The Danger Assuming Every Veteran Who Does Something Crazy Has PTSD

Photo by Master Sgt. Kevin Milliken

Major news organizations have a long history of tying acts of violence to military service and post-traumatic stress disorder regardless of their relevance to the events that unfold. In 1995, after Timothy McVeigh bombed a federal building in Oklahoma City, reports about his service and potential stress as a result of his involvement in the Iraq War filled the headlines. After the Fort Hood shootings that took place in 2009, the media linked the story to the dangers of combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder, although Nidal Hasan had never deployed. And after the 2014 Fort Hood shootings, media coverage focused on Ivan Lopez’s “mental Issues” and the fact that he had been assessed for, however not diagnosed with the disorder, even though Lopez never saw combat during his four-month deployment to Iraq. Just days after the 2014 Fort Hood shooting, known criminal, racist, and suspected murderer Frazier Glenn Miller (who also goes by the last name Cross) shot three people outside Kansas City, Missouri. Again, reports were quick to paint a picture of veterans as being on the verge of extremism.

There’s danger in using combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder to frame these events in that it stigmatizes the condition and perpetuates the stereotype associating veterans with violent acts. This can deter veterans who are currently suffering from the effects of post-traumatic stress from seeking treatment for their condition, out of fear that they may be unfairly misjudged. Dakota Meyer, a recent Medal of Honor recipient, after the recent Fort Hood shooting, stressed the need to differentiate between post-traumatic stress sufferers and mass shooters saying, “Going out and shooting your own friends, your own people, that’s not PTSD … I don’t know what the word for it is. It’s close to psychotic.” The implication that those coming home wounded after serving overseas are inherently dangerous does a disservice to them and undermines their potential for successful recovery.

Anyone who is familiar with the research would be quick to point out that the stereotype is far from reality. It’s as arbitrary as holding the entire Muslim community, two billion strong, responsible for the extremist jihadists responsible for unspeakable violence in the Middle East. Or allowing the Westboro Baptist church to represent Christians everywhere. Extremists exist in every organization and to allow them to represent the majority is ignorant and dangerous. According to the Department of Veterans Affairs, only 11-20% of veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are thought to experience PTSD and most people with PTSD never engage in violence. The stereotype of the unhinged veteran is trite and untrue. While there are those who do suffer and deserve timely and effective treatment, they are a fraction of the aggregate.

The reality is that Omar Gonzalez, the man who jumped the White House fence and burst through the front door last month, is an Army combat veteran who was injured and retired from service. He is recalled as a good guy suffering from mental illness and in need of treatment. While he served three tours of duty in Iraq and was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress, the circumstances of his case and behavior remain vague. As Dan Lamothe wrote for the Washington Post, until we know more, "it may be best to reserve judgment.”

When we read the headlines, let’s keep in mind that the actual story here is the security vulnerabilities of the White House. Gonzalez is indeed part of the veteran community, but that in itself is not indicative of all veteran behavior, or those struggling with post-traumatic stress disorder. There are nearly 22 million veterans and 2.1 million active-duty and reserve service members currently around the nation. Being a veteran has 22 million faces and unique stories. There is always an impulse to hypothesize in an effort to explain these events. In doing so, journalists must focus on the individual and have a responsibility to not generalize or sensationalize. Unless of course, equal attention is given to the majority of veterans who are doing amazing things around the world.

Islamic state members walk in the last besieged neighborhood in the village of Baghouz, Deir Al Zor province, Syria February 18, 2019. (Reuters/Rodi Said)

NEAR BAGHOUZ, Syria (Reuters) - The Islamic State appeared closer to defeat in its last enclave in eastern Syria on Wednesday, as a civilian convoy left the besieged area where U.S.-backed forces estimate a few hundred jihadists are still holed up.

Read More Show Less
U.S. Air Force Airmen assigned to the 317th Airlift Wing walk to waiting family members and friends after stepping off of a C-130J Super Hercules at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, Sept. 17, 2018 (U.S. Air Force/Airman 1st Class Mercedes Porter)

Editor's Note: This article by Gina Harkins originally appeared on, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

The U.S. Air Force has issued new guidelines for active-duty, reserve and National Guard airmen who are considered non-deployable, and officials will immediately begin flagging those who have been unable to deploy for 12 consecutive months for separation consideration.

Read More Show Less
Pictured left to right: Pedro Pascal ("Catfish"), Garrett Hedlund ("Ben"), Charlie Hunnam ("Ironhead"), and Ben Affleck ("Redfly") Photo Courtesy of Netflix

A new trailer for Netflix's Triple Frontier dropped last week, and it looks like a gritty mash-up of post-9/11 war dramas Zero Dark Thirty and Hurt Locker and crime thrillers Narcos and The Town.

Read More Show Less
Army Sgt. Daniel Cowart gets a hug from then-Dallas Cowboys defensive end Chris Canty. Photo: Department of Defense

The Distinguished Service Cross was made for guys like Sgt. Daniel Cowart, who literally tackled and " hand to hand combat" a man wearing a suicide vest while he was on patrol in Iraq.

So it's no wonder he's having his Silver Star upgraded to the second-highest military award.

Read More Show Less
A small unmanned aerial vehicle built by service academy cadets is shown here flying above ground. This type of small UAV was used by cadets and midshipmen from the U.S. Air Force Academy, the U.S. Military Academy and the U.S. Naval Academy, during a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency-sponsored competition at Camp Roberts, California, April 23-25, 2017. During the competition, cadets and midshipmen controlled small UAVs in "swarm" formations to guard territory on the ground at Camp Roberts. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Drones have been used in conflicts across the globe and will play an even more important role in the future of warfare. But, the future of drones in combat will be different than what we have seen before.

The U.S. military can set itself apart from others by embracing autonomous drone warfare through swarming — attacking an enemy from multiple directions through dispersed and pulsing attacks. There is already work being done in this area: The U.S. military tested its own drone swarm in 2017, and the UK announced this week it would fund research into drone swarms that could potentially overwhelm enemy air defenses.

I propose we look to the amoeba, a single-celled organism, as a model for autonomous drones in swarm warfare. If we were to use the amoeba as this model, then we could mimic how the organism propels itself by changing the structure of its body with the purpose of swarming and destroying an enemy.

Read More Show Less