The Army is poised to award a contract this month to produce hundreds of robotic mules to tackle the scourge of hauling tons of gear and other bullshit downrange, the service announced last week.
The service will award a contract to one of four defense contractors — General Dynamics Land Systems, Textron subsidiary Howe & Howe, a team of Applied Research Associates and Polaris Defense, and HDT Expeditionary Systems — to produce its tracked Small Multipurpose Equipment Transport (SMET) planned to be fielded some time in fiscal year 2021.
Each SMET will haul 1,000 pounds, operate over 60 miles in a three-day period, and generate a kilowatt when moving and 3 kilowatts when stationary to recharge both its batteries and assorted equipment, according to the Army.
The four defense contractors originally furnished 20 platforms each to soldiers assigned to the 10th Mountain and 101st Airborne divisions for a months-long operational test demonstration last year.
According to the Army, soldier feedback led to “increasing the S-MET’s carrying capacity and mobility, creating alternative methods for casualty evacuation and robotic obscuration, as well as reducing its noise.”
While the Army initially awarded a $162 million contract to GDLS in November, the service in February opted to allow the four contractors to recompete for the privilege of building the mule, after Textron protested to the Government Accountability Office.
Tetron claimed that GDLS “had been allowed to change its vehicle significantly following a soldier evaluation phase, which made the evaluation invalid even though an award was contingent on such an assessment from users,” Defense News reported.
With fielding scheduled for the second quarter of fiscal year 2021, the Army wants to field a total of 624 vehicles to soldiers by the middle of fiscal year 2024, according to the Army Acquisition Support Center.
In 2015, the Marine Corps decided to shelve plans to field a Legged Squad Support System robot mule after the $42 million, two-and-a-half year development effort between the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Boston Dynamics yielded a prototype that was simply too noisy for operational use.
While it's unclear if noise is a major issue with the existing tracked SMET effort, one other major question remains: With U.S. troops hauling hundreds of pounds of gear downrange, what happens when this robotic bad boy happens to break down during a march?