it was shit, because there was a war going on.

“If the war ends,” Lagoze added, “maybe it’ll be more peaceful.”

CORRECTION: This article previously stated that 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment deployed to Sangin in 2011. The battalion deployed there in 2010. (Updated 3/27/2017; 10:40 am EST)

Arizona Army National Guard soldiers with the 160th and 159th Financial Management Support Detachments qualify with the M249 squad automatic weapon at the Florence Military Reservation firing range on March 8, 2019. (U.S. Army/Spc. Laura Bauer)

The recruiting commercials for the Army Reserve proclaim "one weekend each month," but the real-life Army Reserve might as well say "hold my beer."

That's because the weekend "recruiting hook" — as it's called in a leaked document compiled by Army personnel for the new chief of staff — reveal that it's, well, kinda bullshit.

When they're not activated or deployed, most reservists and guardsmen spend one weekend a month on duty and two weeks a year training, according to the Army recruiting website. But that claim doesn't seem to square with reality.

"The Army Reserve is cashing in on uncompensated sacrifices of its Soldiers on a scale that must be in the tens of millions of dollars, and that is a violation of trust, stewardship, and the Army Values," one Army Reserve lieutenant colonel, who also complained that his battalion commander "demanded" that he be available at all times, told members of an Army Transition Team earlier this year.

Read More Show Less

According to an internal Army document, soldiers feel that the service's overwhelming focus on readiness is wearing down the force, and leading some unit leaders to fudge the truth on their unit's readiness.

"Soldiers in all three Army Components assess themselves and their unit as less ready to perform their wartime mission, despite an increased focus on readiness," reads the document, which was put together by the Army Transition Team for new Chief of Staff Gen. James McConville and obtained by Task & Purpose. "The drive to attain the highest levels of readiness has led some unit leaders to inaccurately report readiness."

Lt. Gen. Eric J. Wesley, who served as the director of the transition team, said in the document's opening that though the surveys conducted are not scientific, the feedback "is honest and emblematic of the force as a whole taken from seven installations and over 400 respondents."

Those surveyed were asked to weigh in on four questions — one of which being what the Army isn't doing right. One of the themes that emerged from the answers is that "[r]eadiness demands are breaking the force."

Read More Show Less

If you've paid even the slightest bit of attention in the last few years, you know that the Pentagon has been zeroing in on the threat that China and Russia pose, and the future battles it anticipates.

The Army has followed suit, pushing to modernize its force to be ready for whatever comes its way. As part of its modernization, the Army adopted the Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) concept, which serves as the Army's main war-fighting doctrine and lays the groundwork for how the force will fight near-peer threats like Russia and China across land, air, sea, cyber, and space.

But in an internal document obtained by Task & Purpose, the Army Transition Team for the new Chief of Staff, Gen. James McConville, argues that China poses a more immediate threat than Russia, so the Army needs make the Asia-Pacific region its priority while deploying "minimal current conventional forces" in Europe to deter Russia.

Read More Show Less

As the saying goes, you recruit the soldier, but you retain the family.

And according to internal documents obtained by Task & Purpose, the Army still has substantial work to do in addressing families' concerns.

Read More Show Less
The Marine Corps Exchange at Quantico (Photo: Valerie OBerry)

If you're a veteran with a VA service-connected disability rating, a former prisoner of war, or a Purple Heart recipient, the exchange, recreation facilities, and commissary on base will be opening their doors to you starting in 2020.

In what's being billed as the largest expansion of new shoppers in the military commissary system in 65 years, veterans will be allowed back into many of the same retail outlets they had access to while in uniform starting on Jan. 1, 2020, thanks to a measure put in to the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act.

Read More Show Less