Get Task & Purpose in your inbox
Navy could take away tridents for Eddie Gallagher and other SEALs
The admiral in charge of Navy special operators will decide whether to revoke the tridents for Eddie Gallagher and other SEALs involved in the Navy's failed attempt to prosecute Gallagher for murder, a defense official said Tuesday.
The New York Times' David Philipps first reported on Tuesday that the Navy could revoke the SEAL tridents for Gallagher as well as his former platoon commander Lt. Jacob Portier and two other SEALs: Lt. Cmdr. Robert Breisch and Lt. Thomas MacNeil.
The four SEALs will soon receive a letter that they have to appear before a board that will consider whether their tridents should be revoked, a defense official told Task & Purpose on condition of anonymity.
A military jury found Gallagher not guilty of killing a wounded ISIS fighter in 2017, but the SEAL was convicted of posing for a picture with the dead man. Gallagher had been sentenced to be reduced one rank to first class petty officer, but President Donald Trump recently ordered that the Navy restore him to the rank and pay grade of chief petty officer.
At the board, the SEALs will be informed of the violations they are accused of and be given the opportunity to respond, the official said. The board members will make a recommendation for action that will go to Rear Adm. Collin Green, the head of Naval Special Warfare Command, who will make a final decision on the SEALs' tridents.
A spokeswoman for Naval Special Warfare Command declined to say what action Green might take.
"We have implemented the President's order to restore Chief Gallagher's paygrade," said Navy Capt. Tamara Lawrence. "Commander, Naval Special Warfare Command is responsible for the Naval Special Warfare Force. He remains focused on delivering a capable, ready, and lethal maritime special operations force in support of national security objectives, which includes assessing the suitability of any member of his force via administrative processes."
Gallagher's attorney Tim Parlatore said that although the Navy has not informed him that it intends to rescind his client's trident, he knows that is what will happen because media outlets are reporting it.
"They are even reporting that the secretary of the Navy and the chief of naval operations have given their blessing to do it," Parlatore told Task & Purpose on Tuesday evening.
Both Navy Secretary Richard Spencer and Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday support their commanders' ability to carry out their responsibilities, including Rear Adm. Green, representatives for Spencer and Gilday said on Tuesday.
Should the Navy go through with taking away Gallagher's trident, the Navy SEAL would file a lawsuit against the service in the court of federal claims, Parlatore said.
Trump could also overrule the Navy's decision and restore Gallagher's trident, Parlatore said.
"Even having this proceeding is a direct affront, an insult, to the president by Adm. Green," Parlatore said. "I don't want to speak for the president, but if I were sitting in the White House, not only would I restore [the trident], but I'd have Adm. Green arrested and court-martialed for insubordination."
The FBI is treating the recent shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, as a terrorist attack, several media outlets reported on Sunday.
"We work with the presumption that this was an act of terrorism," USA Today quoted FBI Agent Rachel Rojas as saying at a news conference.
WASHINGTON/SEOUL (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un risks losing "everything" if he resumes hostility and his country must denuclearize, after the North said it had carried out a "successful test of great significance."
"Kim Jong Un is too smart and has far too much to lose, everything actually, if he acts in a hostile way. He signed a strong Denuclearization Agreement with me in Singapore," Trump said on Twitter, referring to his first summit with Kim in Singapore in 2018.
"He does not want to void his special relationship with the President of the United States or interfere with the U.S. Presidential Election in November," he said.
The three sailors whose lives were cut short by a gunman at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, on Friday "showed exceptional heroism and bravery in the face of evil," said base commander Navy Capt. Tim Kinsella.
Ensign Joshua Kaleb Watson, Airman Mohammed Sameh Haitham, and Airman Apprentice Cameron Scott Walters were killed in the shooting, the Navy has announced.
The Pentagon’s troop deployment denials means nothing when the White House screams ‘fake news’ all the time
The Pentagon has a credibility problem that is the result of the White House's scorched earth policy against any criticism. As a result, all statements from senior leaders are suspect.
We're beyond the point of defense officials being unable to say for certain whether a dog is a good boy or girl. Now we're at the point where the Pentagon has spent three days trying to knock down a Wall Street Journal story about possible deployments to the Middle East, and they've failed to persuade either the press or Congress.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the United States was considering deploying up to 14,000 troops to the Middle East to thwart any potential Iranian attacks. The story made clear that President Trump could ultimately decide to send a smaller number of service members, but defense officials have become fixated on the number 14,000 as if it were the only option on the table.
This article originally appeared on Business Insider.
SIMI VALLEY, Calif. – Gen. David Berger, the US Marine Corps commandant, suggested the concerns surrounding a service members' use of questionable Chinese-owned apps like TikTok should be directed against the military's leadership, rather than the individual troops.
Speaking at the Reagan National Defense Forum in Simi Valley, California, on Saturday morning, Berger said the younger generation of troops had a "clearer view" of the technology "than most people give them credit for."
"That said, I'd give us a 'C-minus' or a 'D' in educating the force on the threat of even technology," Berger said. "Because they view it as two pieces of gear, 'I don't see what the big deal is.'"