Here's What Mattis Sees As The Biggest Single Problem With Military Leadership In The Information Age

Leadership
DoD photo

Editor’s Note: The following is an excerpt from Lead Yourself First: Inspiring Leadership Through Solitude, a new book by Raymond M. Kethledge and Michael S. Erwin.


Of all the decisions Dwight Eisenhower ever made as a leader, none was more important than his decision to launch the D-Day invasion on June 6, 1944 rather than two weeks later.  That decision brought great risk:  at the time Eisenhower made it, there was a strong possibility that the weather would prevent any reinforcements from landing on June 7, in which case the troops who landed the day before might be pushed out to sea.  But a decision to delay the invasion would have brought great risks of a different sort, not least that the Germans would find out where the Allies planned to land.  Eisenhower had to weigh all those risks, and choose between them.  He did so only after obtaining—through deliberate effort—the greatest possible clarity as to which choice offered the best chance of success.

Gen. of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower.Wikimedia Commons

Eisenhower found that clarity through solitude.  On June 3, 1944, he went to his tent alone and wrote a memorandum to himself, in which he distilled his thoughts down to a single rule that would guide him in the days ahead:  “We must go unless there is a real and very serious deterioration in the weather.”  And it was precisely that rule that Ike applied in the early morning of June 5, when he gave the order to launch the invasion.

Solitude—meaning the state of being alone with one’s thoughts, without input from others—has been instrumental to the effectiveness of leaders throughout history.  Martin Luther King Jr. found moral courage while sitting alone at his table one night during the Montgomery bus boycott.  Jane Goodall used her intuition while alone in the jungles of central Africa, learning how to approach chimps.  Thomas Edward Lawrence (“of Arabia”) devised the concept of insurgency while laid up with a fever in a tent.  And Abraham Lincoln used solitude to regain his emotional balance after his most painful setback as commander in chief during the Civil War.

But leaders today (along with everyone else) are losing solitude with hardly any awareness of the fact.  “If I was to sum up the single biggest problem of senior leadership in the Information Age, it’s a lack of reflection,” says retired four-star Marine Corps General James Mattis.  “Solitude allows you to reflect while others are reacting.  We need solitude to refocus on prospective decision-making, rather than just reacting to problems as they arise.  You have some external stimulus, then you go back to your experience, your education, and you see what needs to be done.”

These days that kind of reflection takes a conscious effort.  For if an essential element of solitude is mental isolation, its antithesis is accessibility; and the minds of our leaders today are accessible as never before.  The point hardly needs elaboration:  e-mails, texts, tweets, and the rest, not to mention the Internet itself, all swarm about us with input from other minds.  There are benefits to that phenomenon—some of the bites, so to speak, are salutary—but for leaders especially, there ought to be a lot more screened-off areas than there are now.

DoD photo

Yet there are ways to overcome all these obstacles.  Some ways are simple:  productive solitude is found as easily in the interstices of life as in its wide-open spaces.  Driving on a highway, sitting in a waiting room, and dressing for work are all good times to think.  Other ways require more discipline.  A leader can mark off sixty minutes on her calendar each day for time to think.  A leader can make it known that he does not text, and checks his e-mail only intermittently or at certain points in the day.  A leader can designate weekends as periods for no work-related e-mails to be sent at all.  Or better yet a leader can do all these things.  

Solitude allows a leader to identify her first principles and then to stay connected with them.  Those principles are the wellspring of all the benefits that solitude provides:  clarity, creativity, emotional balance, and moral courage.  A leader out of touch with his first principles will eventually run short of all these things.  With a lack of direction internally, he will become directed externally.  He will find himself governed by optics.  He will have an uneasy awareness of a gap between what he thinks he believes, and what he in fact chooses to do.  And when others see the gap—when they say he is phony or hypocritical, and discount his leadership accordingly—he will have nothing to draw upon inside.

