SOCOM's 'Iron Man' suit may be dead, but its futuristic tech may end up in an armory near you

Military Tech

VIDEO: The Army's 'Soldier Of The Future'

U.S. military officials may have abandoned their dreams of powered armor straight out of Starship Troopers, but the futuristic components of America's first prototype combat exoskeleton could eventually end up in the arsenals of both U.S. special operations forces and conventional troops.


First introduced in 2013, U.S. Special Operations Command's Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit (TALOS) purported to offer a slew of capabilities integrated into a unified, armor-plated exoskeleton that led the media to dub the project the "Iron Man suit." But in February, SOCOM officials confirmed that America's first real attempt at powered armor wasn't ready for prime time.

"The prototype itself is not currently suitable for operation in a close combat environment," SOCOM spokesman Navy Lt. Phillip Chitty told Task & Purpose at the time. "There is still no intent to field the TALOS Mk 5 combat suit prototype."

Despite the lack of an integrated suit, some of TALOS' subsystems may live on as parts of various programs of record across the U.S. armed forces: SOCOM has identified 10 subsystems for "further maturation and testing," include lightweight polyethylene armor, a small-arms stabilization system commonly referred to as a "third arm," and various augmented reality concepts.

"TALOS was more than just the 'Iron Man' powered armor; it was a number of subsystems," Navy Lieutenant Cmdr. Tim Hawkins, a SOCOM spokesman, told Task & Purpose. "Some those subsystems borne out of TALOS — where the technology was mature enough, where the technology was able to meet SOF requirements, and where there is a clear acquisition and technical development path forward — are moving forward, and SOCOM is looking to incorporate those into programs of record."

"We're talking about initially fielding them to SOF, but that's not to say that some of the efforts that came out of TALOS couldn't see fielding to the various services," he added.

Revision Military's prototype Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit (TALOS) suit, which helped inspire the 'Iron Man suit' moniker for the experimental powered exoskeleton(Courtesy of Revision Military)

According to Hawkins, the 10 subsystems that SOCOM has identified for further testing include:

  • Lightweight Polyethylene (PE) Armor for Extremity Protection: According to Hawkins, this TALOS-inspired body armor offers protection from small-arms fire over 44 percent of the body compared to the 19 percent of standard infantry body armor. Not only does this include increased protection for an operator's shoulders, obliques, forearms, and groin, Hawkins said, but the new armor weighs 25 percent, or roughly three pounds, less than standard protective gear.
  • Lightweight PE Ballistic Shield Product Improvement: An arm-mounted ballistic shield fabricated from the same lightweight polyethylene used in the TALOS-inspired new body armor
  • Lightweight Polyethylene Rifle Helmet and Improved Night Vision Goggle (NVG) Mount: According to Hawkins, the helmet doesn't just offer increased protection against small arms, but the new night vision mount positioning reduces neck strain and interference with an operator's rifle scope.
  • 'Augmented Operator': This is SOCOM's name for the high-tech leg braces that are designed to support the ankles and knees, reducing the strain on the body while marching or operating in mountainous terrain for long periods of time. It's "not a full body suit," as Hawkins emphasized, but the end result of whittling the TALOS armor concept down to a leg-mounted exoskeleton.
  • Small Arms Stabilization Platform/Counter Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Weapon System: This is SOCOM's version of the Army's "third arm," a system Hawkins described as a "lightweight modular gyro-stabilization device designed to enable the operator to engage with more accuracy." While Hawkins couldn't specify whether that counter-UAS system consisted of a kinetic or directed energy weapon, he stated that the system "has a multirole capability against air-ground-and maritime threats," so far that the device would ideally allow the operator to detect, track, target, and classify incoming targets.
  • Virtual Reality Tactical Assault Kit (VTAK): A pre-operation planning tool designed to "better visualize, plan, or rehearse actions on an objective to better conduct mission panning and objective walkthrough," as Hawkins described it.
  • Heads Up Display/Augmented Reality Architecture: This is a continuation of SOCOM's efforts to develop a heads-up display, Hawkins said. According to a recent interview with former JATF-TALOS chief engineer Col. Alex MacCalman in Special Operations Outlook, the concept of combining night vision, integrating sensors, and augmented reality into a single unified system "paved the way" for the documents that informed the Army's new Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IAVS).
  • Enhanced Image Intensification (I2) Tube Performance: Designed to increase the resolution of SOCOM's night vision goggles.
  • Medium Range Fused Weapon Sight Long Wave Infrared/Near Infrared (LWIR/NIR): An improved weapons sight designed to match the performance of SOCOM's existing SOF-fielded night vision goggles.
  • Power Management: "It's about establishing a better power management architecture," Hawkins said. After all, all of these new devices require hefty amounts of power, and SOCOM is working on a power source that can better sustain each system in a unique operator environment.

