4 Things Veterans Hate That War Movies Get Wrong

popular
A screenshot from the 2000 movie Rules of Engagement, where Samuel L. Jackson played a Marine colonel who desperately needed to visit the base barbershop.
Screenshot via YouTube

War and the military have long been favorite subjects for Hollywood movie producers. Well-done war movies can really capture the spirit and complexities of warfare and military service (think Saving Private Ryan).


But the military is complex and nuanced and there are a million tiny details. When movie producers --- many of whom have no military background --- attempt to capture that nuance, it often results in mistakes that are really obvious to people in the military.

The mistakes are so obvious and glaring, there’s even a popular myth that movie studios are required by law to get certain aspects of the uniform wrong in order to prevent people from accurately impersonating members of the military. Our friends at Ranger Up recently wrote a good piece dispelling that dumb theory.

Related: 10 movie quotes you always wanted to say in combat »

Regardless, vets and service members get frustrated when they go to see their livelihoods on the silver screen and the movie just gets it completely wrong. A recent discussion thread on RallyPoint even asked, “What ONE incorrectly depicted thing pisses you off most about military movies?”

RallyPoint is a great social networking platform for the military community. We’ve picked out some of the best answers to demonstrate what really grinds the gears of vets when movies screw it up.

1. Skylining. In war movies, it’s pretty common to have that dramatic long shot of soldiers silhouetted among the ridgeline, walking a patrol. This is a huge tactical faux-pas, as it would make the patrol very obvious to anyone merely looking at the skyline.

“Skyline” is even a military slang term for making something obvious. And (shameless plug) the name of Task & Purpose’s news aggregator, where we point out the top stories you need to know.

2. Radio chatter. Few things seem more quintessentially military than ending a communication over the radio with “over.” But real military radio etiquette is a matter of official protocol, not something you can fake.

I remember playing Army as a kid and doing it with my walkie talkies. Unfortunately, Hollywood does about as good of a job getting it right as I did when I ran around my neighborhood with a cap gun.

Perhaps the best example is “over and out,” a terrible conflation of two different real terms in voice procedure, and they’re mutually exclusive from one another.

“Over” means that the person has finished transmitting and is awaiting a response, whereas “out” means that a person has finished his transmission and no response is necessary, so the two words would never appear in a single transmission together.

3. Endless ammo and hand grenades that level buildings. One of the most enticing parts of seeing a war movie is the awesome action scenes. But for many combat veterans, it pains them to see an actor roll a fragmentation grenade into a house, only to see a fireball the size of a city block take out the building.

And firefights involving M4 carbines on full automatic that never run out of ammunition don’t help the cause. But hey, Michael Bay made a career out of that, right?

To be fair, this isn’t specific to war movies. Think of all the car chases have we seen end with the car hitting a dumpster, then explode into a blast of hellfire, and the dumpster explodes, too.

4. Getting the medals and uniform wrong. Dress uniforms are so precise and detailed that real service members occasionally get things wrong. What medals an actor wears in a movie makes little difference to the majority of the audience, but to the military and veterans community, it really sticks out.

Little details like tucking in your lapels on your Marine service alpha uniform, or huge things like wearing the wrong uniform for that respective branch, all together go a long way in distinguishing movies that seek to honor military service from those that are just cheap imitations of it (I’m looking at you, John Cena in The Marine).

The ability of movie studios to portray the uniform correctly is even legally protected, so if movie producers get it wrong, they have no excuse.

U.S. Code Title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, Chapter 45, S772 outlines proper wear and use of the U.S. military uniform. It reads: “While portraying a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps, an actor in a theatrical or motion-picture production may wear the uniform of that armed force if the portrayal does not tend to discredit that armed force.”

Check out the full discussion thread in RallyPoint here. What bothers you when you see it in movies? Let us know in the comments.

Chief Master Sgt. Jason Morehouse. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Editor's Note: This article by Oriana Pawlyk originally appeared onMilitary.com, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

The command chief of the 20th Fighter Wing at Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, was removed from his position last month after his chain of command received evidence he disrespected his subordinates.

Read More Show Less

Editor's Note: The following is an op-ed. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Task & Purpose.

The "suck it up and drive on" mentality permeated our years in the U.S. military and often led us to delay getting both physical and mental health care. As veterans, we now understand that engaging in effective care enables us not just to survive but to thrive. Crucially, the path to mental wellness, like any serious journey, isn't accomplished in a day — and just because you need additional or recurring mental health care doesn't mean your initial treatment failed.

Read More Show Less

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared on Radio Free Europe/Radio Free Liberty.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has called on the security alliance's allies to maintain and strengthen their "unity," saying the organization is "the only guarantor of European and transatlantic security."

Stoltenberg told reporters on November 19 that NATO "has only grown stronger over the last 70 years" despite "differences" among the allies on issues such as trade, climate, the Iran nuclear deal, and the situation in northeastern Syria.

He was speaking at the alliance's headquarters in Brussels on the eve of a NATO foreign ministers meeting aimed at finalizing preparations for next month's summit in London.

Read More Show Less
An aerial view of the Pentagon building in Washington, June 15, 2005. (Reuters/Jason Reed JIR/CN)

WASHINGTON — More than $35 million of the roughly $400 million in aid to Ukraine that President Donald Trump delayed, sparking the impeachment inquiry, has not been released to the country, according to a Pentagon spending document obtained by the Los Angeles Times.

Instead, the defense funding for Ukraine remains in U.S. accounts, according to the document. It's not clear why the money hasn't been released, and members of Congress are demanding answers.

Read More Show Less
Paul Szoldra/Task & Purpose

The admiral in charge of Navy special operators will decide whether to revoke the tridents for Eddie Gallagher and other SEALs involved in the Navy's failed attempt to prosecute Gallagher for murder, a defense official said Tuesday.

The New York Times' David Philipps first reported on Tuesday that the Navy could revoke the SEAL tridents for Gallagher as well as his former platoon commander Lt. Jacob Portier and two other SEALs: Lt. Cmdr. Robert Breisch and Lt. Thomas MacNeil.

The four SEALs will soon receive a letter that they have to appear before a board that will consider whether their tridents should be revoked, a defense official told Task & Purpose on condition of anonymity.

Read More Show Less