The Pentagon’s troop deployment denials means nothing when the White House screams ‘fake news’ all the time

Pentagon Run-Down

The Pentagon has a credibility problem that is the result of the White House's scorched earth policy against any criticism. As a result, all statements from senior leaders are suspect.

We're beyond the point of defense officials being unable to say for certain whether a dog is a good boy or girl. Now we're at the point where the Pentagon has spent three days trying to knock down a Wall Street Journal story about possible deployments to the Middle East, and they've failed to persuade either the press or Congress.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the United States was considering deploying up to 14,000 troops to the Middle East to thwart any potential Iranian attacks. The story made clear that President Trump could ultimately decide to send a smaller number of service members, but defense officials have become fixated on the number 14,000 as if it were the only option on the table.


"As the department has stated repeatedly, we were never discussing or considering sending 14,000 additional troops to the Middle East," Defense Secretary Mark Esper said in a statement on Friday. "Reports of this are flat out wrong. DOD will always stand ready to respond to future actions by our adversaries if and when they arise, but the Pentagon is not considering sending 14,000 troops to CENTCOM. This report is false."

In normal times, that would end any debate about the story's accuracy, but we live in the Bizarro universe where disinformation is the coin of the realm.

That's because the White House has perfected the strategy of claiming that every news story it does not like is an outright lie. Trump attacked the story's credibility on Thursday, tweeting, "The story today that we are sending 12,000 troops to Saudi Arabia is false or, to put it more accurately, Fake News!"

First of all, this reporter loathes the phrase "fake news," which is the first refuge of the rogues and scoundrels known as elected officials. The president has successfully called "fake news" countless times during his tenure, but he has also created an environment where every denial must be greeted with a degree of skepticism. Indeed, when former Navy Secretary Richard Spencer disputed a New York Times report that he had threatened to resign, Esper later said Spencer had in fact indicated he would step down. Womp womp.

Before we go any further, I need to make clear that I respect both Esper and Army Gen. Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, both of whom have made serious efforts to be more open with the media. They are well served by a number of overworked public affairs officers who work around the clock to provide maximum information to reporters with minimal delay. One of those professionals is Pentagon spokeswoman Alyssa Farah, who was the first Pentagon official to comment on the reported planning for troop deployments.

But – fairly or unfairly – they are painted with the same brush as the White House. So when Farah initially tweeted on Wednesday that the Wall Street Journal story was wrong, the Pentagon's word was simply not enough for two Republican lawmakers who skewered Undersecretary of Defense for Policy John Rood the next day.

When Rood appeared to confirm that the Pentagon was considering deploying up to 14,000 troops to the Middle East, Sen. Joshua Hawley (R-Mo.) accused Farah of misspeaking and demanded a public explanation from Esper.

The Pentagon has consistently objected to the 14,000 figure in the Wall Street Journal story. Other media outlets have reported that the number of troops deployed could be between 5,000 and 7,000.

However, your friend and humble narrator was in this very building for the Iraq and Afghanistan surges and in both cases the actual number of troops deployed was much higher than the figure originally announced.

As old hares know, there's a long tail behind each tooth, so the pending Middle East deployment will end up including numerous supporting elements, which the Pentagon may or may not reveal.

It's entirely possible the Defense Department could announce the president has authorized deploying 7,000 troops, and then ships, logisticians, or aviation units could be sent later, bumping up the total number of service members involved to 14,000.

But on a personal note, your friend and humble narrator knows both reporters who wrote the Wall Street Journal story. They are seasoned professionals and I trust them. You should too.

Not getting the Pentagon Run-Down? Sign up here!

Jeff Schogol covers the Pentagon for Task & Purpose. He has covered the military for 14 years and embedded with U.S. troops in Iraq and Haiti. Prior to joining T&P, he covered the Marine Corps and Air Force at Military Times. Comments or thoughts to share? Send them to Jeff Schogol via email at schogol@taskandpurpose.com or direct message @JeffSchogol on Twitter.

Soldiers from the 1-118th Field Artillery Regiment of the 48th Infantry Brigade Combat Team fire an M777 Howitzer during a fire mission in Southern Afghanistan, June 10th, 2019. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Jordan Trent)

Once again, the United States and the Taliban are apparently close to striking a peace deal. Such a peace agreement has been rumored to be in the works longer than the latest "Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure" sequel. (The difference is Keanu Reeves has fewer f**ks to give than U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad.)

Both sides appeared to be close to reaching an agreement in September until the Taliban took credit for an attack that killed Army Sgt. 1st Class Elis A. Barreto Ortiz, of the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division. That prompted President Donald Trump to angrily cancel a planned summit with the Taliban that had been scheduled to take place at Camp David, Maryland, on Sept. 8.

Now Taliban spokesman Suhail Shaheen has told a Pakistani newspaper that he is "optimistic" that the Taliban could reach an agreement with U.S. negotiators by the end of January.

Read More
Audie Murphy (U.S. Army photo)

Editor's note: a version of this post first appeared in 2018

On January 26, 1945, the most decorated U.S. service member of World War II earned his legacy in a fiery fashion.

Read More
A Purple Heart (DoD photo)

Florida's two senators are pushing the Defense Department to award Purple Hearts to the U.S. service members wounded in the December shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola.

Read More
Ships from Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 23 transit the Pacific Ocean Jan. 22, 2020. DESRON 23, part of the Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group, is on a scheduled deployment to the Indo-Pacific. (U.S. Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Erick A. Parsons)

Editor's Note: This article by Gina Harkins originally appeared on Military.com, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

The Navy and Marine Corps need to be a bit more short-sighted when assessing how many ships they need, the acting Navy secretary said this week.

The Navy Department is in the middle of a new force-structure review, which could change the number and types of ships the sea services say they'll need to fight future conflicts. But instead of trying to project what they will need three decades out, which has been the case in past assessments, acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly said the services will take a shorter view.

"I don't know what the threat's going to be 30 years from now, but if we're building a force structure for 30 years from now, I would suggest we're probably not building the right one," he said Friday at a National Defense Industrial Association event.

The Navy completed its last force-structure assessment in 2016. That 30-year plan called for a 355-ship fleet.

Read More
Master-at-Arms 3rd Class Oscar Temores and his family. (GoFundMe)

When Oscar Jesus Temores showed up to work at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story each day, his colleagues in base security knew they were in for a treat.

Temores was a master-at-arms who loved his job and cracking corny jokes.

"He just he just had that personality that you can go up to him and talk to him about anything. It was goofy and weird, and he always had jokes," said Petty Officer 3rd Class Derek Lopez, a fellow base patrolman. "Sometimes he'd make you cry from laughter and other times you'd just want to cringe because of how dumb his joke was. But that's what made him more approachable and easy to be around."

That ability to make others laugh and put people at ease is just one of the ways Temores is remembered by his colleagues. It has been seven weeks since the 23-year-old married father of one was killed when a civilian intruder crashed his pickup truck into Temores' vehicle at Fort Story.

Read More