USCIS officials clarify how military families might be affected by the agency's new citizenship policy

news
A father comforts his child with an American flag before a naturalization ceremony. (U.S. Marine Corps/Pfc. Nicole Rogge)

Since the confusing rollout of a policy affecting the path to citizenship for some children of U.S. service members and government employees, officials have since attempted to clarify that the change will only effect a small number of people a year.

In the text of the policy update released on Wednesday, U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) said that the policy impacted "children residing abroad with their U.S. citizen parents who are U.S. government employees or members of the U.S. armed forces."

But that's not quite the case, as USCIS officials later clarified: it affects only children who were not U.S. citizens at birth, which means children adopted overseas, and children born to non-U.S. citizen parents.

Let's break this down.


  • If you are a U.S. citizen or a naturalized U.S. citizen who has met the residency requirements, your child will receive automatic birthright citizenship and can therefore transmit U.S. citizenship to your child.
  • If you are a U.S. citizen who adopts a child overseas, you must either apply for citizenship on their behalf or obtain an immigration visa for that child and bring them back to the U.S. At that point, upon entering the United States with an immigration visa, they will become a lawful permanent resident (LPR), and after physically and legally living with you — a U.S. citizen — inside the U.S., they too will become a citizen.
  • In the scenario that If you are not a U.S. citizen and are instead a green card holder who is overseas as a U.S. service member or government employee and you have a child with either another lawful permanent resident (LPR) or a foreign national, you must either wait until you naturalize and then apply for citizenship on their behalf or apply for them to have an immigration visa and bring them back to the United States.

"If you're not born on U.S. soil — and military bases aren't considered U.S. soil — if you're not born on U.S. soil, you can get citizenship through your parents," a USCIS official told Task & Purpose. "But the parent has to be a U.S. citizen when you're born. Otherwise they can't transmit anything to you."

"If you are a permanent resident and you have a child, there's no U.S. citizenship transmission that you can do to the child on the day of their birth," they added." You can't transmit what you don't have."

The USCIS official said that they estimate this policy change will affect 20-25 people a year, and it will not have any affect on anyone born in the United States.

U.S. service members who apply for citizenship for their child while abroad can complete the entire process from overseas, the official added, "from application through oath."

It goes into effect on October 29, 2019.

A USCIS official said that the agency has been coordinating with the Department of Defense since May this year on the change. The policy change came about after the State Department "approached" USCIS and asked for them to change the way they were interpreting the law, the official said.

"I think our policy interpretation is sound, but it isn't what the law says," the official said. "If I could change the law to our interpretation, I would happily do so. But the fact of the matter is, it's just not what the statute says."

"The State Department being in variance with us can cause problems down the road if we were to issue a citizenship certificate and the family that that the child was a citizen, and then went to apply for a passport — which is really the most important document for evidence of citizenship — and were to be denied at that point," the official added. "So we and the State Department have to be on exactly the same page."

When reached for comment, Pentagon spokeswoman Lt. Col. Carla Gleason said in a statement that the Defense Department is "committed to ensuring affected families are provided the appropriate information, resources, and support during this transition" before referring people to USCIS' Military Resource Page for further information

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith called the policy change "reprehensible.

"I find this change in policy particularly offensive because it extends the President's hatred for immigrants to members of our military who are faithfully serving our nation," Smith said in a statement. "The current policy has been in effect since 2004 and the underlying law that allows for this recent change in policy has been in effect since 2001, so why now?"

Iraq war veteran and Senator Tammy Duckworth said in a letter to Acting DHS Secretary Kevin McAleenan and Acting USCIS Director Ken Cuccinelli that the policy is "confusing, cynical, unnecessary and unfair. ... The bottom line is that this offensive policy update will harm members of the U.S. Armed Forces, military families and civil servants who serve our Nation abroad."

Cuccinelli doesn't see it that way. The policy "aligns USCIS' process with the Department of State's procedures for these children," he wrote in a Wednesday afternoon tweet. "That's it. Period."

The number of U.S. troops diagnosed with Traumatic Brain Injury following Iran's missile attack on Al- Asad Air Base in Iraq now stands at 50, the Defense Department announced on Tuesday.

Read More
"You gotta be shitting me." (Antiques Roadshow)

There's nothing quite like finding out that the nifty little trinket you blew a paycheck on when you were a junior enlisted service member is actually worth three-quarters of a million dollars. (Take that every SNCO who ever gave a counseling statement on personal finances.)

Read More

The long-awaited Special Operations Command's ethics review has finally been released, which argues that there is no "systemic ethics problem" in the special operations community while acknowledging a range of underlying problems stemming from a high operations tempo and insufficient leadership.

Read More

John Kelly, the retired Marine general who worked as President Trump's chief of staff for more than 16 months, told a crowd in Sarasota, Florida on Monday that he trusted John Bolton and thinks he should testify in the Senate impeachment trial.

"If John Bolton says that in the book I believe John Bolton," Kelly said during a town hall lecture series, according to the Sarasota Herald-Tribune, mentioning claims in a forthcoming memoir by Trump's former national security advisor that the president told him a freeze on military aid to Ukraine was conditioned on the country opening an investigation into the Bidens.

Read More
U.S. Army/Sgt. Daphney Black

While the Army is making strides at Fort Wainwright with hopes of improving the quality of life at the base and stopping suicide, Army leaders are also reminding soldiers of one simple thing that could make a difference: Get to know your teammates, and look out for one another.

Read More