Bipartisan bill would nix federal taxes on military bonuses

The bill would amend federal tax codes and take away taxes paid on troops’ performance and enlistment bonuses.
U.S Airmen assigned to the 81st Security Forces Squadron along with members of the U.S. Navy stand in formation during the Police Week Retreat Ceremony on May 15, 2025 at Keesler Air Force Base. The retreat ceremony was one of several events held by the 81st Security Forces Squadron commemorating National Police Week. National Police Week was established in 1962 as a collaborative effort to honor America’s law enforcement community and pay special recognition to those law enforcement officers who lost their lives in the line of duty for the safety and protection of others. (U.S. Air Force photo by Jon Carter)
The BONUS Act would exempt service members’ enlistment, reenlistment, and performance bonuses from being taxed by the federal government. Air Force photo by Jonathan Carter.

A bipartisan House bill would remove federal taxes from military bonuses.

The bill, nicknamed the BONUS Act, would exempt servicemembers’ enlistment, reenlistment, and performance bonuses from being taxed by the federal government. Service members in combat zones already benefit from tax-free income during their deployments, but the proposed legislation would put more cash into military families’ pockets at home.

The bipartisan bill introduced this week is sponsored by Reps. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.) and Sanford Bishop (D-Ga.) who are co-chairs of the House Military Family Caucus. A similar bill was introduced by a Florida Republican last month, but the bipartisan bills generally have a better chance of passing, especially in the highly partisan House.

“Every day, members of our Armed Forces put their lives on the line to preserve our national security,” Kiggans said in a release. “The heroes who swear an oath to defend our way of life should not be punished at tax time for the bonuses they use to clothe, feed, and educate their spouses and children.”

The legislation would amend a section of the federal tax code and apply to any bonuses earned after Dec. 31, 2024.

A report released by the Pentagon in January found that junior enlisted troops bring home more pay than their civilian peers with similar work and education levels. However, experts have pointed to the tough recruiting environment and added stress of military service — frequent moves, deployments, and hazardous jobs — as a reason to consider what “competitive compensation” looks like for young troops.

Bishop, the bill’s co-sponsor, said in a release that removing taxes on military bonuses would be another way to retain troops. However, in the last month, the Army and Air Force have started reducing their enlistment incentives because of the high levels of retention. 

“One way we can thank these hard-working men and women and encourage talent to continue serving is by providing a small bonus or incentive pay,” Bishop said.

A Senate version of the bill is being sponsored by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who is the head Democrat on the Senate Veterans Affairs committee.

The latest on Task & Purpose

  • Army to eliminate 2 Security Force Assistance Brigades, reassign experienced soldiers
  • Why the Army’s new XM7 rifle reignited a debate over volume of fire
  • Air Force delay on separation and retirement orders isn’t ‘stop loss,’ defense official says
  • F-35’s close call over Yemen raises questions about how it’s used
  • An Army unit’s ‘extreme use of profanity’ was so bad, they made a rule about it
 

Task & Purpose Video

Each week on Tuesdays and Fridays our team will bring you analysis of military tech, tactics, and doctrine.

 
Patty Nieberg Avatar

Patty Nieberg

Senior Staff Writer

Patty is a senior staff writer for Task & Purpose. She’s reported on the military for five years, embedding with the National Guard during a hurricane and covering Guantanamo Bay legal proceedings for an alleged al Qaeda commander.