This Is Why The Pentagon Could Never Build A Death Star


Say what you will about Darth Vader, but he knew how to run a modernization program. When he was put in charge of the Death Star Joint Program Office, that battle station reached initial operating capability on time – a feat the Pentagon seems unable to replicate many years later.

The Defense Department could learn a lot from Vader. For example, is there any mention in the “Star Wars” trilogy of the second Death Star being over budget? Of course not. You best believe that the Sith bad-ass would have locked the prime contractor into a fixed-price contract that included a clause such as, “JPO reserves the right to force choke your CEO every time the software doesn’t work as advertised.”

Indeed, the Empire’s stunning success in The Return of the Jedi led your humble Pentagon correspondent to wonder how the Defense Department would fare should it decide to build a Death Star of its own. From this reporter’s limited experience covering military acquisition and modernization efforts, here is what a Pentagon Death Star program might look like.

If the Army were in charge of building a Death Star, you can be guaranteed that the program would be cancelled. The service’s last modernization successes were decades ago: The Abrams tank, Bradley Fighting Vehicle, Black Hawk transport helicopter, Apache attack helicopter, and Patriot missile defense system – the Bradley is nearing the end of its life cycle so the Army is working to replace it.

Since then, Congress has killed nearly all of the Army’s high tech weapons programs including the Crusader self-propelled howitzer, the Comanche helicopter, and Future Combat Systems – which urinated away a Niagara Falls of cash.

The Army is so ass-backwards on developing new stuff that the service’s master plan is to lure highly paid entrepreneurs from Silicon Valley to Austin, Texas, to work for Futures Command. One can imagine the Army’s recruiting campaign for Project Death Star: “Are you ready to work on Hoth?!?”

No, a project that could potentially bankrupt the United States would have to be helmed by the two services Congress loves rewarding for failure: The Air Force and Navy.

Let’s start with the Navy, which proved that when you put ALL of your whiz-bang new technology into one ship – namely the Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier – not a single goddamn thing will works at sea.

The reason the Navy gets away with building vessels that don’t work is that it single-handedly keeps U.S. shipbuilders solvent – and that makes Congress very happy. Former Navy Secretary Ray Mabus will be remembered for two things: Giving a lot of work to shipbuilders in Mississippi, where he was governor; and his jihad against enlisted ratings, which was ultimately defeated.

This allows the Navy to keep building Littoral Combat Ships, which have so little protection that in a war against Russia or China, they might sink slowly enough to let some of the crew abandon ship in time. 

Were the Navy to lead Project Death Star, it would shrug off concerns about the exposed thermal exhaust port leading straight to the main reactor by saying the Death Star was too important to the Defense Department Industrial Base Sector to cancel. After all, The Pentagon is primarily a jobs program with a $700 billion budget, and this means defense industry has learned that the key to keeping big weapons systems alive when they bleed money and run decades behind schedule is to spread the work out into all 50 states.

You can bet your life that a piece of the Death Star would be made in each Congressional district, because it doesn’t matter if they are Republicans or Democrats: Lawmakers love defense jobs. (Just ask Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., if he has any qualms about the exploding costs of the Marine Corps’ CH-53K King Stallion helicopter, which is built in his home state.)

Given all of the above, it is likely that the Pentagon’s Death Star would be a lot like the F-35 – years behind schedule, way more expensive than originally expected, and impervious to any criticism.

Prime contractor Lockheed Martin seems in no hurry to fix a glitch in the F-35C’s helmet that prevents Navy pilots from seeing a ship’s flight deck at night. The Marine Corps’ F-35B has a faulty bracket that caused one plane to catch fire in flight. And all of the services’ F-35s were recently grounded after a fuel line issue contributed to an F-35B crash.

Just like the F-35, it would take decades to work out all of the Death Star’s software glitches and design flaws. But given how long it takes for the Pentagon to field new weapons systems, China would likely steal the Defense Department’s Death Star plans and build their own in half the time, said Rachel Zissimos, a defense expert at the Heritage Foundation think tank in Washington, D.C.

Moreover, the estimated $858 quadrillion required to build a U.S. Death Star probably does not include all of the project’s costs, especially considering the “unknowns” involved with building such a battle station, Zissimos told Task & Purpose.

“I think delays in initial operational capability for the death ray would yield a Death Star with a functional tractor beam but no combat function and it would end up as high powered vacuum repurposed for the cleanup of space junk,” she said.

