Thousands Of Student Vets At Ashford University May Soon Lose GI Bill Benefits

Photo via Facebook

Ashford University withdrew its request to receive GI Bill certification in California, further endangering benefits for more than 6,000 veterans attending their mostly online program, according to a report filed Tuesday.

Bridgepoint Education, the university’s parent company, withdrew its request for certification from the state of California on June 30, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission report.

The school’s request withdrawal comes after Iowa postponed a decision to pull GI Bill certification on June 20, giving Ashford until September to seek and receive approval in California.

Iowa pulled Ashford’s approval for GI Bill funding when the university announced their operations would leave the state and move west.

Now, Iowa could be Ashford’s only option for certification.

“It may be more likely that they will lose the ability to accept GI Bill benefits,” said James Schmeling, executive vice president of strategic engagement at Student Veterans of America, a national veterans advocacy group.

Marianne Perez, a spokeswoman for Bridgepoint Education, declined to explain why the company withdrew their request in California.

However, in 2013, the attorney general in California subpoenaed Bridgepoint to investigate alleged violations of financial aid and enrollment practices.

This episode leaves student veterans in the middle of a complicated issue of states granting academic institutions the ability to enroll students using the GI Bill. More than 6,000 troops, veterans and family members attend Ashford, almost exclusively online, according to court documents filed in June.

Students could be left paying tuition out of pocket and foregoing housing stipends after Sept. 18 if Iowa does not postpone or reverse their decision. Staci Hupp, Iowa Department of Education spokeswoman, said the discussion between the state and Ashford is ongoing but no decisions have been made yet.

“Uncertainty for student veterans about their college’s ability to accept GI Bill benefits is disruptive to their future,” Schmeling said, adding he would recommend students attending Ashford to consider a transfer to other schools to avoid further difficulties.

If Ashford cannot grant GI Bill benefits after Sept. 18 and students are left paying thousands of dollars in tuition without monthly housing payments, it could lead to issues such as eviction and homelessness, he said.

A full year of tuition at Ashford is more than $21,000, according to a Department of Veterans Affairs GI Bill benefits calculator.

Ashford University sued the state of Iowa in June to reverse its decision to revoke GI Bill certification, asserting the state misunderstood when and which operations would go to California, according to court filings obtained by Stars and Stripes.

The June 14 suit, filed about two weeks before Ashford withdrew its request from California, also states the company had doubts it could receive certification from that state in a timely manner.

Ashford’s intense focus on receiving certification for the GI Bill stems from the program’s consistent tuition cash flow, which sent $1.7 billion to for-profit schools between from 2012-2013, according to a Senate investigation.

The investigation points to a loophole that observers such as Schmeling contend for-profit schools exploit. Universities are barred from receiving more than 90 percent of their revenue from federal aid programs. The GI Bill is not counted in that number.

The percentage of Ashford’s revenue from federal coffers has risen close to the cap. In 2015, federal aid at Ashford accounted for nearly 81 percent of its revenue, according to the SEC filing.

The loophole allows for-profit schools such as Ashford “to leverage $1 of GI Bill funding to draw $9 in federal aid,” Schmeling said, making veterans especially prized students at these schools, which are closely watched by regulators.

In 2014, Ashford settled a lawsuit with the Iowa attorney general for $7.25 million for what it called “unconscionable sales practices.” Hupp said the attorney general’s office is providing assistance to Iowa’s Department of Education during its ongoing discussion with the university.


© 2016 the Stars and Stripes. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Editor's Note: This article by Matthew Cox originally appeared, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

U.S. Army aviation officials have launched an effort to restore full air assault capability to the 101st Airborne Division — a capability the Screaming Eagles have been without since 2015.

Read More Show Less

The U.S. military's withdrawal from northeast Syria is looking more like Dunkirk every day.

On Wednesday, the U.S. military had to call in an airstrike on one of its own ammunition dumps in northern Syria because the cargo trucks required to safely remove the ammo are needed elsewhere to support the withdrawal, Task & Purpose has learned.

Read More Show Less

President Donald Trump belittled his former defense secretary, James Mattis, by characterizing him as the "world's most overrated general," according to a Washington Post report published Wednesday.

The account from numerous officials came during an afternoon closed door meeting with congressional leaders in the Cabinet Room of the White House on Wednesday. In the meeting, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer reportedly brought up dissenting views towards the president's decision to withdraw the vast majority of roughly 1,000 U.S. troops stationed in Syria.

Read More Show Less

Retired two-star Navy. Adm. Joe Sestak is the highest ranking — and perhaps, least known — veteran who is trying to clinch the Democratic nomination for president in 2020.

Sestak has decades of military experience, but he is not getting nearly as much media attention as fellow veterans Pete Buttigieg and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii). Another veteran, Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) has dropped out of the race.

Read More Show Less

After preliminary fitness test scores leaked in September, many have voiced concerns about how women would fare in the new Army Combat Fitness Test.

The scores — which accounted for 11 of the 63 battalions that the ACFT was tested on last year — showed an overall failure rate of 84% for women, and a 70% pass rate for men.

But Army leaders aren't concerned about this in the slightest.

Read More Show Less