The VA may be forced to pay billions in veterans' ER bills after court ruling

Veterans Benefits
(DoD photo)

Editor's Note: This article by Patricia Kime originally appeared on Military.com, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

A federal court has ruled that the Department of Veterans Affairs wrongly denied reimbursements to veterans who received emergency medical care at non-VA facilities, a decision that could result in payouts to veterans totaling billions.


U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims judges wrote Monday that VA's reimbursement regulations, which were instituted in 2018, violated a law that requires VA to approve veterans' claims for emergency room expenses not covered by private insurance.

The case, Wolfe v. Wilkie, marked the second time VA has been overruled on its interpretation of its reimbursement policies. In 2015, the court ruled that a previous version of the VA regulation on emergency claims violated a 2010 law.

According to the appeals court judges, the 2015 ruling was intended to require VA to act as a secondary payer for expenses not covered by an individual's primary private health insurance.

But VA has not been doing that, they said in the Wolfe v. Wilkie decision.

"VA was ... informing veterans that they were not entitled to reimbursement for non-VA emergency medical care if they had any insurance covering the service at issue," wrote the judges. "In other words, the agency was telling veterans that the law was exactly opposite to what a federal court had held the law to be."

According to VA, the department can pay for emergency medical care if the condition is service-related or caused by a service-related condition and services aren't available at a VA facility.

For conditions not considered service-connected, VA can also pay for emergency medical care, but only under certain conditions: care must be provided in a hospital emergency department; care must be given to treat life or health-threatening conditions; the required care must not be available to the veteran at a VA; the veteran must have received care at a VA facility within the past two years.

By law, VA cannot provide coverage for copayments, coinsurance or deductibles, according to its own fact sheet on emergency medical care.

It was for those reasons that VA denied reimbursement to Coast Guard veteran Amanda Wolfe, who experienced appendicitis in September 2016 and sought care at a civilian hospital, since the VA facility was more than three hours away.

She filed a claim for $2,558.54 of the $22,348.25 bill -- the amount not covered by her employer-sponsored health insurance.

She paid the bill in fall 2016 as it went to collections. And in February 2018, VA denied the claim, saying the $2,558.54 was for copayments, deductibles and coinsurance.

Similarly, another plaintiff in the case, Navy veteran Peter Boerschinger, went to a non-VA emergency room with pneumonia and congestive heart failure. While he was hospitalized, physicians made several attempts to transfer him to a VA facility, but no beds were available.

He submitted a claim for $1,340 that was not covered by his health insurance and was denied.

Two of the three judges on the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims said VA's interpretation of the law was incorrect, and they ordered VA to reimburse veterans for all past and future out-of-pocket emergency medical bills not covered by private insurance, other than copayments.

"It's difficult to conceive how an agency could believe that adopting a regulation that mimics the result a federal court held to be unlawful is somehow appropriate when the statute at issue has not changed," the judges wrote.

The National Veterans Legal Services Program and Sidley Austin LLP represented the plaintiffs in the case, which the judges ruled a class action, meaning any affected veteran must be reimbursed.

According to NVLSP, the decision could cost the VA between $1.8 billion and $6.5 billion in reimbursements for claims filed from 2016 through 2025.

"The court's decision rights a terrible injustice and its order ensures that veterans who were unjustly denied reimbursement for critical emergency treatment at non-VA facilities will finally be reimbursed," NVLSP Executive Director Bart Stichman said in a statement.

The VA has been aware of its claims reimbursement problems since at least 2017, when then-Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minnesota, asked the VA to investigate an allegation that the department was more interested in processing claims quickly rather than accurately.

The VA's Office of Inspector General released a report in August confirming Walz's suspicions, finding the VA had improperly processed 31 percent of claims filed by veterans for non-VA emergency services and the amount of incorrect claims denied April 1 through Sept. 30, 2017 -- estimated at $53.3 million -- represented "potential undue financial risk" for roughly 17,400 veterans.