As Task & Purpose previously reported, the TALOS prototype lacked the suit-wide interconnectivity that defines the passively-worn powered armor of fiction. Indeed, the new TALOS successor program, dubbed the 'Hyper-Enabled Operator' concept (or HEO), is explicitly focused on information management to enhance situational awareness rather than physical armor.

HEO "is more focused on the cognitive domain," Hawkins told Task & Purpose. "It's a follow-on to TALOS that seeks to give operators tools to make better decisions faster through human machine interface, data (accessing relevant raw data), various applications (applying that raw data using algorithms and computing hardware), and improved communications."

"The TALOS concept came at a time when [SOCOM] and the Pentagon were focused on countering violent extremist organizations, but we're now more focused on great power competition," Hawkins added, citing the 2018 National Defense Strategy that realigned the DoD's view of long-term strategic threats, and put renewed attention on emerging threats from countries with conventional militaries like China, Russia and North Korea.

"The Iron Man suit is useful for kicking down doors in close-combat environments like those counter-VEO operations, but the focus on the HEO concept is more 'phase zero' ... you're not kicking in doors, you're shaping the combat environment using information from partners and allies so you don't need to be wrapped in heavy armor in the first place."

Nothing says joint force battle management like a ride-sharing app. (Task & Purpose photo illustration)

The Air Force's top general says one of the designers of the ride-sharing app Uber is helping the branch build a new data-sharing network that the Air Force hopes will help service branches work together to detect and destroy targets.

The network, which the Air Force is calling the advanced battle management system (ABMS), would function a bit like the artificial intelligence construct Cortana from Halo, who identifies enemy ships and the nearest assets to destroy them at machine speed, so all the fleshy humans need to do is give a nod of approval before resuming their pipe-smoking.

Read More
The newly painted F-15 Eagle flagship, dubbed the Heritage Jet, was painted to honor 1st Lt. David Kingsley, the namesake for Kingsley Field, and his ultimate sacrifice. (U.S. Air National Guard/Senior Master Sgt. Jennifer Shirar)

An F-15C Eagle is sporting a badass World War II-era paint job in honor of a fallen bomber pilot who gave everything to ensure his men survived a deadly battle.

Read More
The wreckage of a U.S. Air Force E-11A Battlefield Airborne Communications Node aircraft is seen after a crash in Deh Yak district of Ghazni province, Afghanistan on January 27, 2020 (Reuters photo)

A U.S. E-11A Battlefield Airborne Communications Node aircraft crashed on Monday on Afghanistan, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein has confirmed.

Read More
In this June 7, 2009 file photo Los Angeles Lakers guard Kobe Bryant (24) points to a player behind him after making a basket in the closing seconds against the Orlando Magic in Game 2 of the NBA basketball finals in Los Angeles. Bryant, the 18-time NBA All-Star who won five championships and became one of the greatest basketball players of his generation during a 20-year career with the Los Angeles Lakers, died in a helicopter crash Sunday, Jan. 26, 2020. He was 41. (Associated Press/Mark J. Terrill)

Beloved basketball legend Kobe Bryant, his daughter, and seven other people were killed in a helicopter crash in Calabasas, California on Sunday. Two days earlier, Army Spc. Antonio I. Moore was killed during a vehicle rollover accident while conducting route clearing operations in Syria.

Which one more deserves your grief and mourning? According to Maj. Gen. John R. Evans, commander of the U.S. Army Cadet Command, you only have enough energy for one.

Read More
Jessica Purcell of St. Petersburg, a captain in the Army Reserve, was pregnant with son Jameson when she was told at a MacDill Air Force Base clinic not to worry about lumps under her arm. She now is diagnosed stage 4 cancer. Jameson is 10 months old. (Tampa Bay Times/Scott Keeler via Tribune News Service)

Jessica Purcell, a captain in the U.S. Army Reserve, was pregnant with her first child when she noticed a swollen lymph node in her left underarm.

Health-care providers at a MacDill Air Force Base clinic told her it was likely an infection or something related to pregnancy hormones. The following year they determined the issue had resolved itself.

It hadn't. A doctor off base found a large mass in her underarm and gave her a shocking diagnosis: stage 2 breast cancer.

Purcell was pregnant again. Her daughter had just turned 1. She was 35. And she had no right to sue for malpractice.

A 1950 Supreme Court ruling known as the Feres doctrine prohibits military members like Purcell from filing a lawsuit against the federal government for any injuries suffered while on active duty. That includes injury in combat, but also rape and medical malpractice, such as missing a cancer diagnosis.

Thanks in part to Tampa lawyer Natalie Khawam, a provision in this year's national defense budget allows those in active duty to file medical malpractice claims against the government for the first time since the Feres case.

With the Department of Defense overseeing the new claims process, the question now is how fairly and timely complaints will be judged. And whether, in the long run, this new move will help growing efforts to overturn the ruling and allow active duty members to sue like everyone else.

Read More