SEE ALSO: Former Pentagon Official Says There’s ‘Very Compelling Evidence’ That Aliens Are Among Us


Jeff Schogol covers the Pentagon for Task & Purpose. He has covered the military for 13 years and embedded with U.S. troops in Iraq and Haiti. Prior to joining T&P;, he covered the Marine Corps and Air Force at Military Times. Comments or thoughts to share? Send them to Jeff Schogol via email at or direct message @JeffSchogol on Twitter.

An Austrian Jagdkommando K9 unit conducts training (Austrian Armed Forces photo)

An Austrian soldier was apparently killed by two military working dogs that he was charged with feeding, the Austrian Ministry of Defense announced on Thursday.

Read More Show Less

Conflict photographer Lynsey Addario has seen a hell of a lot of combat over the past twenty years. She patrolled Afghanistan's Helmand Province with the Marines, accompanied the Army on night raids in Baghdad, took artillery fire with rebel fighters in Libya, and has taken photos in countless other wars and humanitarian disasters around the world.

Along the way, Addario captured images of plenty of women serving with pride in uniform, not only in the U.S. armed forces, but also on the battlefields of Syria, Colombia, South Sudan and Israel. Her photographs are the subject of a new article in the November 2019 special issue of National Geographic, "Women: A Century of Change," the magazine's first-ever edition written and photographed exclusively by women.

The photos showcase the wide range of goals and ideals for which these women took up arms. Addario's work includes captivating vignettes of a seasoned guerrilla fighter in the jungles of Colombia; a team of Israeli military police patrolling the streets of Jerusalem; and a unit of Kurdish women guarding ISIS refugees in Syria. Some fight to prove themselves, others seek to ignite social change in their home country, and others do it to liberate other women from the grip of ISIS.

Addario visited several active war zones for the piece, but she found herself shaken by something much closer to home: the Marine Corps Recruit Depot at Parris Island, South Carolina.

Addario discussed her visit to boot camp and her other travels in an interview with Task & Purpose, which has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

Read More Show Less

My brother earned the Medal of Honor for saving countless lives — but only after he was left for dead

"As I learned while researching a book about John, the SEAL ground commander, Cmdr. Tim Szymanski, had stupidly and with great hubris insisted on insertion being that night."


Editor's Note: The following is an op-ed. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Task & Purpose.

Air Force Master Sgt. John "Chappy" Chapman is my brother. As one of an elite group, Air Force Combat Control — the deadliest and most badass band of brothers to walk a battlefield — John gave his life on March 4, 2002 for brothers he never knew.

They were the brave men who comprised a Quick Reaction Force (QRF) that had been called in to rescue the SEAL Team 6 team (Mako-30) with whom he had been embedded, which left him behind on Takur Ghar, a desolate mountain in Afghanistan that topped out at over 10,000 feet.

As I learned while researching a book about John, the SEAL ground commander, Cmdr. Tim Szymanski, had stupidly and with great hubris insisted on insertion being that night. After many delays, the mission should and could have been pushed one day, but Szymanski ordered the team to proceed as planned, and Britt "Slab" Slabinski, John's team leader, fell into step after another SEAL team refused the mission.

But the "plan" went even more south when they made the rookie move to insert directly atop the mountain — right into the hands of the bad guys they knew were there.

Read More Show Less
Photo: ABC News/screenshot

Federal court judge Reggie Walton in Washington D.C. has ruled Hoda Muthana, a young woman who left her family in Hoover, Alabama, to join ISIS, is not a U.S. citizen, her attorneys told Thursday.

The ruling means the government does not recognize her a citizen of the United States, even though she was born in the U.S.

Read More Show Less

Editor's Note: This article by Gina Harkins originally appeared on, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, Va. -- The Marine Corps could train as many as eight co-ed companies at boot camp each year, and the general overseeing the effort is hitting back against those complaining that the move is lowering training standards.

"Get over it," Maj. Gen. William Mullen, the head of Training and Education Command told on Thursday. "We're still making Marines like we used to. That has not changed."

Mullen, a career infantry officer who has led troops in combat — including in Fallujah, Iraq — said Marines have likely been complaining about falling standards since 1775.

"I'm assuming that the second Marine walking into Tun Tavern was like 'You know ... our standards have gone down. They're just not the same as it they used to be,'" Mullen said, referring to the service's famous birthplace. "That has always been going on in the history of the Marine Corps."

Read More Show Less