US Veterans Were Paid By Saudis To Fight 9/11 Families’ Lawsuits

news
The "Tribute in Light" memorial is in remembrance of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
Air Force photo/Denise Gould

Saudi Arabia, a key U.S. ally and home of 15 of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers, was funding an expensive campaign to oppose a law passed by Congress that allows victims’ families to sue any foreign country found to support a terrorist attack that kills U.S. citizens on American soil, the Associated Press reports.


The campaign, carried out by a number of American public relations firms and lobbying  groups, involved paying U.S. veterans to visit Capitol Hill and warn lawmakers about the potential unintended consequences of the bill. Many of the veterans who took those trips were unaware that they were being funded by the Saudi government.

“It was very evident that they weren’t forthcoming; they were telling us the whole truth,” David Casler, a former Marine who was recruited into the campaign, told the AP. “They flat-out lied to us on the first day with the statement: ‘This is not paid for by the Saudi Arabian government.’”

Congress passed the law, the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, or JASTA, in September, overriding a veto by President Barack Obama. The bill didn’t mention any specific countries, but it was obviously aimed at Saudi Arabia. While the 9/11 Commission’s final report found no evidence that the Saudi government or officials funded al-Qaeda, it concluded that the terror group found “fertile fundraising ground in Saudi Arabia.”   

Osama Bin Laden, the mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks, was born and raised in Saudi Arabia. He was expelled from the kingdom in 1991, a few years after founding al Qaeda. However, Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called “20th hijacker,” who is currently serving a life sentence in Colorado for his connections to al Qaeda, testified in 2014 that Saudi leaders had supported the terrorist group with money and coordination up until the 2001 attacks. Moussaoui’s testimony fueled rumors of Saudi involvement in 9/11 that have swirled since the attacks.     

The Saudi Foreign Ministry responded to the passing of JASTA by saying it hoped “wisdom will prevail and that Congress will take the necessary steps to correct this legislation in order to avoid serious unintended consequences that may ensue.” Part of the effort to spread that “wisdom” was carried out by veterans deployed to Washington by a network of lobbying firms.  

Soon after JASTA was passed, a lobbying and public relations firm that represents Saudi Arabia called Qorvis MSLGroup hired 70 subcontractors to alert lawmakers and the general public to “potential legal liabilities arising for U.S. military, intelligence, and diplomatic personnel.”

The chief lobbyist for the Saudi Embassy in Washington told the AP that it had funded the campaign, but that it had encouraged its subcontractors to be as transparent with that fact as possible. Under federal law, anyone working on behalf of a foreign government must register with the U.S. government before beginning work. However, one of the organizations spearheading the campaign, a California-based firm called Capitol Media Group, did not register until three months after it began sending “groups of 25-35” veterans to Capitol Hill.   

Veterans recruited into the campaign had their flights and accommodations — including stays at the Trump International Hotel in Washington —  paid for with Saudi money distributed by the subcontractors, according to Justice Department filings examined by the AP.  The veterans were encouraged to wear their medals when meeting with Congress.

In an interview with the AP, Chuck Tucker, a retired U.S. Air Force major general who took part in the lobbying, said he knew all along that the campaign was being funded by the Saudis.

“You stay with your wingman. We have allies. They’re not perfect, we’re not perfect,” he said. “It’s not like it was blood money. We’re taking money from somebody who is our friend and ally helping us around the world.”

In this June 16, 2018 photo, Taliban fighters greet residents in the Surkhroad district of Nangarhar province, east of Kabul, Afghanistan. (Associated Press/Rahmat Gul)

While the U.S. military wants to keep roughly 8,600 troops in Afghanistan, the Taliban's deputy leader has just made clear that his group wants all U.S. service members to leave the country as part of any peace agreement.

"The withdrawal of foreign forces has been our first and foremost demand," Sirajuddin Haqqani wrote in a story for the New York Times on Thursday.

Read More
U.S. soldiers inspect the site where an Iranian missile hit at Ain al-Asad air base in Anbar province, Iraq January 13, 2020. (REUTERS/John Davison)

In the wee hours of Jan. 8, Tehran retaliated over the U.S. killing of Iran's most powerful general by bombarding the al-Asad air base in Iraq.

Among the 2,000 troops stationed there was U.S. Army Specialist Kimo Keltz, who recalls hearing a missile whistling through the sky as he lay on the deck of a guard tower. The explosion lifted his body - in full armor - an inch or two off the floor.

Keltz says he thought he had escaped with little more than a mild headache. Initial assessments around the base found no serious injuries or deaths from the attack. U.S. President Donald Trump tweeted, "All is well!"

The next day was different.

"My head kinda felt like I got hit with a truck," Keltz told Reuters in an interview from al-Asad air base in Iraq's western Anbar desert. "My stomach was grinding."

Read More
A U.S. military vehicle runs a Russian armored truck off the road in Syria near the Turkish border town of Qamishli (Video screencap)

A video has emerged showing a U.S. military vehicle running a Russian armored truck off the road in Syria after it tried to pass an American convoy.

Questions still remain about the incident, to include when it occurred, though it appears to have taken place on a stretch of road near the Turkish border town of Qamishli, according to The War Zone.

Read More
(U.S. Marine Corps photo)

Editor's Note: The following is an op-ed. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Task & Purpose.

We are women veterans who have served in the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps. Our service – as aviators, ship drivers, intelligence analysts, engineers, professors, and diplomats — spans decades. We have served in times of peace and war, separated from our families and loved ones. We are proud of our accomplishments, particularly as many were earned while immersed in a military culture that often ignores and demeans women's contributions. We are veterans.

Yet we recognize that as we grew as leaders over time, we often failed to challenge or even question this culture. It took decades for us to recognize that our individual successes came despite this culture and the damage it caused us and the women who follow in our footsteps. The easier course has always been to tolerate insulting, discriminatory, and harmful behavior toward women veterans and service members and to cling to the idea that 'a few bad apples' do not reflect the attitudes of the whole.

Recent allegations that Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert Wilkie allegedly sought to intentionally discredit a female veteran who reported a sexual assault at a VA medical center allow no such pretense.

Read More
A cup of coffee during "tea time" discussions between the U.S. Air Force and Japanese Self-Defense Forces at Misawa Air Base, Japan, Feb. 14, 2018 (Air Force photo / Tech. Sgt. Benjamin W. Stratton)

Survival expert and former Special Air Service commando Edward "Bear" Grylls made meme history for drinking his own urine to survive his TV show, Man vs. Wild. But the United States Air Force did Bear one better recently, when an Alaska-based airman peed in an office coffee maker.

While the circumstances of the bladder-based brew remain a mystery, the incident was written up in a newsletter written by the legal office of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on February 13, a base spokesman confirmed to Task & Purpose.

Read More