US relied on Microsoft Excel to track gross human rights violations in Afghanistan until 2017

Afghan children follow Marine advisors with Task Force Southwest (TFSW) during a patrol to 6th Sub District Headquarters in Bost Kalay, Afghanistan, March 17, 2018. (U.S. Marine Corps/Sgt. Sean J. Berry)

Officials did not consistently document human rights abuses committed by Afghan security forces during the first 15 years of the U.S.-led military campaign there, relying on a constellation of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets that were often lost or deleted, according to documents reviewed by Task & Purpose.

In November 2017, U.S. Forces-Afghanistan and NATO's Resolute Support announced that new reporting procedures and training for U.S. troops regarding alleged child sexual abuse by Afghan National Security and Defense Forces personnel following a grim Department of Defense Inspector General report that described "inconsistent DoD reporting procedures and an overall lack of unified guidance on reporting and record-keeping."

"We have implemented a new reporting system, we're ensuring that all soldiers are trained, and every American soldier knows what's right and wrong, and they know that if they see a violation they are to report it," then commander Army Gen. John Nicholson said during a video briefing at the time.

The resulting training slides for the new Resolute Support Incidents of Gross Violations of Human Rights Tracking System, or (R.I.G.H.T.S.), obtained by Task & Purpose through a Freedom Of Information Act request, shed light on those inconsistencies — namely the use of notoriously frustrating Excel spreadsheets — a particularly galling oversight given the United States' stated commitment to human rights in Afghanistan since the outset of the conflict there.

"These trackers are typically excel spreadsheets that are subject to version issues, being lost or misplaced during advisor hand over, or being deleted," the slides read.

A slide from the Resolute Support Incidents of Gross Violations of Human Rights Tracking System, or (R.I.G.H.T.S.), obtained by Task & Purpose through a Freedom Of Information Act request(Resolute Support via FOIA)

Both monitoring and enforcement were hindered by "[a] lack of compatibility among [Gross Violations of Human Rights] stakeholders." In response, the R.I.G.H.T.S. system was developed to create a "common, web-based database" accessible by both Afghan and international authorities.

The system was explicitly designed to satisfy Leahy Law requirements that prohibit military assistance for foreign allies facing credible allegations of gross human rights violations. But implementing a unified database feels like way too little, way too late: While a formal requirement to establish "concrete areas for implementation" to combat conflict-related sexual violence originated with a NATO Military Committee memorandum in June 2015, the scourge of child sexual abuse has been well known to Pentagon officials for years.

According to a declassified U.S. Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction (SIGAR) report detailed by VOA News, Afghan security forces were involved in 75 gross violations of human rights between 2010 and 2016. But those numbers are likely low: the SIGAR report noted that it wasn't until the New York Times detailed "rampant" abuse in September 2017 that U.S. military officials in Afghanistan "provided related training and issued clear guidance that personnel should report suspected child sexual assault."

The Times expose was damning. In 2012, Lance Cpl. Gregory Buckley was murdered, along with two fellow Marines, at the hands of "one of a large entourage of boys" who lived with an Afghan National Police commander with a reputation for child abuse at Forward Operating Base Delhi in Helmand Province. According to The Times, his murder came two weeks after he reportedly expressed concern over the police officer's "tea boys."

In 2011, the Army involuntarily discharged Sgt. 1st Class Charles Martland for severely beating an Afghan local police militia commander who allegedly "abducted a boy and kept him chained to his bed as a sex slave," the New York Times reported. Lawmakers pushed hard to reinstate Martland, who claimed he "felt that morally we could no longer stand by" while Afghan personnel continued "to commit atrocities" (he was reinstated in April 2016).

Given the culture of silence described by the New York Times and explicitly described in the 2017 DoD IG report, it's doubtful that a new reporting database would help effectively induce service members to actually report child sexual abuse by Afghan security forces in the first place. Indeed, the 2017 report found that U.S. personnel "may not have known to report allegations of child sexual abuse to their chains of command" in the first place.

"We did not identify any guidance or policy that expressly discouraged personnel from reporting incidents of child sexual abuse," the DoD IG report noted at the time. "However … DoD cultural-awareness training for U.S. personnel deploying to Afghanistan and two Human Terrain System Reports identified child sexual abuse as a culturally accepted practice in Afghanistan.

Resolute Support declined to comment.

Gregory Flynn contributed reporting.

SEE ALSO: The DoD Has Barely Made A Dent In Afghan Security Forces' Child Sex Abuse Problem

Editor's Note: The following is an op-ed. The opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Task & Purpose.

The "suck it up and drive on" mentality permeated our years in the U.S. military and often led us to delay getting both physical and mental health care. As veterans, we now understand that engaging in effective care enables us not just to survive but to thrive. Crucially, the path to mental wellness, like any serious journey, isn't accomplished in a day — and just because you need additional or recurring mental health care doesn't mean your initial treatment failed.

Read More Show Less

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared on Radio Free Europe/Radio Free Liberty.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has called on the security alliance's allies to maintain and strengthen their "unity," saying the organization is "the only guarantor of European and transatlantic security."

Stoltenberg told reporters on November 19 that NATO "has only grown stronger over the last 70 years" despite "differences" among the allies on issues such as trade, climate, the Iran nuclear deal, and the situation in northeastern Syria.

He was speaking at the alliance's headquarters in Brussels on the eve of a NATO foreign ministers meeting aimed at finalizing preparations for next month's summit in London.

Read More Show Less
An aerial view of the Pentagon building in Washington, June 15, 2005. (Reuters/Jason Reed JIR/CN)

WASHINGTON — More than $35 million of the roughly $400 million in aid to Ukraine that President Donald Trump delayed, sparking the impeachment inquiry, has not been released to the country, according to a Pentagon spending document obtained by the Los Angeles Times.

Instead, the defense funding for Ukraine remains in U.S. accounts, according to the document. It's not clear why the money hasn't been released, and members of Congress are demanding answers.

Read More Show Less
Paul Szoldra/Task & Purpose

The admiral in charge of Navy special operators will decide whether to revoke the tridents for Eddie Gallagher and other SEALs involved in the Navy's failed attempt to prosecute Gallagher for murder, a defense official said Tuesday.

The New York Times' David Philipps first reported on Tuesday that the Navy could revoke the SEAL tridents for Gallagher as well as his former platoon commander Lt. Jacob Portier and two other SEALs: Lt. Cmdr. Robert Breisch and Lt. Thomas MacNeil.

The four SEALs will soon receive a letter that they have to appear before a board that will consider whether their tridents should be revoked, a defense official told Task & Purpose on condition of anonymity.

Read More Show Less

Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman made sure to take the time to correct a Congressman on Tuesday while testifying before Congress, requesting that he be addressed by his officer rank and not "Mr."

Read More Show Less