Fight between Kelly and Hegseth over ‘unlawful orders’ video headed to court

The Arizona senator and Navy veteran sued Hegseth and the Department of Defense on Monday, saying actions against him would cause a chilling effect on veterans' speech
Alt text: PHOENIX, ARIZONA - MARCH 17: U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) takes questions from press after a town hall at NOAH Cholla Health Center on March 17, 2025 in Scottsdale, Arizona. The town hall was held to address the concerns about possible Medicaid budget cuts after House Republicans approved a budget proposal that requires $880 billion in cuts from the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid. (Photo by Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)
Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) warned in his lawsuit that actions against him could create a chilling effect on speech for retired service members. Photo by Rebecca Noble via Getty Images.

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) asked a federal judge on Monday to immediately quash Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s plan to launch an investigation of the senator aimed at reducing his retired military rank and pension. In a lawsuit filed in federal court, Kelly said Hegseth was pursuing legal action to “signal to retired service members” that they could face “retaliation” for speaking out against Pentagon policies. 

Hegseth’s move, Kelly said, “signals to retired service members and Members of Congress that criticism of the Executive’s use of the armed forces may be met with retaliation through military channels.”

A move to demote Kelly in retirement over a November video message, the suit said, was “unconstitutional and legally baseless.”

In a statement to Task & Purpose after publication, a Defense Department official said: “We are aware of the litigation. However, as a matter of policy, the Department does not comment on ongoing litigation.”

Top Stories This Week

Filed in the District Court for Washington, D.C., Kelly’s lawsuit lists Hegseth, the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy and Navy Secretary John Phelan as defendants and asks the court to issue an emergency relief by Friday, Jan. 16.

The suit is the latest escalation in the fight between the senator and the secretary after Hegseth moved to censure Kelly and start a process to reduce his rank last week. Hegseth had previously threatened to prosecute Kelly,  a retired Navy captain, combat pilot and astronaut, for a Nov. 18 video urging troops not to follow unlawful military orders. Kelly was one of six current members of Congress with intelligence and military backgrounds who released a video aimed at American service members in the early weeks of the Pentagon’s bombing campaign of vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.

In the video, Kelly said: “Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders.” Neither Kelly nor the other congress members in the video directly accused the president and or Hegseth of issuing any such illegal orders.

In response to the video, Trump posted on social media that the message was “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR punishable by DEATH!” Hegseth quickly announced he was considering legal options against the senator, including a court-martial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, based on his status as a retired captain.

Last week, Hegseth ordered an administrative review of Kelly, to be led by the Navy, which could reduce his retirement rank, which would also reduce his military pension.

“Pete Hegseth is coming after what I earned through my twenty-five years of military service, in violation of my rights as an American, as a retired veteran, and as a United States Senator whose job is to hold him — and this or any administration — accountable,” Kelly said in a statement today after filing the suit. “His unconstitutional crusade against me sends a chilling message to every retired member of the military: if you speak out and say something that the President or Secretary of Defense doesn’t like, you will be censured, threatened with demotion, or even prosecuted.”

Hegseth also wrote and released a Secretarial Letter of Censure of Kelly, saying that the senator was undermining the chain of command and creating confusion about duty. Last week, Kelly called the censure and the efforts to prosecute him “nonsense.” 

Kelly is seeking to get the court to declare the actions against him unlawful and vacate them. Kelly is presented by Paul Fishman with the firm Arnold & Porter.

Update: 1/12/2026; This story has been updated with comment from a Defense official.

 

Task & Purpose Video

Each week on Tuesdays and Fridays our team will bring you analysis of military tech, tactics, and doctrine.

 
Nicholas Slayton Avatar

Nicholas Slayton

Contributing Editor

Nicholas Slayton is a Contributing Editor for Task & Purpose. In addition to covering breaking news, he writes about history, shipwrecks, and the military’s hunt for unidentified anomalous phenomenon (formerly known as UFOs).


Matt White Avatar

Matt White

Senior Editor

Matt White is a senior editor at Task & Purpose. He was a pararescueman in the Air Force and the Alaska Air National Guard for eight years and has more than a decade of experience in daily and magazine journalism.