The Air Force Is Preparing To Test A Laser Cannon On Its ‘Ultimate Battle Plane’

Gear
The newly created AC-130J Ghostrider awaits takeoff for its first official sortie Jan. 31 at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. The Air Force Special Operations Command MC-130J arrived at Eglin in January 2013 to begin the modification process for the AC-130J, whose primary mission is close air support, air interdiction and armed reconnaissance.
Photo via DoD

Ever since the Air Force announced the development of the AC-130J Ghostrider to replace older generations of Lockheed Martin’s reliable fixed-wing gunship, Air Force Special Operations Command just can’t seem to resist slapping more guns on the thing.


In 2015, AFSOC added a 105mm cannon — basically a fucking howitzer normally reserved for armored ground vehicles — to the rear of the vessel at the insistence of former chief Lt. Gen. Bradley Heithold, supplementing the AC-130’s current arsenal of AGM-176A Griffin missiles, GBU-30 bombs, and a pre-existing 30mm cannon — making the gunship the most heavily armed in the Pentagon’s arsenal.

"We've got a bomb truck with guns on it now," Heithold told Air Force Times in 2015, dubbing the Ghostrider "the ultimate battle plane."

While AFSOC only got its hands on its first AC-130J gunship in October 2016, flown from Hurlburt Field to Eglin Air Force Base in Florida to test out that brutal 105mm cannon, Air Force officials are most excited about the Ghostrider’s other big gun: a frickin’ laser beam.

A photo illustration of a laser-eqqipped AC-130 gunship in actionPhoto illustration via AFSOC/DoD

While the use of high-powered lasers to knock out enemy electronics and destroy infrastructure was always part of the mix in the Ghostrider's development, a new report from National Defense magazine says the “directed energy weapon” is “rapidly moving” from science fiction to practical integration with an aircraft at the MIT Lincoln Laboratory. AFSOC officials are amped. From National Defense:

Using a high-energy laser, he aims and shoots at an electrical transformer, the engine of a pick-up truck, communication equipment stacked near the compound’s front door, and a drone sitting in the courtyard.

“Without the slightest bang, whoosh, thump, explosion, or even aircraft engine hum, four key targets are permanently disabled. The enemy has no communications, no escape vehicle, no electrical power and no retaliatory” intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capability, said Lt. Gen. Brad Webb, commander of Air Force Special Operations Command, as he relayed the story.

“Minutes later, the team emerges from the compound, terrorist mastermind in hand. A successful raid,” he said.

“We’re no longer talking about bulky chemical lasers, but streamlined electrical lasers,” Webb told National Defense. “These pioneering scientists have honed the ability to combine smaller lasers into a finely-tuned, exquisite single laser. Beam control seems to no longer be an issue. Nor is the cooling technology needed … to keep the system operating.”

A U.S. Air Force AC-130U Spooky gunship soars into the night Feb. 27, 2017 at Hurlburt Field, Fla. The aircraft flew in support of Emerald Warrior, a U.S. Special Operations Command exercise where joint special operations forces train to engage threats across the spectrum of conflict.Photo via DoD

According to Air Force Times, Heithold initially proposed lasers as a countermeasure to enemy missiles, a defensive measure in place of the powerful 105mm cannon. But the idea eventually evolved into an offensive system capable of silently disabling enemy vehicles or infrastructure without firing a shot.

“The technology is ripe for doing this,” Heithold told the Air Force Association’s conference in September. “I’ve got the space, I’ve got the weight, and I’ve got the power.”

AFSOC hopes to see a combat operational AC-130J gunships by fiscal year 2018, with a fleet of 37 Ghostriders ready to bring the pain by 2020. But until then, AFSOC has a significant amount of testing to do: reducing vibrations to ensure a tight beam (!!!), integrating the weapons platform into an aircraft’s electrical systems, even just creating a “window” in the craft body from which a laser beam can actually shoot.

And beyond operational testing, funding challenges remain. Heithold, who left AFSOC in 2016, told National Defense that the Pentagon wants to invest $3.4 billion in directed-energy weapons across the entire DoD, and that the biggest roadblocks to a combat implementation might be the lack of a clear developmental roadmap (or, as usual, bickering).

But despite these potential obstacles, those who have seen the awesome power of the AC-130J Ghostrider are excited to see the gunship, bristling with firepower and futuristic weaponry, terrify enemies downrange sooner rather than later.

“Believe me,” Webb told National Defense, “this technology is quickly leaving the pages of science fiction.”

[embed][/embed]

"Just walk it off," is typically the go-to solution for a scrape, a light sprain, or some other superficial injury.

Read More Show Less

Syrians threw potatoes and yelled at United States armored vehicles on Monday as U.S. troops drove through the northeast border town of Qamishli, after Trump vowed to pull U.S. troops from Syria.

Read More Show Less

(Reuters) - In the summer of 2004, U.S. soldier Greg Walker drove to a checkpoint just outside of Baghdad's Green Zone with his Kurdish bodyguard, Azaz. When he stepped out of his SUV, three Iraqi guards turned him around at gunpoint.

As he walked back to the vehicle, he heard an AK-47 being racked and a hail of cursing in Arabic and Kurdish. He turned to see Azaz facing off with the Iraqis.

"Let us through or I'll kill you all," Walker recalled his Kurdish bodyguard telling the Iraqi soldiers, who he described as "terrified."

He thought to himself: "This is the kind of ally and friend I want."

Read More Show Less

The winner of an Army competition searching for innovative technology for troops would let soldiers see their enemies through walls.

Read More Show Less

The U.S. military has pulled about 2,000 troops from Afghanistan over the past year, the top U.S. and coalition military commander said Monday.

"As we work in Afghanistan with our partners, we're always looking to optimize the force," Army Gen. Austin Miller said at a news conference in Kabul. "Unbeknownst to the public, as part of our optimization … we reduced our authorized strength by 2,000 here."

"I'm confident that we have the right capabilities to: 1. Reach our objectives as well as continue train, advise, and assist throughout the country," Miller continued.

The New York Times was first to report that the U.S. military had reduced its troop strength in Afghanistan even though peace talks with the Taliban are on hiatus. The number of troops in the country has gone from about 15,000 to 13,000, a U.S. official told Task & Purpose on condition of anonymity.

Separately, the U.S. military is considering drawing down further to 8,600 troops in Afghanistan as part of a broader political agreement, Defense Secretary Mark Esper told reporters on Oct. 19.

"We've always said, that it'll be conditions based, but we're confident that we can go down to 8,600 without affecting our [counterterrorism] operations, if you will," Esper said while enroute to Afghanistan.

So far, no order has been given to draw down to 8,600 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, the U.S. official said.

After President Donald Trump cancelled peace talks with the Taliban, which had been expected to take place at Camp David around the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, the U.S. military has increased both air and ground attacks.

In September, U.S. military aircraft dropped more ordnance in Afghanistan than they have since October 2010, according to Air Force statistics.

However, the president has also repeatedly vowed to bring U.S. troops home from the post 9/11 wars. Most recently, he approved withdrawing most U.S. troops from Syria.

On Monday, Esper said the situations in Syria and Afghanistan are very different, so the Afghans and other U.S. allies "should not misinterpret our actions in the recent week or so with regard to Syria."