The VA may have wrongly billed thousands of veterans for more than $50 million for emergency care

(DoD photo)

Editor's Note: This article by Richard Sisk originally appeared on, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

Veterans may have wrongly been billed by the Department of Veterans Affairs for emergency room medical treatment at non-VA facilities totaling at least $53.3 million, according to the office of the VA Inspector General.

Following an audit, the IG estimated that "about 17,400 veterans, with bills totaling at least $53.3 million, were negatively affected" by either initial denial or ultimate rejection of their claims for reimbursement.

The IG also estimated that that "if corrective actions are not taken, these errors could result in $533 million in improper underpayments to claimants over five years."

The IG's 70-page report, titled "Non-VA Emergency Care Claims Inappropriately Denied and Rejected," said the reimbursement issue rested with the VA's Claims Adjudication and Reimbursement Directorate (CAR) in the VA's Office of Community Care.

Although claimants can appeal denied claims, "CAR was not effectively monitoring veterans' appeals of non-VA emergency care claims decisions," the report said, and "when CAR denies a claim, the claimant may have to pay out of pocket for his or her emergency care."

The IG report found that VA processing errors were rampant in the existing system.

The audit's accuracy review found that "31 percent of denied or rejected non-VA emergency care -- with an estimated billed amount of $716 million -- [was] inappropriately processed from April 1 through September 30, 2017, creating the risk of undue financial burden to an estimated 60,800 veterans."

The report noted that not all processing errors resulted in wrong claim denial decisions, but added that "procedural errors created a risk that claimants could not effectively respond with necessary information to obtain claim approval and payment."

The audit was initiated at the request of former Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minnesota, who previously served as ranking member of the House Veterans Affairs Committee.

Based on whistleblower complaints, Walz asked IG to report on allegations that VA "created perverse incentives for its claims processors to deny veterans' emergency care claims to meet production goals and in turn receive high performance appraisal ratings and bonuses."

The results of the audit found that the VA's Claims Adjudication and Reimbursement Directorate did place "more emphasis on the number of claims processed than the accuracy of the claims decisions" in an effort to deal with a growing claims backlog.

At the start of fiscal 2016, claims backlogged more than 30 days totaled 482,000, or 28% of the total of 1.7 million claims, the report said. However, the backlogged claims had increased to 36% of all claims by November 2018, the report said.

In its lengthy responses to the IG's report, the VA generally concurred with the findings while listing a number efforts to improve the accuracy of the reimbursement claims process and make them more timely.

In his response, Dr. Richard Stone, the executive in charge of the Veterans Health Administration, said that "paying claims timely and accurately is a priority for VHA and we take this responsibility very seriously."

"VHA greatly appreciates OIG's findings," Stone said.

He added that CAR had already "self-identified" problems in the reimbursement system and had begun to take corrective action before the IG's report was filed.

The corrective actions included "Initiating nationwide quality and accuracy reviews, specifically on denied and rejected claims, to assess processing accuracy and identify additional staff training needed to address processing error trends," Stone said.

Information on contacting the VA's Customer Call Center on claims can be found here. The IG's full report and the VA's responses can be found here.

This article originally appeared on

More articles from

Jason Venne (Hampden Superior Court)

SPRINGFIELD, Mass. — A woman has filed a civil suit against a former member of the 104th Fighter Wing of the Air National Guard, saying she has suffered emotional distress and "a diminished capacity to enjoy life" in the years since he used a hidden camera at Barnes Air National Guard Base to record explicit images of her.

Former Tech Sgt. Jason Venne, 37, pleaded guilty in February to six counts of photographing an unsuspecting person in the nude and seven counts of unlawful wiretap. He admitted putting a camera in the women's locker room at the Westfield base, recording images and video between 2011 and 2013 when he worked there as a mechanic.

Read More Show Less
(DoD photo)

Five people have been indicted in federal court in the Western District of Texas on charges of participating in a scheme to steal millions of dollars from benefits reserved for military members, U.S. Department of Justice officials said Wednesday.

Read More Show Less
In this March 24, 2017, photo, bottles of hemp oil, or CBD, are for sale at the store Into The Mystic in Mission, Kansas. (Associated Press/The Kansas City Star/Allison Long)

Editor's Note: This article by Patricia Kime originally appeared, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

As the military services each roll out new policies regarding hemp-derived products like cannabidiol, or CBD, the Defense Department is not mincing words.

"It's completely forbidden for use by any service member in any of the services at this point of time," said Patricia Deuster, director of the Human Performance Laboratory at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland.

The warning, along with the policies issued recently by the Air Force, Coast Guard and Department of the Navy, comes as CBD is becoming increasingly ubiquitous across the country in many forms, from coffee additives and vaping liquids to tinctures, candies and other foods, carrying promises of health benefits ranging from pain and anxiety relief to sleeping aids and inflammation reduction.

Read More Show Less

The Navy has fired five senior leaders so far in August – and the month isn't even over.

While the sea service is famous for instilling in officers that they are responsible for any wrongdoing by their sailors – whether they are aware of the infractions or not – the recent rash of firings is a lot, even for the Navy.

A Navy spokesman said there is no connection between any of the five officers relieved of command, adding that each relief is looked at separately.

Read More Show Less
Then-Vice Chief of Staff Gen. James McConville. (U.S. Army/Spc. Matthew J. Marcellus)

After months of focusing on modernization priorities, Army leadership plans to tackle persisting personnel issues in the coming years.

Acting Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said Tuesday at an event with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies that what people can to hear service leadership "talk a lot about ... our people. Investing in our people, so that they can reach their potential. ... We are a people organization."

Read More Show Less