The VA may have wrongly billed thousands of veterans for more than $50 million for emergency care

news
(DoD photo)

Editor's Note: This article by Richard Sisk originally appeared on Military.com, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

Veterans may have wrongly been billed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for emergency room medical treatment at non-VA facilities totaling at least $53.3 million, according to the office of the VA Inspector General.

Following an audit, the IG estimated that "about 17,400 veterans, with bills totaling at least $53.3 million, were negatively affected" by either initial denial or ultimate rejection of their claims for reimbursement.


The IG also estimated that that "if corrective actions are not taken, these errors could result in $533 million in improper underpayments to claimants over five years."

The IG's 70-page report, titled "Non-VA Emergency Care Claims Inappropriately Denied and Rejected," said the reimbursement issue rested with the VA's Claims Adjudication and Reimbursement Directorate (CAR) in the VA's Office of Community Care.

Although claimants can appeal denied claims, "CAR was not effectively monitoring veterans' appeals of non-VA emergency care claims decisions," the report said, and "when CAR denies a claim, the claimant may have to pay out of pocket for his or her emergency care."

The IG report found that VA processing errors were rampant in the existing system.

The audit's accuracy review found that "31 percent of denied or rejected non-VA emergency care -- with an estimated billed amount of $716 million -- [was] inappropriately processed from April 1 through September 30, 2017, creating the risk of undue financial burden to an estimated 60,800 veterans."

The report noted that not all processing errors resulted in wrong claim denial decisions, but added that "procedural errors created a risk that claimants could not effectively respond with necessary information to obtain claim approval and payment."

The audit was initiated at the request of former Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minnesota, who previously served as ranking member of the House Veterans Affairs Committee.

Based on whistleblower complaints, Walz asked IG to report on allegations that VA "created perverse incentives for its claims processors to deny veterans' emergency care claims to meet production goals and in turn receive high performance appraisal ratings and bonuses."

The results of the audit found that the VA's Claims Adjudication and Reimbursement Directorate did place "more emphasis on the number of claims processed than the accuracy of the claims decisions" in an effort to deal with a growing claims backlog.

At the start of fiscal 2016, claims backlogged more than 30 days totaled 482,000, or 28% of the total of 1.7 million claims, the report said. However, the backlogged claims had increased to 36% of all claims by November 2018, the report said.

In its lengthy responses to the IG's report, the VA generally concurred with the findings while listing a number efforts to improve the accuracy of the reimbursement claims process and make them more timely.

In his response, Dr. Richard Stone, the executive in charge of the Veterans Health Administration, said that "paying claims timely and accurately is a priority for VHA and we take this responsibility very seriously."

"VHA greatly appreciates OIG's findings," Stone said.

He added that CAR had already "self-identified" problems in the reimbursement system and had begun to take corrective action before the IG's report was filed.

The corrective actions included "Initiating nationwide quality and accuracy reviews, specifically on denied and rejected claims, to assess processing accuracy and identify additional staff training needed to address processing error trends," Stone said.

Information on contacting the VA's Customer Call Center on claims can be found here. The IG's full report and the VA's responses can be found here.

This article originally appeared on Military.com

More articles from Military.com:

A UH-60 Black Hawk departs from The Rock while conducting Medevac 101 training with members of the 386th Expeditionary Medical Group, Feb. 16, 2019. (U.S. Air Force Photo/Tech. Sgt. Robert Cloys)

A Minnesota Army National Guard UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter with three Guardsmen aboard crashed south of St. Cloud on Thursday, said National Guard spokeswoman Army Master Sgt. Blair Heusdens.

At this time, the National Guard is not releasing any information about the status of the three people aboard the helicopter, Heusdens told Task & Purpose on Thursday.

Read More Show Less

The Pentagon's latest attempt to twist itself in knots to deny that it is considering sending up to 14,000 troops to the Middle East has a big caveat.

Pentagon spokeswoman Alyssa Farah said there are no plans to send that many troops to the region "at this time."

Farah's statement does not rule out the possibility that the Defense Department could initially announce a smaller deployment to the region and subsequently announce that more troops are headed downrange.

Read More Show Less

The Navy could send a second aircraft carrier to the Middle East if President Donald Trump orders a surge of forces to the region, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday said on Thursday.

Gordon Lubold and Nancy Youssef of the Wall Street Journal first reported the United States is considering sending up to 14,000 troops to the Middle East to deter Iran from attacking U.S. forces and regional allies. The surge forces could include several ships.

Read More Show Less

I didn't think a movie about World War I would, or even could, remind me of Afghanistan.

Somehow 1917 did, and that's probably the highest praise I can give Sam Mendes' newest war drama: It took a century-old conflict and made it relatable.

Read More Show Less

An internal investigation spurred by a nude photo scandal shows just how deep sexism runs in the Marine Corps

"I will still have to work harder to get the perception away from peers and seniors that women can't do the job."

news
(U.S. Marine Corps photo)

Some years ago, a 20-year-old female Marine, a military police officer, was working at a guard shack screening service members and civilians before they entered the base. As a lance corporal, she was new to the job and the duty station, her first in the Marine Corps.

At some point during her shift, a male sergeant on duty drove up. Get in the car, he said, the platoon sergeant needs to see you. She opened the door and got in, believing she was headed to see the enlisted supervisor of her platoon.

Instead, the sergeant drove her to a dark, wooded area on base. It was deserted, no other Marines were around. "Hey, I want a blowjob," the sergeant told her.

"What am I supposed, what do you do as a lance corporal?" she would later recall. "I'm 20 years old ... I'm new at this. You're the only leadership I've ever known, and this is what happens."

She looked at him, then got out of the car and walked away. The sergeant drove up next to her and tried to play it off as a prank. "I'm just fucking with you," he said. "It's not a big deal."

It was one story among hundreds of others shared by Marines for a study initiated in July 2017 by the Marine Corps Center for Advanced Operational Culture Learning (CAOCL). Finalized in March 2018, the center's report was quietly published to its website in September 2019 with little fanfare.

The culture of the Marine Corps is ripe for analysis. A 2015 Rand Corporation study found that women felt far more isolated among men in the Corps, while the Pentagon's Office of People Analytics noted in 2018 that female Marines rated hostility toward them as "significantly higher" than their male counterparts.

But the center's report, Marines' Perspectives on Various Aspects of Marine Corps Organizational Culture, offers a proverbial wakeup call to leaders, particularly when paired alongside previous studies, since it was commissioned by the Marine Corps itself in the wake of a nude photo sharing scandal that rocked the service in 2017.

The scandal, researchers found, was merely a symptom of a much larger problem.

Read More Show Less