"The audit found that the [VA's] Claims Adjudication and Reimbursement Directorate placed more emphasis on the number of claims processed than the accuracy of the claims decisions," the VA OIG wrote.

VA spokeswoman Susan Carter said the department is aware of the decision "and reviewing it."

In the Wolfe v. Wilkie decision, Judge Joseph Falvey dissented from the majority on procedural issues, writing that he disagreed with his colleagues because Wolfe's case remains under appeal with the VA, and did not believe the appellate court should weigh in while she is exhausting the claims process.

"[Wolfe] doesn't want us to remove an obstacle. Instead, she wants to skip the appeals process entirely and bring her regulatory challenge directly to the court," Falvey wrote.

This article originally appeared on Military.com

More articles from Military.com:

Soldiers from the 1-118th Field Artillery Regiment of the 48th Infantry Brigade Combat Team fire an M777 Howitzer during a fire mission in Southern Afghanistan, June 10th, 2019. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Jordan Trent)

Once again, the United States and the Taliban are apparently close to striking a peace deal. Such a peace agreement has been rumored to be in the works longer than the latest "Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure" sequel. (The difference is Keanu Reeves has fewer f**ks to give than U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad.)

Both sides appeared to be close to reaching an agreement in September until the Taliban took credit for an attack that killed Army Sgt. 1st Class Elis A. Barreto Ortiz, of the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division. That prompted President Donald Trump to angrily cancel a planned summit with the Taliban that had been scheduled to take place at Camp David, Maryland, on Sept. 8.

Now Taliban spokesman Suhail Shaheen has told a Pakistani newspaper that he is "optimistic" that the Taliban could reach an agreement with U.S. negotiators by the end of January.

Read More
Audie Murphy (U.S. Army photo)

Editor's note: a version of this post first appeared in 2018

On January 26, 1945, the most decorated U.S. service member of World War II earned his legacy in a fiery fashion.

Read More
A Purple Heart (DoD photo)

Florida's two senators are pushing the Defense Department to award Purple Hearts to the U.S. service members wounded in the December shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola.

Read More
Ships from Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 23 transit the Pacific Ocean Jan. 22, 2020. DESRON 23, part of the Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group, is on a scheduled deployment to the Indo-Pacific. (U.S. Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Erick A. Parsons)

Editor's Note: This article by Gina Harkins originally appeared on Military.com, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

The Navy and Marine Corps need to be a bit more short-sighted when assessing how many ships they need, the acting Navy secretary said this week.

The Navy Department is in the middle of a new force-structure review, which could change the number and types of ships the sea services say they'll need to fight future conflicts. But instead of trying to project what they will need three decades out, which has been the case in past assessments, acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly said the services will take a shorter view.

"I don't know what the threat's going to be 30 years from now, but if we're building a force structure for 30 years from now, I would suggest we're probably not building the right one," he said Friday at a National Defense Industrial Association event.

The Navy completed its last force-structure assessment in 2016. That 30-year plan called for a 355-ship fleet.

Read More
Master-at-Arms 3rd Class Oscar Temores and his family. (GoFundMe)

When Oscar Jesus Temores showed up to work at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story each day, his colleagues in base security knew they were in for a treat.

Temores was a master-at-arms who loved his job and cracking corny jokes.

"He just he just had that personality that you can go up to him and talk to him about anything. It was goofy and weird, and he always had jokes," said Petty Officer 3rd Class Derek Lopez, a fellow base patrolman. "Sometimes he'd make you cry from laughter and other times you'd just want to cringe because of how dumb his joke was. But that's what made him more approachable and easy to be around."

That ability to make others laugh and put people at ease is just one of the ways Temores is remembered by his colleagues. It has been seven weeks since the 23-year-old married father of one was killed when a civilian intruder crashed his pickup truck into Temores' vehicle at Fort Story.

Read More