Here’s Why Veterans Groups Are Circling The Wagons Around Embattled VA Secretary Shulkin

Analysis

Leading veterans service organizations met Tuesday to mount a joint response in the face of a troubling inspector general report alleging “serious derelictions” in expensing on the part of the Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin and his top staff during a Europe trip last July, multiple sources told Task & Purpose.


The groups — including the largest VSOs, dubbed the “big six” — were prepared to call for the Trump administration to retain the embattled VA secretary, but have so far held off on sending a formal letter. (That same afternoon, USA Today reported that the VA’s top official “received assurances” from the White House that his position at the department is, for the time being, safe.)

Based on the recent statements from leading veterans service organizations, the mistakes detailed in the 97-page report appear to be overshadowed by concerns of a power struggle within the VA — one allegedly perpetrated by pro-privatization operatives within the department, with the goal of ousting Shulkin. And it’s that final point, that may have caused veterans groups to gather.

Put another way, the rallying cry for Shulkin amounts to: Better the VA chief we know…

Related: VA OIG: Shulkin And His Staff Committed ‘Serious Derelictions’ In Expensing Europe Trip »

A federal institution with a proposed budget of nearly $200 billion for fiscal year 2019, the Department of Veterans Affairs oversees the largest integrated health care system in the United States, and there are concerns among veterans organizations, advocates, and lawmakers, that it’s a ripe target for special interest groups seeking to turn a profit through privatizing aspects of the Veterans Health Administration — the VA’s medical arm.

In an interview with Task & Purpose, one veterans service organization official equated VA health care privatization to “robbing Peter, to pay Paul, while John bleeds out.” In this analogy, Peter’s the VA, and veterans are John.

Since Feb. 19, the largest veterans organizations, AMVETS, Vietnam Veterans of America, Veterans of Foreign Wars, The American Legion, Disabled American Veterans, and Paralyzed Veterans of America, have rallied around the embattled secretary, advocating for Shulkin to remain at his post.

Though the messages vary between the VSOs individual statements, the tone is consistent, portraying a mix of disappointment over the actions detailed in the travel report, support for Shulkin’s past efforts, and concern over stories of a VA harried by inner turmoil.

Related: Lawmakers Slam VA Chief After Lavish European Trip Expenses »

The disappointment stems from the secretary and his staff’s decision-making during the 10-day Europe trip last year, which according to the Feb. 14 report, cost taxpayers $122,000; included five and-a-half days of sightseeing in Copenhagen and London; and came with allegations of wrongfully accepted gifts; and the claim that Shulkin’s now-retired chief of staff doctored an email so the secretary’s wife’s airfare could be billed to the VA. Shulkin has disputed the reports findings but agreed to repay the cost of travel and to pay back the value of a pair of improperly accepted Wimbledon tickets.

In their statements supporting the VA chief, veterans organizations cited Shulkin’s unanimous approval by the Senate — nearly a year to the day the inspector general report was released — and the VA’s efforts under Shulkin to improve the Post-9/11 GI Bill, reduce wait time for appeals, and expand mental health care for transitioning service members.

But veterans groups are worried that privatization advocates are using the IG report to get their way.

Related: The Knives Are Out For VA Secretary Shulkin »

“The news media over the past week has reported on the disingenuous actions of a few political appointees in Washington who are attempting to undermine” veterans support and confidence in the VA, reads the Veterans of Foreign Wars statement. “The acts of these individuals have become a cancer inside this Administration. They sow doubt, they create turmoil, and their ideological agenda clearly puts outside interests ahead of the care and well-being of millions of wounded, ill and injured veterans.”

Veterans service organization officials who spoke with Task & Purpose, have claimed that political appointees — some of whom were previously affiliated with Concerned Veterans for America, a conservative veterans advocacy group backed by the Koch brothers — have been pushing an agenda from within the VA for greater privatization.

That’s an accusation CVA is denying.

“Frankly I think there’ve been a lot of outright lies, and misrepresentation where Concerned Veterans for America fits in, in all of this, and what our relationship was like — and what we thought it was like — with Shulkin,” Dan Caldwell, the executive director for CVA, told Task & Purpose. In a previous email to T&P;, Caldwell described that relationship as such: “...despite what some have said — CVA has always had a good working relationship with Shulkin. We wouldn’t want to push him out —  he has brought us to table like no one has before. He is also for the most part aligned with us.”

Though the VA did not respond to Task & Purpose’s request for comment about Shulkin’s “work relationship” with CVA, Caldwell emailed several press releases, social media posts, and news articles citing members of CVA, usually Caldwell, praising Shulkin.

“It’s quite clear that you have people, certain veterans service organizations and others, who are quite clearly pushing the narrative that we’re involved in this,” Caldwell said, before speculating that when the VA secretary’s policy has aligned with CVAs, it’s drawn the ire of other organizations, who see those moves as too close to privatization efforts. “They basically needed somebody who’s going to be the bad guy in all this,” he added.

WATCH NEXT:

Want to read more from Task & Purpose? Sign up for our daily newsletter »

Getty Images/Aaron P. Bernstein

NAVAL BASE SAN DIEGO — An enlisted Navy SEAL sniper testified on Wednesday that Chief Eddie Gallagher told his platoon prior to their deployment that if they ever captured a wounded fighter, their medics knew "what to do to nurse them to death."

In early morning testimony, former Special Operator 1st Class Dylan Dille told a packed courtroom that he had heard the phrase during unit training before the men of SEAL Team 7 Alpha Platoon deployed to Mosul, Iraq in 2017.

Read More Show Less
(U.S. Army photo)

A Navy SEAL sentenced to one year in prison for the death of Army Special Forces Staff Sgt. Logan Melgar is under investigation for allegedly flirting with Melgar's widow while using a false name and trying to persuade her that he and another SEAL accused of killing her husband were "really good guys," according to the Washington Post.

Read More Show Less
(U.S. Army/Capt. Jason Welch)

Soldiers with the 3rd Cavalry Regiment from Fort Hood, Texas, returned from a deployment to Iraq, Syria, and Kuwait, in February 60 combat badges richer.

Read More Show Less
Photo: Sgt. 1st Class Andrew Porch/U.S. Army

Army Staff Sgt. Albert Leon Mampre, who served during World War II with the famed Easy Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division depicted in the HBO series 'Band of Brothers,' was laid to rest on June 15th, the Army announced

Mampre, who died on May 31 at 97 years old, was the last living medic from Easy Company, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. A number of soldiers assigned to his unit provided an honor guard for his funeral service.

Read More Show Less

In his seven months as legislative assistant to the commandant of the Marine Corps, Brig. Gen. Norman Cooling proved to be an abusive, bullying boss, who openly disparaged women, ruled through intimidation, and attempted to spread a rumor about a female officer after the Senate complained about him to the defense secretary, according to a Defense Department's Inspector General's Office investigation.

"The adjectives a majority of witnesses used to describe his leadership were abusive, bullying, toxic, abrasive, and aggressive,"a DoD IG report on the investigation into Cooling's conduct found. "Some subordinates considered him an 'equal opportunity offender,' disparaging men and women. BGen Cooling denied making some of the comments attributed to him, but more than one witness told us they heard him make each of the comments described in this section of our report."

Read More Show Less