USCIS officials clarify how military families might be affected by the agency's new citizenship policy

news
A father comforts his child with an American flag before a naturalization ceremony. (U.S. Marine Corps/Pfc. Nicole Rogge)

Since the confusing rollout of a policy affecting the path to citizenship for some children of U.S. service members and government employees, officials have since attempted to clarify that the change will only effect a small number of people a year.

In the text of the policy update released on Wednesday, U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) said that the policy impacted "children residing abroad with their U.S. citizen parents who are U.S. government employees or members of the U.S. armed forces."

But that's not quite the case, as USCIS officials later clarified: it affects only children who were not U.S. citizens at birth, which means children adopted overseas, and children born to non-U.S. citizen parents.

Let's break this down.


  • If you are a U.S. citizen or a naturalized U.S. citizen who has met the residency requirements, your child will receive automatic birthright citizenship and can therefore transmit U.S. citizenship to your child.
  • If you are a U.S. citizen who adopts a child overseas, you must either apply for citizenship on their behalf or obtain an immigration visa for that child and bring them back to the U.S. At that point, upon entering the United States with an immigration visa, they will become a lawful permanent resident (LPR), and after physically and legally living with you — a U.S. citizen — inside the U.S., they too will become a citizen.
  • In the scenario that If you are not a U.S. citizen and are instead a green card holder who is overseas as a U.S. service member or government employee and you have a child with either another lawful permanent resident (LPR) or a foreign national, you must either wait until you naturalize and then apply for citizenship on their behalf or apply for them to have an immigration visa and bring them back to the United States.

"If you're not born on U.S. soil — and military bases aren't considered U.S. soil — if you're not born on U.S. soil, you can get citizenship through your parents," a USCIS official told Task & Purpose. "But the parent has to be a U.S. citizen when you're born. Otherwise they can't transmit anything to you."

"If you are a permanent resident and you have a child, there's no U.S. citizenship transmission that you can do to the child on the day of their birth," they added." You can't transmit what you don't have."

The USCIS official said that they estimate this policy change will affect 20-25 people a year, and it will not have any affect on anyone born in the United States.

U.S. service members who apply for citizenship for their child while abroad can complete the entire process from overseas, the official added, "from application through oath."

It goes into effect on October 29, 2019.

A USCIS official said that the agency has been coordinating with the Department of Defense since May this year on the change. The policy change came about after the State Department "approached" USCIS and asked for them to change the way they were interpreting the law, the official said.

"I think our policy interpretation is sound, but it isn't what the law says," the official said. "If I could change the law to our interpretation, I would happily do so. But the fact of the matter is, it's just not what the statute says."

"The State Department being in variance with us can cause problems down the road if we were to issue a citizenship certificate and the family that that the child was a citizen, and then went to apply for a passport — which is really the most important document for evidence of citizenship — and were to be denied at that point," the official added. "So we and the State Department have to be on exactly the same page."

When reached for comment, Pentagon spokeswoman Lt. Col. Carla Gleason said in a statement that the Defense Department is "committed to ensuring affected families are provided the appropriate information, resources, and support during this transition" before referring people to USCIS' Military Resource Page for further information

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith called the policy change "reprehensible.

"I find this change in policy particularly offensive because it extends the President's hatred for immigrants to members of our military who are faithfully serving our nation," Smith said in a statement. "The current policy has been in effect since 2004 and the underlying law that allows for this recent change in policy has been in effect since 2001, so why now?"

Iraq war veteran and Senator Tammy Duckworth said in a letter to Acting DHS Secretary Kevin McAleenan and Acting USCIS Director Ken Cuccinelli that the policy is "confusing, cynical, unnecessary and unfair. ... The bottom line is that this offensive policy update will harm members of the U.S. Armed Forces, military families and civil servants who serve our Nation abroad."

Cuccinelli doesn't see it that way. The policy "aligns USCIS' process with the Department of State's procedures for these children," he wrote in a Wednesday afternoon tweet. "That's it. Period."

It has been a deadly year for Green Berets, with every active-duty Special Forces Group losing a valued soldier in Afghanistan or Syria.

A total of 12 members of the Army special operations forces community have died in 2019, according to U.S. Army Special Operations Command. All but one of those soldiers were killed in combat.

In Afghanistan, Army special operators account for 10 of the 17 U.S. troops killed so far this year. Eight of the fallen were Green Berets. Of the other two soldiers, one was attached to the 10th Special Forces Group and the other was a Ranger.

Read More Show Less

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Documents from the Pentagon show that "far more taxpayer funds" were spent by the U.S. military on overnight stays at a Trump resort in Scotland than previously known, two Democratic lawmakers said on Wednesday, as they demanded more evidence from the Defense Department as part of their investigation.

In a letter to Defense Secretary Mark Esper, the heads of the House of Representatives Oversight Committee and one of it subcommittees said that while initial reports indicated that only one U.S. military crew had stayed at President Donald Trump's Turnberry resort southeast of Glasgow, the Pentagon had now turned over data indicating "more than three dozen separate stays" since Trump moved into the White House.

Read More Show Less
Sigourney Weaver as Ellen Ripley from 1979's 'Alien' (20th Century Fox)

Editor's Note: This article by Gina Harkins originally appeared on Military.com, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

QUANTICO, Va. -- Marines who spend much of their day lifting hefty ammunition or moving pallets full of gear could soon get a helping hand.

The Marine Corps is close to signing a deal to test an exoskeleton prototype that can help a single person move as much as several leathernecks combined.

Read More Show Less
NEC Corp.'s machine with propellers hovers at the company's facility in Abiko near Tokyo, Monday, Aug. 5, 2019. The Japanese electronics maker showed a "flying car," a large drone-like machine with four propellers that hovered steadily for about a minute. (Associated Press/Koji Sasahara

'Agility Prime' sounds like a revolutionary new video streaming service, or a parkour-themed workout regimen, or Transformers-inspired niche porno venture.

But no, it's the name of the Air Force's nascent effort to replace the V-22 Osprey with a militarized flying car — and it's set to take off sooner than you think.

Read More Show Less
In this March 12, 2016, file photo, Marines of the U.S., left, and South Korea, wearing blue headbands on their helmets, take positions after landing on a beach during the joint military combined amphibious exercise, called Ssangyong, part of the Key Resolve and Foal Eagle military exercises, in Pohang, South Korea. (Associated Press/Yonhap/Kim Jun-bum)

Task & Purpose is looking for a dynamic social media editor to join our team.

Our ideal candidate is an enthusiastic self-starter who can handle a variety of tasks without breaking a sweat. He or she will own our brand's social coverage while working full-time alongside our team of journalists and video producers, posting to Facebook, Twitter, Instagram (feed, stories, and IGTV), YouTube, and elsewhere.

Read More Show Less