Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
The F-35 is an overpriced lemon that doesn’t work
Your friend and humble narrator is getting pretty sick and tired of continuing problems with the F-35, the super-expensive wonder jet that might be ready for a war against China or Russia by the turn of the millennium.
Bloomberg's Tony Capaccio recently reported that the 25mm gun on the Air Force's F-35 variant STILL doesn't f**king work. This is not a new problem. It's one of the many issues that has plagued the F-35 program for years – and the defense industry seems in no rush to get things fixed.
In fact, both reports from 2018 and 2019 by Defense Department research, development, test, and evaluation describe the accuracy of the F-35A's gun as "unacceptable."
Both reports use the exact same words to describe the problem: "Investigations into the gun mounts of the F-35A revealed misalignments that result in muzzle alignment errors. As a result, the true alignment of each F-35A gun is not known, so the program is considering options to re-boresight and correct gun alignments."
In other words, the Pentagon just copied and pasted the same wording into its latest report.
Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein did not appear overly concerned about problems with the F-35A's guns when asked about it in February 2019.
"Given what we've built the F-35 to do, I'm not sure that the gun is going to be the first place I would focus on," Goldfein said while speaking at the liberal Brookings Institution think tank in Washington, D.C. "When we talk about fifth generation [fighters], stealth is actually only a small part of that. When we talk about 5th generation, it's about information fusion and being able to have displayed for you information that was not available."
Another way of putting that is the F-35's gun is not the most important thing that needs to be unf**ked.
The Pentagon recently abandoned efforts to fix the F-35's long-plagued information technology backbone, known as ALIS (Autonomic Logistics Information System). Now Prime contractor Lockheed Martin will replace ALIS with a new system: Operational Data Integrated Network, or ODIN – the Pentagon's latest tribute to the Norse god of war.
The 2019 research, development, test, and evaluation report described ALIS as, "Inefficient and cumbersome to use, still requires the use of numerous workarounds, retains problems with data accuracy and integrity, and requires excessive time from support personnel."
"As a result, it does not efficiently enable sortie generation and aircraft availability as intended," the report says.
Translation: The damn thing either doesn't work or provides misleading data so often that F-35s can't fly.
For years, ALIS has been the source of many, many ulcers for F-35 maintainers. In fact, then-Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson joked in February 2019, "I can guarantee that no Air Force maintainer will ever name their daughter Alice."
Your friendly Pentagon correspondent is not technically savvy enough to explain why ALIS never worked right. Suffice to say the U.S. government has never been good when it comes to information technology. (Remember the disastrous debut of Healthcare.gov?)
If that weren't enough, Valerie Insinna of Defense News – one of this reporter's favorite humans – revealed in June that the F-35 continues to suffer from 13 serious flaws including – I kid you not – the plane's stealth coating peels off at times.
Right now, you might be saying something like: How is this different from every other Charlie Foxtrot the Pentagon has pissed away money on?
The big difference is the F-35 has cost airmen their careers. When sequestration hit during President Barack Obama's second term, the Air Force decided to shed thousands of people in order to have enough money to buy their precious F-35s.
Among some Air Force circles, the time was known as the "Hunger Games." The Air Force got rid of so many maintainers that it ended up not having enough airmen to keep planes flying.
While the military as a whole has had some time to catch its breath over the past few years, the Pentagon could face more budget cuts depending on the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. Once again, the Air Force may have to sacrifice personnel for a plane that doesn't work – and won't be fully ready anytime soon.
It is clear that defense industry is totally incompetent or deliberately slow rolling fixes to gouge taxpayers. Perhaps it's both. For now, let's all just pray that the United States isn't attacked by Russia or China until the F-35 is ready, in 2049.
Not getting the Pentagon Run-Down? Sign up here!
Jeff Schogol covers the Pentagon for Task & Purpose. He has covered the military for 14 years and embedded with U.S. troops in Iraq and Haiti. Prior to joining T&P, he covered the Marine Corps and Air Force at Military Times. Comments or thoughts to share? Send them to Jeff Schogol via email at email@example.com or direct message @JeffSchogol on Twitter.
Though the Army has yet to actually set an official recruiting goal for this year, leaders are confident they're going to bring in more soldiers than last year.
Maj. Gen. Frank Muth, head of Army Recruiting Command, told reporters on Wednesday that the Army was currently 2,226 contracts ahead of where it was in 2019.
"I will just tell you that this time last year we were in the red, and now we're in the green which is — the momentum's there and we see it continuing throughout the end of the year," Muth said, adding that the service hit recruiting numbers in February that haven't been hit during that month since 2014.
Editor's Note: The following is an op-ed. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Task & Purpose.
We are women veterans who have served in the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps. Our service – as aviators, ship drivers, intelligence analysts, engineers, professors, and diplomats — spans decades. We have served in times of peace and war, separated from our families and loved ones. We are proud of our accomplishments, particularly as many were earned while immersed in a military culture that often ignores and demeans women's contributions. We are veterans.
Yet we recognize that as we grew as leaders over time, we often failed to challenge or even question this culture. It took decades for us to recognize that our individual successes came despite this culture and the damage it caused us and the women who follow in our footsteps. The easier course has always been to tolerate insulting, discriminatory, and harmful behavior toward women veterans and service members and to cling to the idea that 'a few bad apples' do not reflect the attitudes of the whole.
Recent allegations that Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert Wilkie allegedly sought to intentionally discredit a female veteran who reported a sexual assault at a VA medical center allow no such pretense.
KABUL/WASHINGTON/PESHAWAR, Pakistan (Reuters) - The United States and the Taliban will sign an agreement on Feb. 29 at the end of a week long period of violence reduction in Afghanistan, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the Taliban said on Friday.
Active-duty service members, Reservists and National Guard members often serve side-by-side performing highly skilled and dangerous jobs, such as parachuting, explosives demolition and flight deck operations.
Reservists and Guard members are required to undergo the same training as specialized active-duty troops, and they face the same risks. Yet the extra incentive pay they receive for their work — called hazardous duty incentive pay — is merely a fraction of what their active-duty counterparts receive for performing the same job.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers, led by U.S. Rep. Andy Kim, D-3 of Moorestown, are partnering on legislation to correct the inequity. Known as the Guard and Reserve Hazard Duty Pay Equity Act, the bill seeks to standardize payment of hazardous duty incentive pay for all members of the armed services, including Reserve and National Guard components.
Another Marine was hit with jail time and a bad-conduct discharge in connection with a slew of arrests made last summer over suspicions that members of a California-based infantry battalion were transporting people who'd crossed into the U.S. illegally.