Thousands Of Student Vets At Ashford University May Soon Lose GI Bill Benefits

Education
Photo via Facebook

Ashford University withdrew its request to receive GI Bill certification in California, further endangering benefits for more than 6,000 veterans attending their mostly online program, according to a report filed Tuesday.


Bridgepoint Education, the university’s parent company, withdrew its request for certification from the state of California on June 30, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission report.

The school’s request withdrawal comes after Iowa postponed a decision to pull GI Bill certification on June 20, giving Ashford until September to seek and receive approval in California.

Iowa pulled Ashford’s approval for GI Bill funding when the university announced their operations would leave the state and move west.

Now, Iowa could be Ashford’s only option for certification.

“It may be more likely that they will lose the ability to accept GI Bill benefits,” said James Schmeling, executive vice president of strategic engagement at Student Veterans of America, a national veterans advocacy group.

Marianne Perez, a spokeswoman for Bridgepoint Education, declined to explain why the company withdrew their request in California.

However, in 2013, the attorney general in California subpoenaed Bridgepoint to investigate alleged violations of financial aid and enrollment practices.

This episode leaves student veterans in the middle of a complicated issue of states granting academic institutions the ability to enroll students using the GI Bill. More than 6,000 troops, veterans and family members attend Ashford, almost exclusively online, according to court documents filed in June.

Students could be left paying tuition out of pocket and foregoing housing stipends after Sept. 18 if Iowa does not postpone or reverse their decision. Staci Hupp, Iowa Department of Education spokeswoman, said the discussion between the state and Ashford is ongoing but no decisions have been made yet.

“Uncertainty for student veterans about their college’s ability to accept GI Bill benefits is disruptive to their future,” Schmeling said, adding he would recommend students attending Ashford to consider a transfer to other schools to avoid further difficulties.

If Ashford cannot grant GI Bill benefits after Sept. 18 and students are left paying thousands of dollars in tuition without monthly housing payments, it could lead to issues such as eviction and homelessness, he said.

A full year of tuition at Ashford is more than $21,000, according to a Department of Veterans Affairs GI Bill benefits calculator.

Ashford University sued the state of Iowa in June to reverse its decision to revoke GI Bill certification, asserting the state misunderstood when and which operations would go to California, according to court filings obtained by Stars and Stripes.

The June 14 suit, filed about two weeks before Ashford withdrew its request from California, also states the company had doubts it could receive certification from that state in a timely manner.

Ashford’s intense focus on receiving certification for the GI Bill stems from the program’s consistent tuition cash flow, which sent $1.7 billion to for-profit schools between from 2012-2013, according to a Senate investigation.

The investigation points to a loophole that observers such as Schmeling contend for-profit schools exploit. Universities are barred from receiving more than 90 percent of their revenue from federal aid programs. The GI Bill is not counted in that number.

The percentage of Ashford’s revenue from federal coffers has risen close to the cap. In 2015, federal aid at Ashford accounted for nearly 81 percent of its revenue, according to the SEC filing.

The loophole allows for-profit schools such as Ashford “to leverage $1 of GI Bill funding to draw $9 in federal aid,” Schmeling said, making veterans especially prized students at these schools, which are closely watched by regulators.

In 2014, Ashford settled a lawsuit with the Iowa attorney general for $7.25 million for what it called “unconscionable sales practices.” Hupp said the attorney general’s office is providing assistance to Iowa’s Department of Education during its ongoing discussion with the university.

———

© 2016 the Stars and Stripes. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

A U.S. Soldier assigned to 10th Special Forces Group (Airborne) runs for cover during a live fire exercise at the 7th Army Training Command, Grafenwoehr Training Area, Germany. (U.S. Army/Gertrud Zach)

A memo circulating over the weekend warning of a "possible imminent attack" against U.S. soldiers in Germany was investigated by Army officials, who found there to not be a serious threat after all.

Read More

The U.S. Navy will name its fourth Ford-class aircraft carrier after Doris Miller, an iconic World War II sailor recognized for his heroism during the Pearl Harbor attack, according to reports in The Honolulu Star-Advertiser and U.S. Naval Institute News.

Acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly is expected to announce the naming of CVN-81 during a ceremony on Monday in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, according to USNI. Two of Miller's nieces are expected to be there, according to the Star-Advertiser.

Read More
Comedian and activist Jon Stewart meets with members of Toxic Exposures in the American Military (TEAM), a coalition of veteran and military service organizations, Jan. 17 on Capitol Hill. (Courtesy of TEAM)

Comedian Jon Stewart has joined forces with veterans groups to make sure service members who have been sickened by toxins from burn pits get the medical care they need, according to the Military Officers Association of America.

"Quite frankly, this is not just about burn pits — it's about the way we go to war as a country," Stewart said during his Jan. 17 visit to Washington, D.C. "We always have money to make war. We need to always have money to take care of what happens to people who are selfless enough, patriotic enough, to wage those wars on our behalf."

Read More
A demonstrator stands outside a security zone before a pro-gun rally, Monday, Jan. 20, 2020, in Richmond, Va. Thousands of pro-gun supporters are expected at the rally to oppose gun control legislation like universal background checks that are being pushed by the newly elected Democratic legislature. (Associated Press/Julio Cortez)

Editor's Note: The following is an op-ed. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Task & Purpose.

Editor's Note: A version of this article originally appeared on the blog of Angry Staff Officer

This morning, the Virginia state capitol in Richmond saw dozens of armed men gathering to demonstrate their support for the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution – the right to bear arms. These men were not merely bearing arms, however; they were fully accoutered in the trappings of what one would call a paramilitary group: helmets, vests, ammunition pouches, camouflage clothing, and other "tactical" necessities, the majority of which are neither tactical nor necessary. Their weapons, too, are bedecked with all sorts of accessories, and are also in the paramilitary lane. Rather than carry rifles or shotguns that one would use for hunting, they instead carry semi-automatic "military grade" weapons, to merely prove that they can.

This is not an uncommon sight in America. Nor has it ever been. Armed groups of angry men have a long and uncomfortable history in the United States. On very rare occasions, these irregulars have done some good against corrupt, power-hungry, and abusive county governments. For the most part, however, they bode no good.

Read More
(U.S. Marine Corps)

How We Found Out explores recent reporting from Task & Purpose, answering questions about how we sourced our stories, what challenges we faced, and offers a behind-the-scenes look at how we cover issues impacting the military and veterans community.

Following a string of news reports on private Facebook group called Marines United, where current and former Marines shared nude photos of their fellow service members, the Corps launched an internal investigation to determine if the incident was indicative of a larger problem facing the military's smallest branch.

In December 2019, Task & Purpose published a feature story written by our editor in chief, Paul Szoldra, which drew from the internal review. In the article, Szoldra detailed the findings of that investigation, which included first-hand accounts from male and female Marines.

Task & Purpose spoke with Szoldra to discuss how he got his hands on the investigation, how he made sense of the more than 100 pages of anecdotes and personal testimony, and asked what, if anything, the Marine Corps may do to correct the problem.

This is the fourth installment in the recurring column How We Found Out.

Read More