The DoD Plans On Forcing Out Injured And Wounded Troops Who Are Unable To Deploy

Health & Fitness
Defense Secretary James N. Mattis on a visit to Jakarta, Indonesia on Jan. 23, 2018.
Defense Department / Army Sgt. Amber I. Smith.

The Department of Defense plans on booting sick, injured, and wounded troops out of the military in an effort to become more deployable.

Under a new Pentagon policy, service members who are classified as “non-deployable” for medical and administrative reasons for more than 12 consecutive months will be processed for administrative separation. The military services can grant waivers to non-deployable troops who are still needed.

On any given day, up to 14% of the entire military is non-deployable, which translates to roughly 286,000 service members, Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Robert Wilkie recently told lawmakers.

“If Mr. [Jeff] Bezos in Amazon walked into Christmas week and 14 percent of his work force could not perform their duties, then he would no longer be the largest company in the world,” Wilkie told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Feb. 14.

The new policy isn’t meant to weed out unfit service members, but to encourage non-deployable troops to see medical professionals and therapists so they can become deployable as soon as possible. Defense officials told Task & Purpose that about one-third of non-deployable troops need to see their doctors or dentists immediately to become deployable, while another third have temporary profiles that limit full duty for conditions such as sprained ankles.  

The process is more intensive than a simple doctor’s visit. Troops who are not deployable for more than a year will go through the medical review board process currently in place, said Air Force Maj. Carla Gleason, a Pentagon spokeswoman. The Defense Department is committed to making sure the process is even-handed, balancing the needs of the service members and the Defense Department, she said.

“Going to a medical board is now and will continue to be part of the process for service members who are determined to be non-deployable,” Gleason told Task & Purpose. “If a medical board determines that a service member is not fit for duty, then it is up to the service secretary to grant a waiver to retain the service member or transition them to civilian life.”

The service branches have until October 2018 to begin mandatory processing for administrative or disability separation for non-deployable service members, but they can begin the process now, the policy says. The services can also begin separating service members as soon as they are determined to be non-deployable for more than a year.

“We have to ensure that given the climate that this country faces, that everyone who signs up can be deployed to any corner of the world at any given time,” Wilkie told Congress.

There are a few several exceptions to the new policy: It does not apply to women who are pregnant or dealing with post-partum conditions, Wilkie told Congress, while medical boards will review the medical status of wounded warriors. Wilkie’s used the example of his own father, severely wounded during the invasion of Cambodia in 1970 authorized by a medical board to stay in the Army while he recovered, he said.

“We respect the contributions of all of our service members, in particular our wounded warriors,” Willkie told Task & Purpose in an email. “We owe them a fair process, and this policy allows for that.”

Military Times first reported on Feb. 5 that the Defense Department would seek to reduce the number of non-deployable troops after Defense Secretary James Mattis ordered review of the matter “to verify our military personnel policies also support and enhance warfighting readiness and force lethality,” as he wrote in a July 21 memo.

When asked if the policy provides an incentive for commanders to separate sick and injured troops, Wilkie said it does “just the opposite.”

“It provides commanders and service members the opportunity to address and resolve these issues quickly – in many cases returning a service member to a deployable status,” Wilkie told Task & Purpose. “The goal is to take care of our people and make the most of our investments while providing a ready and lethal force to defend the nation.”


Want to read more from Task & Purpose? Sign up for our daily newsletter »

REUTERS/Scott Audette/File Photo

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), has long been seen as an apologist for Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, whom she met during a secret trip to Damascus in January 2017.

Most recently, a video was posted on Twitter shows Gabbard evading a question about whether Assad is a war criminal.

Since Gabbard is the only actively serving member of the military who is running for president — she is a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard — Task & Purpose sought to clarify whether she believes Assad has used chlorine gas and chemical weapons to kill his own people.

Read More
Barrett's bolt-action Multi-Role Adaptive Design (MRAD) system (Courtesy photo)

The Army is almost doubling its purchase of new bolt-action Precision Sniper Rifles as its primary anti-personnel sniper system of choice, according to budget documents.

Read More
An A-10C Thunderbolt II aircraft with the 122nd Fighter Wing, Fort Wayne, Indiana, sits on the flight line during Southern Strike, Feb. 11, 2020, at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida. (U.S. Air National Guard/Staff Sergeant Rita Jimenez)

What's cooler than a single missile? How about a missile with a high-powered machine gun attached?

That's exactly what the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is working on, according to budget documents — and it wants $13 million to make it a reality.

Read More
(U.S. Air Force photo)

Air Force officials are investigating the death of a man near the north gate of the U.S. Air Force Academy on Saturday night after the NHL Stadium Series hockey game between the Avalanche and the Los Angeles Kings, military officials said Sunday.

Read More
(Navy photo / Chief Mass Communication Specialist Paul Seeber)

The Citizens of Ebey's Reserve (COER) is asking a federal judge to require the Navy to roll back the number of EA-18G Growler practice flights at Outlying Field Coupeville to pre-2019 levels until a lawsuit over the number of Growler flights is settled.

COER and private citizen Paula Spina filed a motion for a preliminary injunction Thursday.

According to the motion, since March 2019 the Navy has increased the number of Growlers at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island and shifted most of its Growler operations to Outlying Field Coupeville, which is near the Reserve and the town of Coupeville.

"The result is a nearly fourfold increase in Growler flights in that area. Now the overflights subject residents in and near Coupeville to extreme noise for several hours of the day, day and night, many days of the week," said the court document.

Read More