An authentic leader finds herself on different ground altogether.  A leader who identifies her first principles, and then periodically measures her actions against them, is likely to act in accordance with them.  That kind of leadership is inner-directed; and an inner-directed leader is unlikely to be diverted by moral criticism or praise.  That is not to say a leader should be close-minded.  For the leader who has reflected deeply on her first principles, however, the criticism or praise that ultimately matters most is her own.  

It is only this kind of leader—clear, balanced, courageous—who truly leads.

Raymond M. Kethledge is a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Michael S. Erwin is a three-tour combat veteran and the founder of a veteran-support nonprofit, Team Red White & Blue, as well as the CEO of the Character and Leadership Center and the president of the Positivity Project. Together they are the co-authors of Lead Yourself First: Inspiring Leadership Through Solitude, published by Bloomsbury.

WATCH NEXT:

The San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock ship USS Arlington. (U.S. Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Chris Roys)

The Navy is investigating reports that a female Marine discovered a hidden camera in one of the women's restrooms aboard the USS Arlington, an amphibious transport dock that's currently on at port in Greece, NBC News originally reported.

Read More Show Less
The sun sets behind a C-17 Globemaster III at Joint Base Balad, Iraq, as Soldiers wait in line to board Nov. 17, 2008. (Air Force/Tech Sgt. Erik Gudmundson)

Today, an American service member died in a "non-combat incident" in Ninawa Province, Iraq according to a statement by Operation Inherent Resolve, the U.S.-led coalition fighting the Islamic State.

Read More Show Less

First came the explosion. Then, the cover-up.

"I held one [sailor] in my hands as he passed. He died in my arms."

news
USS Iowa on April 19, 1989. (Wikipedia Commons)

It's been 30 years since an explosion inside the number two gun turret on the USS Iowa killed 47 American sailors, but for Mike Carr, it still feels like yesterday.

"I knew all 47 guys inside that turret because as part of the ship's policy we had rotated between all three turrets," Carr, who served as a gunner's mate in the Iowa's aft 16-inch turret, told Task & Purpose. "We all knew each other rather intimately."

On April 19, 1989, the day of the blast, the ship was preparing for live-fire training at Vieques, Puerto Rico Naval Training Range.

Carr was wearing headphones that allowed him to hear what the crews in the other turrets were saying.

"At 10 minutes to 10 a.m., somebody came over the phones and said, 'We're having a problem, Turret 2, center gun,'" Carr recalled. "Then approximately two minutes later, I recognized Senior Chief [Reginald] Ziegler, who was the chief in charge of Turret 2, yell into the phones: 'Fire, fire, fire! Fire in center gun, turret 2. Trying to contain it.'"

Then came the blast, which was so strong that it ripped the headphones right off Carr's head.

Read More Show Less

Barracks to business: Hiring veterans has never been easier

Organizations offer training, certifications, networking to connect veterans, businesses

career
Jason Sutton

As a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and a newly minted second lieutenant, I felt well-prepared to tackle the challenges facing a junior field artillery officer in the U.S. Army. When the time came to leave the Army, however, I was much less prepared to make the transition into the yet-unknown civilian sector.

One of the primary issues facing veterans after we transition is that we lack the same sense of purpose and mission that we had with our military careers. Today, more than ever, our service members volunteer to put themselves in harm's way. They are defending our freedom across the globe and should be recognized as our country's true heroes. It's critical that employers educate veterans and provide viable options so we can make informed decisions about the rest of our lives.

Read More Show Less
Maj. Gen. David Furness

The two-star general in charge of the roughly 15,000-strong 2nd Marine Division has turned micromanagement into an art form with a new policy letter ordering his Marines and sailors to cut their hair, shave their faces, and adhere to a daily schedule that he has prescribed.

In his "Policy Letter 5-19," Maj. Gen. David Furness lamented that he has noticed "a significant decline in the basic discipline" of troops he's come in contact with in the division area, which has led him to "FIX IT immediately," instead of relying on the thousands of commissioned and non-commissioned officers below him to carry out his orders.

Read More Show Less