Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
The VA may be forced to pay billions in veterans' ER bills after court ruling
A federal court has ruled that the Department of Veterans Affairs wrongly denied reimbursements to veterans who received emergency medical care at non-VA facilities, a decision that could result in payouts to veterans totaling billions.
U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims judges wrote Monday that VA's reimbursement regulations, which were instituted in 2018, violated a law that requires VA to approve veterans' claims for emergency room expenses not covered by private insurance.
The case, Wolfe v. Wilkie, marked the second time VA has been overruled on its interpretation of its reimbursement policies. In 2015, the court ruled that a previous version of the VA regulation on emergency claims violated a 2010 law.
According to the appeals court judges, the 2015 ruling was intended to require VA to act as a secondary payer for expenses not covered by an individual's primary private health insurance.
But VA has not been doing that, they said in the Wolfe v. Wilkie decision.
"VA was ... informing veterans that they were not entitled to reimbursement for non-VA emergency medical care if they had any insurance covering the service at issue," wrote the judges. "In other words, the agency was telling veterans that the law was exactly opposite to what a federal court had held the law to be."
According to VA, the department can pay for emergency medical care if the condition is service-related or caused by a service-related condition and services aren't available at a VA facility.
For conditions not considered service-connected, VA can also pay for emergency medical care, but only under certain conditions: care must be provided in a hospital emergency department; care must be given to treat life or health-threatening conditions; the required care must not be available to the veteran at a VA; the veteran must have received care at a VA facility within the past two years.
By law, VA cannot provide coverage for copayments, coinsurance or deductibles, according to its own fact sheet on emergency medical care.
It was for those reasons that VA denied reimbursement to Coast Guard veteran Amanda Wolfe, who experienced appendicitis in September 2016 and sought care at a civilian hospital, since the VA facility was more than three hours away.
She filed a claim for $2,558.54 of the $22,348.25 bill -- the amount not covered by her employer-sponsored health insurance.
She paid the bill in fall 2016 as it went to collections. And in February 2018, VA denied the claim, saying the $2,558.54 was for copayments, deductibles and coinsurance.
Similarly, another plaintiff in the case, Navy veteran Peter Boerschinger, went to a non-VA emergency room with pneumonia and congestive heart failure. While he was hospitalized, physicians made several attempts to transfer him to a VA facility, but no beds were available.
He submitted a claim for $1,340 that was not covered by his health insurance and was denied.
Two of the three judges on the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims said VA's interpretation of the law was incorrect, and they ordered VA to reimburse veterans for all past and future out-of-pocket emergency medical bills not covered by private insurance, other than copayments.
"It's difficult to conceive how an agency could believe that adopting a regulation that mimics the result a federal court held to be unlawful is somehow appropriate when the statute at issue has not changed," the judges wrote.
The National Veterans Legal Services Program and Sidley Austin LLP represented the plaintiffs in the case, which the judges ruled a class action, meaning any affected veteran must be reimbursed.
According to NVLSP, the decision could cost the VA between $1.8 billion and $6.5 billion in reimbursements for claims filed from 2016 through 2025.
"The court's decision rights a terrible injustice and its order ensures that veterans who were unjustly denied reimbursement for critical emergency treatment at non-VA facilities will finally be reimbursed," NVLSP Executive Director Bart Stichman said in a statement.
The VA has been aware of its claims reimbursement problems since at least 2017, when then-Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minnesota, asked the VA to investigate an allegation that the department was more interested in processing claims quickly rather than accurately.
The VA's Office of Inspector General released a report in August confirming Walz's suspicions, finding the VA had improperly processed 31 percent of claims filed by veterans for non-VA emergency services and the amount of incorrect claims denied April 1 through Sept. 30, 2017 -- estimated at $53.3 million -- represented "potential undue financial risk" for roughly 17,400 veterans.
"The audit found that the [VA's] Claims Adjudication and Reimbursement Directorate placed more emphasis on the number of claims processed than the accuracy of the claims decisions," the VA OIG wrote.
VA spokeswoman Susan Carter said the department is aware of the decision "and reviewing it."
In the Wolfe v. Wilkie decision, Judge Joseph Falvey dissented from the majority on procedural issues, writing that he disagreed with his colleagues because Wolfe's case remains under appeal with the VA, and did not believe the appellate court should weigh in while she is exhausting the claims process.
"[Wolfe] doesn't want us to remove an obstacle. Instead, she wants to skip the appeals process entirely and bring her regulatory challenge directly to the court," Falvey wrote.
This article originally appeared on Military.com
More articles from Military.com:
Retired Army Master Sgt. Mark Allen has died 10 years after he was shot in the head while searching for deserter Pvt. Bowe Bergdahl in Afghanistan.
Allen died on Saturday at the age of 46, according to funeral information posted online.
For U.S. service members who have fought alongside the Kurds, President Donald Trump's decision to approve repositioning U.S. forces in Syria ahead of Turkey's invasion is a naked betrayal of valued allies.
"I am ashamed for the first time in my career," one unnamed special operator told Fox News Jennifer Griffin.
In a Twitter thread that went viral, Griffin wrote the soldier told her the Kurds were continuing to support the United States by guarding tens of thousands of ISIS prisoners even though Turkey had nullified an arrangement under which U.S. and Turkish troops were conducting joint patrols in northeastern Syria to allow the Kurdish People's Protection Units, or YPG, to withdraw.
"The Kurds are sticking by us," the soldier told Griffin. "No other partner I have ever dealt with would stand by us."
Defense Secretary Mark Esper said Sunday he and the Pentagon will comply with House Democrats' impeachment inquiry subpoena, but it'll be on their own schedule.
"We will do everything we can to cooperate with the Congress," Esper said on CBS' "Face the Nation." "Just in the last week or two, my general counsel sent out a note — as we typically do in these situations — to ensure documents are retained."
Most of the U.S. troops in Syria are being moved out of the country as Turkish forces and their Arab allies push further into Kurdish territory than originally expected, Task & Purpose has learned.
Roughly 1,000 U.S. troops are withdrawing from Syria, leaving a residual force of between 100 and 150 service members at the Al Tanf garrison, a U.S. official said.
"I spoke with the president last night after discussions with the rest of the national security team and he directed that we begin a deliberate withdrawal of forces from northern Syria," Defense Secretary Mark Esper said on Sunday's edition of CBS News' "Face the Nation."'
More than 700 women and children affiliated with ISIS escape Kurdish prison camp after Turkish shelling
BEIRUT/ISTANBUL (Reuters) - Women affiliated with Islamic State and their children fled en masse from a camp where they were being held in northern Syria on Sunday after shelling by Turkish forces in a five-day-old offensive, the region's Kurdish-led administration said.
Turkey's cross-border attack in northern Syria against Kurdish forces widened to target the town of Suluk which was hit by Ankara's Syrian rebel allies. There were conflicting accounts on the outcome of the fighting.
Turkey is facing threats of possible sanctions from the United States unless it calls off the incursion. Two of its NATO allies, Germany and France, have said they are halting weapons exports to Turkey. The Arab League has denounced the operation.