Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
What comes next in the pursuit of Julian Assange
A bearded (and quite pale) Julian Assange was dragged from the Ecuadorian embassy on Thursday, which the UK Home Office says came "in relation to a provisional extradition request" from the United States. The Department of Justice has charged him with "conspiracy to commit computer intrusion" with then-Army Intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning.
So what now?
Following Assange's arrest, he was taken before the Westminster Magistrates Court. According to BBC News' Daniel Sandford, he was found guilty of failing to surrender to bail in June 2012; Assange's lawyers argued he would not have faced a fair trial, forcing him to seek refuge at the Ecuadorian embassy that same month, per CNN.
He will face the Southwark Crown Court at an unknown date for sentencing on the bail charge, which the AP reports could be up to 12 months behind bars. His next known court appearance is scheduled for May 2, "by video link," per Sandford, "on the extradition matter."
The DoJ clams in the indictment, in 2010, Assange "agreed to assist Manning in cracking a password" to access Pentagon computers connected to a government network containing classified material. Per the DoJ, Assange "actively" encouraged Manning to provide him with classified documents.
The indictment also says that "part of the conspiracy" was that Assange and Manning used a "special folder on a cloud drop box ... to transmit classified records containing information related to the national defense of the United States."If found guilty, he could face up to five years in prison.
"The primary purpose of the conspiracy was ... transmission of classified information related to the national defense of the United States so that WikiLeaks could publicly disseminate the information on its website,' the DoJ wrote.
National security attorney Brad Moss detailed the next steps for extradition in an interview with Task & Purpose; the first is that the U.S. government will submit a packet to the British government which outlines the basis for extradition, and assure them that this is "a legitimate prosecution for viable and serious crimes and it's not just political persecution."
"What the government submits will no-doubt be viewed initially as more than sufficient, I certainly assume Mr. Assange's team will try to challenge it, which may delay his ultimate extradition by weeks or months," Moss said. "They'll try to drag it into the courts claiming this is just persecution of him for his political views and his publishing of documents that were damaging the United States government. I expect that will fail."
The argument in defense of Assange you'll continue to see over the next few days hinges on press freedom concerns. While some argue that Assange's arrest sets a dangerous precedent, the DOJ says his charges are specifically related to computer hacking, not the publishing of classified documents.
Whistleblower Edward Snowden tweeted that the arrest is "a dark moment for press freedom," and the director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project Ben Wizner said in a statement that prosecuting Assange for WikiLeaks' publishing "would open the door to criminal investigations of other news organizations."
DoJ spokesman Joshua Stueve, when asked by Task & Purpose for comment about press freedom concerns, responded that "the charges are conspiracy to hack classified U.S. government computer systems. There is no reference to journalism or publishing in the indictment. Computer hacking is not a function of journalism."
"My original concerns that any prosecution of Assange would potentially implicate broader policy ramifications about press freedoms ... thankfully have been put to the side," Moss told Task & Purpose. "This is a very narrow indictment, it only deals with the conspiracy to hack the government system."
Moss said the extradition of Assange to the U.S. could take anywhere from days to months. Meanwhile, Assange will be kept in custody until his next hearing in May, CNN reports; his attorney Jennifer Robinson, speaking to reporters after she met with her client on Thursday, said he had one message to give: "I told you so."
SEE ALSO: Chelsea Manning Is Headed Back To Jail
- Julian Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy: Timeline - BBC News ›
- Julian Assange Charged by U.S. With Conspiracy to Hack a ... ›
- Julian Assange: US justice department says he faces five years in ... ›
'It just happened' — the Iraq War’s first living Medal of Honor recipient recalls his harrowing fight against 5 insurgents
On Nov, 10, 2004, Army Staff Sgt. David Bellavia knew that he stood a good chance of dying as he tried to save his squad.
Bellavia survived the intense enemy fire and went on to single-handedly kill five insurgents as he cleared a three-story house in Fallujah during the iconic battle for the city. For his bravery that day, President Trump will present Bellavia with the Medal of Honor on Tuesday, making him the first living Iraq war veteran to receive the award.
In an interview with Task & Purpose, Bellavia recalled that the house where he fought insurgents was dark and filled with putrid water that flowed from broken pipes. The battle itself was an assault on his senses: The stench from the water, the darkness inside the home, and the sounds of footsteps that seemed to envelope him.
With the Imperial Japanese Army hot on his heels, Oscar Leonard says he barely slipped away from getting caught in the grueling Bataan Death March in 1942 by jumping into a choppy bay in the dark of the night, clinging to a log and paddling to the Allied-fortified island of Corregidor.
After many weeks of fighting there and at Mindanao, he was finally captured by the Japanese and spent the next several years languishing under brutal conditions in Filipino and Japanese World War II POW camps.
Now, having just turned 100 years old, the Antioch resident has been recognized for his 42-month ordeal as a prisoner of war, thanks to the efforts of his friends at the Brentwood VFW Post #10789 and Congressman Jerry McNerney.
McNerney, Brentwood VFW Commander Steve Todd and Junior Vice Commander John Bradley helped obtain a POW award after doing research and requesting records to surprise Leonard during a birthday party last month.
Hundreds of Marines will join their British counterparts at a massive urban training center this summer that will test the leathernecks' ability to fight a tech-savvy enemy in a crowded city filled with innocent civilians.
The North Carolina-based Kilo Company, 3rd Battalion, 8th Marines, will test drones, robots and other high-tech equipment at Muscatatuck Urban Training Center near Butlerville, Indiana, in August.
They'll spend weeks weaving through underground tunnels and simulating fires in a mock packed downtown city center. They'll also face off against their peers, who will be equipped with off-the-shelf drones and other gadgets the enemy is now easily able to bring to the fight.
It's the start of a four-year effort, known as Project Metropolis, that leaders say will transform the way Marines train for urban battles. The effort is being led by the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory, based in Quantico, Virginia. It comes after service leaders identified a troubling problem following nearly two decades of war in the Middle East: adversaries have been studying their tactics and weaknesses, and now they know how to exploit them.
WASHINGTON/RIYADH (Reuters) - President Donald Trump imposed new U.S. sanctions onIran on Monday following Tehran's downing of an unmanned American drone and said the measures would target Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Trump told reporters he was signing an executive order for the sanctions amid tensions between the United States and Iran that have grown since May, when Washington ordered all countries to halt imports of Iranian oil.
Trump also said the sanctions would have been imposed regardless of the incident over the drone. He said the supreme leaders was ultimately responsible for what Trump called "the hostile conduct of the regime."
"Sanctions imposed through the executive order ... will deny the Supreme Leader and the Supreme Leader's office, and those closely affiliated with him and the office, access to key financial resources and support," Trump said.
While it can be difficult to peg down just how star-spangled a state is, one indicator is the rate at which citizens enlist in the military, especially during the United States' longest period of sustained conflict. At least, that's the thinking behind WalletHub's new study, 2019's Most Patriotic States in America.